Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Optimal Agronomics Increase Grain Yield and Grain Yield Stability of Ultra-Early Wheat Seeding Systems

Graham R. S. Collier; Dean M. Spaner; Robert J. Graf; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ultra-early seeding of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on the northern Great Plains can increase grain yield and grain yield stability compared to current spring wheat planting systems. Field trials were conducted in western Canada from 2015 to 2018 to evaluate the impact of optimal agronomic management on grain yield, quality, and stability in ultra-early wheat seeding systems. Four planting times initiated by soil temperature triggers were evaluated. The earliest planting was triggered when soils reached 0–2.5 °C at a 5 cm depth, with the subsequent three plantings completed at 2.5 °C intervals up to soil temperatures of 10 °C. Two spring wheat lines were seeded at each planting date at two seeding depths (2.5 and 5 cm), and two seeding rates (200 and 400 seeds m−2). The greatest grain yield and stability occurred from combinations of the earliest seeding dates, high seeding rate, and shallow seeding depth; wheat line did not influence grain yield. Grain protein content was greater at later seeding dates; however, the greater grain yield at earlier seeding dates resulted in more protein production per unit area. Despite extreme ambient air temperatures below 0 °C after planting, plant survival was not reduced at the earliest seeding dates. Planting wheat as soon as feasible after soil temperatures reach 0 °C, and prior to soils reaching 7.5–10 °C, at an optimal seeding rate and shallow seeding depth increased grain yield and stability compared to current seeding practices. Adopting ultra-early wheat seeding systems on the northern Great Plains will lead to additional grain yield benefits as climate change continues to increase annual average growing season temperatures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earliest seeding dates, high seeding rate, and shallow seeding depth gave greatest grain yield.

Treatment
combinations of the earliest seeding dates, high seeding rate, and shallow seeding depthe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest grain yield and stability occurred from combinations of the earliest seeding dates, high seeding rate, and shallow seeding depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same management combinations gave greatest yield stability.

Treatment
combinations of the earliest seeding dates, high seeding rate, and shallow seeding depthe0
Outcome
stabilitye0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest grain yield and stability occurred from combinations of the earliest seeding dates, high seeding rate, and shallow seeding depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–925 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat line did not influence grain yield.

Material
wheat linee0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“wheat line did not influence grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later seeding dates increased grain protein content.

Treatment
later seeding datese0
Outcome
Grain protein contente0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein content was greater at later seeding dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier seeding increased protein production per area through higher yield.

Treatment
earlier seeding datese0
Outcome
protein production per unit areae0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the greater grain yield at earlier seeding dates resulted in more protein production per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant survival was not reduced at earliest seeding dates despite subzero air temperatures.

Treatment
earliest seeding datese0
Outcome
plant survivale0
Direction
not reducede0
Qualifier
extreme ambient air temperatures below 0 °Ce0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Despite extreme ambient air temperatures below 0 °C after planting, plant survival was not reduced at the earliest seeding dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting at 0 °C and before 7.5–10 °C with optimal rate and shallow depth increased grain yield over current practice.

Treatment
Planting wheat as soon as feasible after soil temperatures reach 0 °C, and prior to soils reaching 7.5–10 °C, at an optimal seeding rate and shallow seeding depthe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
current seeding practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting wheat as soon as feasible after soil temperatures reach 0 °C, and prior to soils reaching 7.5–10 °C, at an optimal seeding rate and shallow seeding depth increased grain yield and stability compared to current seeding practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same planting approach increased yield stability over current practice.

Treatment
Planting wheat as soon as feasible after soil temperatures reach 0 °C, and prior to soils reaching 7.5–10 °C, at an optimal seeding rate and shallow seeding depthe0
Outcome
stabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
current seeding practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting wheat as soon as feasible after soil temperatures reach 0 °C, and prior to soils reaching 7.5–10 °C, at an optimal seeding rate and shallow seeding depth increased grain yield and stability compared to current seeding practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1503 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors project further grain-yield benefit from ultra-early seeding as growing seasons warm.

Outcome
Adopting ultra-early wheat seeding systemse0
Setting
northern Great Plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adopting ultra-early wheat seeding systems on the northern Great Plains will lead to additional grain yield benefits as climate change continues to increase annual average growing season temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1704 · show in text ↑

sowing time · survival · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.