Paper · 2014 · Annals of biological research

Bioefficacy of leaf and peel extracts of Euphorbia balsamifera L. and Citrus sinensis L. against Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. [Coleoptera: Bruchidae].

M. Suleiman; B. Y. Shinkafi; Sulaeman Yusuf

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of selected plants extracts of Euphorbia balsamifera L. and Citrus sinensis L. against Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. in the laboratory under the conditions of 28 ± 2°C and 70 ± 5% R.H. The test insects were reared in rearing bottles and tested on whole cowpea seeds for comparison. Different concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g of the plant extracts were dissolved in 10 ml acetone and applied for mortality, seed damage and germination tests. Total (100%) mortality of adults of C. maculatus was observed after 3.67 to 6.67 days of treatment with the plant extracts. The findings of this study revealed that the plant extracts significantly (P<0.05) reduced cowpea seed weight loss. There was no (0.00%) weight loss of cowpea seeds recorded when higher (2.0 g/10.0 ml acetone) concentration of both extracts was applied. These plant extracts showed significant (P<0.05) effect on the germination capacity of cowpea seeds. The results obtained in this study indicated that extracts from C. sinensis and E. balsamifera had potentially reduced C. maculatus infestation on cowpea seeds. Hence, recommended for the control of C. maculatus attacking cowpea seeds during storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant extracts of E. balsamifera and C. sinensis caused total (100%) mortality of Callosobruchus maculatus adults after 3.67 to 6.67 days.

Treatment
plant extractse1
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse1pest
Outcome
mortality of adults of C. maculatuse1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
100%e1
Qualifier
after 3.67 to 6.67 dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Total (100%) mortality of adults of C. maculatus was observed after 3.67 to 6.67 days of treatment with the plant extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–620 · show in text ↑
e2

“tested on whole cowpea seeds for comparison”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant extracts significantly reduced cowpea seed weight loss.

Treatment
plant extractse1
Outcome
cowpea seed weight losse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the plant extracts significantly (P<0.05) reduced cowpea seed weight loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No weight loss (0.00%) of cowpea seeds was recorded at the higher concentration (2.0 g/10.0 ml acetone) of both extracts.

Treatment
higher (2.0 g/10.0 ml acetone) concentration of both extractse1
Outcome
weight loss of cowpea seedse1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
0.00%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was no (0.00%) weight loss of cowpea seeds recorded when higher (2.0 g/10.0 ml acetone) concentration of both extracts was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant extracts had a significant effect on the germination capacity of cowpea seeds.

Treatment
plant extractse1
Outcome
germination capacity of cowpea seedse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These plant extracts showed significant (P<0.05) effect on the germination capacity of cowpea seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts from C. sinensis and E. balsamifera potentially reduced C. maculatus infestation on cowpea seeds.

Treatment
extracts from C. sinensis and E. balsamiferae1
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse1pest
Outcome
C. maculatus infestatione1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“extracts from C. sinensis and E. balsamifera had potentially reduced C. maculatus infestation on cowpea seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1136 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The extracts are recommended for controlling C. maculatus on stored cowpea seeds.

Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse1pest
Outcome
control of C. maculatuse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“recommended for the control of C. maculatus attacking cowpea seeds during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1226 · show in text ↑

acetone · quality: postharvest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Citrus sinensis · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

botanical · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

163 papers: 158 positive, 5 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

159 papers more in this group

See all 163 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.