Paper · 2020 · European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety

Impact of Environment on Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Response to Acetone Extract of Gnidia kaussiana Meisn (Thymeleaceae) and Ocimum canum Sims (Lamiaceae) Botanical Insecticides

D. Kosini; E. N. Nukenine; K. H. Tofel; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The response of pests to the effects of a botanical insecticide can vary spatially and temporally. To test whether efficacy of botanicals differed spatially, the insecticidal efficacy of Gnidia kaussiana and Ocimum canum against Callosobruchus maculatus was investigated in two different agro-ecological zones of Cameroon, i.e. Maroua and Ngaoundéré (sudano-sahelian and sudano-guinean zones, respectively). Experiments were, therefore, conducted to determine the insect mortality, progeny production, grain damage and weight loss in cowpea. G. kaussiana was more effective against C. maculatus in Maroua (LD50 = 0.12 g/kg at 6th day of exposure) than in Ngaoundéré (LD50 = 4.35 g/kg at 6th day of exposure). Moreover, it was more toxic than O. canum extract and neem seed oil (reference), irrespective to the agro-ecological zones. Overall, the performance of O. canum did not vary significantly between the two zones, and was slightly more active (LD50 = 4.66 g/kg) than the reference insecticide neem seed oil (LD50 = 4.89 g/kg) in Ngaoundéré in contrast to the results recoded in Maroua (LD50 = 1.44 g/kg and 2.60 g/kg, respectively for neem seed oil and O. canum at 6 days post exposure). In view of the above, there were some discrepancies in extract performance between Maroua and Ngaoundéré. Thus, the establishment of dose rates of insecticidal products formulated from G. kaussiana must be specific to an environment in contrast to those from O. canum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gnidia kaussiana was more effective against Callosobruchus maculatus in Maroua than Ngaoundéré.

Treatment
G. kaussianae0
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
C. maculatuse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
LD50 = 0.12 g/kge0
Qualifier
LD50 = 4.35 g/kge0
Comparator
Ngaoundérée0
Setting
Marouae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. kaussiana was more effective against C. maculatus in Maroua (LD50 = 0.12 g/kg at 6th day of exposure) than in Ngaoundéré (LD50 = 4.35 g/kg at 6th day of exposure)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gnidia kaussiana Meisn (Thymeleaceae) and Ocimum canum Sims (Lamiaceae) Botanical Insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–203 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain damage and weight loss in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gnidia kaussiana was more toxic than Ocimum canum extract and neem seed oil across zones.

Treatment
Gnidia kaussianat0
Outcome
toxice0
Direction
more toxice0
Comparator
O. canum extract and neem seed oile0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was more toxic than O. canum extract and neem seed oil (reference), irrespective to the agro-ecological zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain damage and weight loss in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gnidia kaussiana Meisn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimum canum performance did not vary significantly between the two zones.

Outcome
performance of O. canume0
Direction
did not varye0
Setting
the two zonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the performance of O. canum did not vary significantly between the two zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain damage and weight loss in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimum canum was slightly more active than neem seed oil in Ngaoundéré, with respective LD50 values of 4.66 and 4.89 g/kg.

Treatment
Ocimum canumt0
Outcome
activee0
Direction
more activee0
Value
LD50 = 4.66 g/kge0
Qualifier
LD50 = 4.89 g/kge0
Comparator
neem seed oile0
Setting
Ngaoundérée0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slightly more active (LD50 = 4.66 g/kg) than the reference insecticide neem seed oil (LD50 = 4.89 g/kg) in Ngaoundéré”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1045 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain damage and weight loss in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ocimum canum Sims”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Maroua neem seed oil had a lower LD50 than Ocimum canum at six days.

Treatment
neem seed oile0
Outcome
LD50e0
Value
LD50 = 1.44 g/kge0
Qualifier
2.60 g/kge0
Comparator
O. canume0
Setting
Marouae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Maroua (LD50 = 1.44 g/kg and 2.60 g/kg, respectively for neem seed oil and O. canum at 6 days post exposure)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1192 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain damage and weight loss in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–540 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend environment-specific dose rates for products made from Gnidia kaussiana.

Outcome
dose rates of insecticidal products formulated from G. kaussianae0
Qualifier
specific to an environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“establishment of dose rates of insecticidal products formulated from G. kaussiana must be specific to an environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1426 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain damage and weight loss in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–540 · show in text ↑

botanical · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 123 positive, 3 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.