Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Growth, Yield and Quality Parameters of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as Influenced by Integrated Nutrient Management Application

Jagraj Singh; Manoj Kumar Singh; Mukesh Kumar; et al.

6
claims
21
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was carried out at Horticulture Research Centre of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut during 2018. Total ten treatments were tried in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications to study the effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of Cucumber. Out of these, an application of 75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1 was found significantly superior in terms of growth, yield and quality parameters i.e. vine length (cm), number of leaves plant-1, number of primary branches plant-1, length and width of leaf (cm), days taken to first fruit formation (days), number of fruits plant-1, length and width of fruit at edible maturity (cm), weight of fruit at edible maturity (g), fruit yield plant-1 (kg), fruit yield plot-1(kg), total fruit yield (qha-1), TSS (0Brix)and peel thickness (cm) as compared to control and other applied treatment. Overall the impact of above observation, the highest yield (148.88 qha-1) of green tender fruits was recorded with a combined dose of different organic and inorganic sources of nutrients like 75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1 and minimum yield (93.33 qha-1) of green tender fruits was observed under control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment significantly improved cucumber vine and leaf growth traits relative to control and other treatments.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1e0
Outcome
vine length (cm), number of leaves plant-1, number of primary branches plant-1, length and width of leaf (cm)e0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and other applied treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1 was found significantly superior in terms of growth, yield and quality parameters i.e. vine length (cm), number of leaves plant-1, number of primary branches plant-1, length and width of leaf (cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–606 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control and other applied treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment significantly improved cucumber fruit formation and fruit number relative to control and other treatments.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1e0
Outcome
days taken to first fruit formation (days), number of fruits plant-1e1
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and other applied treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1 was found significantly superior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“days taken to first fruit formation (days), number of fruits plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–676 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to control and other applied treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment significantly improved cucumber fruit dimensions and weight relative to control and other treatments.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1e0
Outcome
length and width of fruit at edible maturity (cm), weight of fruit at edible maturity (g)e1
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and other applied treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1 was found significantly superior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“length and width of fruit at edible maturity (cm), weight of fruit at edible maturity (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–767 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to control and other applied treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment significantly improved cucumber yield measures relative to control and other treatments.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1e0
Outcome
fruit yield plant-1 (kg), fruit yield plot-1(kg), total fruit yield (qha-1)e1
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and other applied treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1 was found significantly superior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit yield plant-1 (kg), fruit yield plot-1(kg), total fruit yield (qha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–844 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to control and other applied treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment significantly improved cucumber TSS and peel thickness relative to control and other treatments.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1e0
Outcome
TSS (0Brix)and peel thickness (cm)e1
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and other applied treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1 was found significantly superior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“TSS (0Brix)and peel thickness (cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–880 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to control and other applied treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment produced the highest green tender fruit yield of 148.88 qha-1 versus 93.33 qha-1 under control.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
148.88 qha-1e0
Qualifier
93.33 qha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest yield (148.88 qha-1) of green tender fruits was recorded with a combined dose of different organic and inorganic sources of nutrients like 75% RDF + 12.5 % FYM + 12.5 % VCha-1 and minimum yield (93.33 qha-1) of green tender fruits was observed under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1243 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 179 positive, 23 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.