Paper · 2020 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Evaluation of G × E × M Interactions to Increase Harvest Index and Yield of Early Sown Wheat

Kenton Porker; Michael Straight; James Robert Hunt

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
80
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Harvest index (HI) is the ratio of grain to total shoot dry matter and is as a measure of reproductive efficiency. HI is determined by interactions between genotypes (G), environment (E), and crop management (M). Historic genetic yield gains due to breeding in wheat have largely been achieved by increasing HI. Environmental factors are important for HI and include seasonal pattern of water supply and extreme temperatures during crop reproductive development. Wheat production in Australia has been dominated by fast-developing spring cultivars that when sown in late-autumn will flower at an optimal time in early spring. Water limited potential yield can be increased by sowing slower developing wheats with a vernalization requirement (winter wheat) earlier than currently practiced such that their development is matched to environment and they flower at the optimal time. This means a longer vegetative phase which increases rooting depth, proportion of water-use transpired, and transpiration efficiency by allowing more growth during winter when vapour pressure deficit is low. All these factors can increase biomass accumulation, grain number and thus grain yield potential. However higher yields are not always realized due to a lower HI of early sown slow developing wheats compared to fast developing wheats sown later. Here, we evaluate genotype × management practices to improve HI and yield in early sown slow developing wheat crops using 6 field experiments conducted across south eastern Australia from 2014 to 2018 in yield environments ranging from ~1 to ~4.7 t/ha. Practices included low plant densities (30-50 plants/m²), mechanical defoliation, and deferred application of nitrogen fertilizer. Lower plant densities had similar yield and HI to higher plant densities. Defoliation tended to increase HI but reduce yield except when there was severe stem frost damage. Deferring nitrogen had a variable effect depending on starting soil N and in crop rainfall. All management strategies evaluated gave variable HI and yield responses with small effect sizes, and we conclude that none of them can reliably increase HI in early sown wheat. We propose that genetic improvement is the most promising avenue for increasing HI and yield in early sown wheat, and postulate that this could be achieved more rapidly through early generation screening for HI in slow developing genotypes than by crop management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower plant densities gave similar yield and harvest index to higher plant densities in early sown wheat.

Treatment
Lower plant densitiese1
Outcome
yield and HIe1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
higher plant densitiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here, we evaluate genotype × management practices to improve HI and yield in early sown slow developing wheat crops using 6 field experiments conducted across south eastern Australia from 2014 to 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1534 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lower plant densities had similar yield and HI to higher plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation tended to increase harvest index in early sown wheat.

Treatment
Defoliatione2
Outcome
HIe2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
tended toe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here, we evaluate genotype × management practices to improve HI and yield in early sown slow developing wheat crops using 6 field experiments conducted across south eastern Australia from 2014 to 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1534 · show in text ↑
e2

“Defoliation tended to increase HI but reduce yield except when there was severe stem frost damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation tended to reduce yield in early sown wheat, except when severe stem frost damage occurred.

Treatment
Defoliatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
reducee2
Qualifier
except when there was severe stem frost damagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here, we evaluate genotype × management practices to improve HI and yield in early sown slow developing wheat crops using 6 field experiments conducted across south eastern Australia from 2014 to 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1534 · show in text ↑
e2

“Defoliation tended to increase HI but reduce yield except when there was severe stem frost damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deferring nitrogen had a variable effect on wheat depending on starting soil N and in-crop rainfall.

Treatment
Deferring nitrogene3
Outcome
effecte3
Direction
variablee3
Qualifier
depending on starting soil N and in crop rainfalle3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here, we evaluate genotype × management practices to improve HI and yield in early sown slow developing wheat crops using 6 field experiments conducted across south eastern Australia from 2014 to 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1534 · show in text ↑
e3

“Deferring nitrogen had a variable effect depending on starting soil N and in crop rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1891–1981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All evaluated management strategies gave variable harvest index and yield responses with small effect sizes in early sown wheat.

Treatment
management strategiese4
Outcome
HI and yield responsese4
Direction
variablee4
Qualifier
with small effect sizese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here, we evaluate genotype × management practices to improve HI and yield in early sown slow developing wheat crops using 6 field experiments conducted across south eastern Australia from 2014 to 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1534 · show in text ↑
e4

“All management strategies evaluated gave variable HI and yield responses with small effect sizes, and we conclude that none of them can reliably increase HI in early sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

None of the management practices can reliably increase harvest index in early sown wheat.

Outcome
increase HI in early sown wheate4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here, we evaluate genotype × management practices to improve HI and yield in early sown slow developing wheat crops using 6 field experiments conducted across south eastern Australia from 2014 to 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1534 · show in text ↑
e4

“All management strategies evaluated gave variable HI and yield responses with small effect sizes, and we conclude that none of them can reliably increase HI in early sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic improvement is proposed as the most promising avenue for increasing harvest index and yield in early sown wheat.

Outcome
increasing HI and yield in early sown wheate5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here, we evaluate genotype × management practices to improve HI and yield in early sown slow developing wheat crops using 6 field experiments conducted across south eastern Australia from 2014 to 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1534 · show in text ↑
e5

“We propose that genetic improvement is the most promising avenue for increasing HI and yield in early sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2161–2273 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early generation screening for HI in slow developing genotypes may achieve faster HI gains than crop management.

Outcome
early generation screening for HI in slow developing genotypese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here, we evaluate genotype × management practices to improve HI and yield in early sown slow developing wheat crops using 6 field experiments conducted across south eastern Australia from 2014 to 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1534 · show in text ↑
e6

“postulate that this could be achieved more rapidly through early generation screening for HI in slow developing genotypes than by crop management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2279–2424 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 33 positive, 60 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 376 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.