Paper · 1982 · Agronomy Journal

Date of Seeding, Fall Growth, and Winter Survival of Winter Wheat and Rye

D. B. Fowler

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
57
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In the northern part of the North American Great Plains the level of cultivar winterhardiness required for winter cereal production is extremely high. Therefore, for successful production in this area close attention must be paid to all factors that influence a plant's ability to attain maximum winterhardiness. In this study, the influence of date of seeding on fall growth and winter survival of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and rye ( Secale cereale L.) was assessed in seven trials grown on udic and typic boroll soils in the northcentral part of the agricultural area of Saskatchewan. In these trials, four wheat and two rye cultivars were seeded at 2 week intervals between 1 August and 15 October in each of 3 years. During this period, rye accumulated shoot dry matter at twice the rate of wheat. However, as expected, a decrease in shoot dry weight of both wheat and rye occurred with each succeeding delay in seeding date. The only meaningful winter damage that was observed in the rye was for the last two seeding dates with ‘Cougar’. The effect of date of seeding on survival of wheat was not consistent among trials. However, average survival was highest for the 15 August and 1 September seeding dates. This was 4 to 6 weeks prior to the onset of fall conditions favorable for cold acclimation. Differences in survival among wheat cultivars were not influenced by seeding date. This allowed for utilization of the Field Survival Index to evaluate the relative effects of suboptimal seeding dates on winter survival potential of cultivars. These results demonstrate that the Field Survival Index can be used to evaluate the effects of certain management practices in addition to inherent cultivar potential on winter survival.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye accumulated shoot dry matter at twice the rate of wheat in fall.

Outcome
shoot dry mattere1
Direction
twicee1
Comparator
wheate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rye accumulated shoot dry matter at twice the rate of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight of wheat decreased with each succeeding delay in seeding date.

Treatment
delay in seeding datee1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a decrease in shoot dry weight of both wheat and rye occurred with each succeeding delay in seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight of rye decreased with each succeeding delay in seeding date.

Treatment
delay in seeding datee1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a decrease in shoot dry weight of both wheat and rye occurred with each succeeding delay in seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–948 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The only meaningful winter damage in rye occurred for the last two seeding dates with the cultivar Cougar.

Material
Cougare1
Treatment
last two seeding datese1
Outcome
winter damagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The only meaningful winter damage that was observed in the rye was for the last two seeding dates with ‘Cougar’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of seeding date on survival of wheat was not consistent among trials.

Treatment
date of seedinge1
Outcome
survivale1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of date of seeding on survival of wheat was not consistent among trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average wheat survival was highest for the 15 August and 1 September seeding dates.

Treatment
15 August and 1 September seeding datese1
Outcome
average survivale1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of date of seeding on survival of wheat was not consistent among trials. However, average survival was highest for the 15 August and 1 September seeding dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in survival among wheat cultivars were not influenced by seeding date.

Treatment
seeding datee1
Outcome
Differences in survival among wheat cultivarse1
Direction
not influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Differences in survival among wheat cultivars were not influenced by seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1407 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Field Survival Index can be used to evaluate effects of management practices, in addition to inherent cultivar potential, on winter survival.

Outcome
Field Survival Index can be used to evaluate the effects of certain management practicese1
Comparator
inherent cultivar potentiale1

Verbatim

e1

“the Field Survival Index can be used to evaluate the effects of certain management practices in addition to inherent cultivar potential on winter survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1755 · show in text ↑

sowing time · survival · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sowing time · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 65 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.