Paper · 2021 · Journal of Insect Science

Fractionated Extracts From Gnidia kraussiana (Malvales: Thymeleaceae) as Bioactive Phytochemicals for Effective Management of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Stored Vigna unguiculata (Fabales: Fabaceae) Seeds

D Kosini; E N Nukenine; G A Agbor; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

One of the most important global problems is protecting food from insect pests. The negative effects of synthetic insecticides on human health led to a resurgence of interest in botanical insecticides due to their minimal ecological side effects. Therefore, the insecticidal potential of hexane, acetone, and methanol extracts of Gnidia kraussiana Meisn roots at 1 and 5g/kg, and neem seed oil (NSO), used as standard insecticide, were evaluated. Ovicidal and larvicidal toxicity was tested by treating freshly laid eggs and larvae at different immature stages of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (L.) Walp seed damage and weight loss were assessed after a storage period of 4 mo. Repellency effects were detected in choice test using a linear olfactometer. All the fractions were toxic to C. maculatus; however, their bioactivities were inversely correlated with products polarity. Extracts proved to be more toxic than the commercial NSO. The acetone extract was more effective against immature stages of C. maculatus than the methanol extract; eggs, first-, and second-instar larvae being the more susceptible. No cowpea seed damage and weight loss were recorded from the seeds treated with hexane and acetone extracts at the dosage of 5 g/kg, after 4 mo of storage. Extracts evoked stronger repellency effects compared with the tested standard insecticide. According to the above, hexane and acetone extracts are good candidates for incorporation in integrated pest management programs for the control of C. maculatus in stored cowpea seeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All Gnidia extract fractions were toxic to Callosobruchus maculatus.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
fractionse0
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
toxic to C. maculatuse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the fractions were toxic to C. maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna unguiculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–206 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract bioactivity was inversely correlated with product polarity.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Compound
products polaritye0
Outcome
bioactivitiese0
Direction
inversely correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their bioactivities were inversely correlated with products polarity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna unguiculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts were more toxic than commercial neem seed oil.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Extractse0
Outcome
toxice0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
commercial NSOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts proved to be more toxic than the commercial NSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna unguiculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extract was more effective than methanol extract against immature pest stages.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
acetone extracte0
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
effective against immature stages of C. maculatuse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
methanol extracte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The acetone extract was more effective against immature stages of C. maculatus than the methanol extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna unguiculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–206 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eggs and first- and second-instar larvae were more susceptible.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Outcome
eggs, first-, and second-instar larvaee0
Direction
more susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eggs, first-, and second-instar larvae being the more susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna unguiculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexane extract at 5 g/kg prevented cowpea seed damage after four months.

Treatment
hexanee0
Outcome
seed damagee0
Direction
Noe0
Value
5 g/kge0
Qualifier
after 4 mo of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No cowpea seed damage and weight loss were recorded from the seeds treated with hexane and acetone extracts at the dosage of 5 g/kg, after 4 mo of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extract at 5 g/kg prevented cowpea seed damage after four months.

Treatment
acetonee0
Outcome
seed damagee0
Direction
Noe0
Value
5 g/kge0
Qualifier
after 4 mo of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No cowpea seed damage and weight loss were recorded from the seeds treated with hexane and acetone extracts at the dosage of 5 g/kg, after 4 mo of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexane extract prevented cowpea seed weight loss after four months.

Treatment
hexanee0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
Noe0
Qualifier
after 4 mo of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No cowpea seed damage and weight loss were recorded from the seeds treated with hexane and acetone extracts at the dosage of 5 g/kg, after 4 mo of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extract prevented cowpea seed weight loss after four months.

Treatment
acetonee0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
Noe0
Qualifier
after 4 mo of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No cowpea seed damage and weight loss were recorded from the seeds treated with hexane and acetone extracts at the dosage of 5 g/kg, after 4 mo of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts repelled pests more strongly than standard insecticide.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Extractse0
Outcome
repellency effectse0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
tested standard insecticidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts evoked stronger repellency effects compared with the tested standard insecticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna unguiculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–206 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hexane and acetone extracts were recommended for integrated pest management.

Treatment
hexane and acetone extractse0
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
incorporation in integrated pest management programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hexane and acetone extracts are good candidates for incorporation in integrated pest management programs for the control of C. maculatus in stored cowpea seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1569 · show in text ↑

acetone · quality: postharvest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

hexane · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

acetone · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 123 positive, 3 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

botanical · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

163 papers: 158 positive, 5 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

159 papers more in this group

See all 163 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.