Paper · 2024 · Ministry of Science and Technology Vietnam

Effects of some types of organic fertilisers on growth, yield and quality of Cucumis sativus L. grown in Vinh Phuc province under greenhouse conditions

Thi Thu Hien Phan; Thi Ngoc Dinh Nguyen; Thi Tuyet Cham Le

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of organic fertilisers on the growth, yield, and quality of the Khassib RZ F1 cucumber variety in Vinh Phuc. The one-factor experiment was arranged in a completely randomised block design with 3 replications, including 4 treatments (fertilise for 1 hectare) including: (1) Control: Use 100% inorganic fertiliser (150 kg N + 90 kg P2O5 + 150 kg K2O); (2) CT1: 25% inorganic fertiliser + 22.5 tons of composted chicken manure; (3) CT2: 25% inorganic fertiliser + 18 tons of vermicompost; (4) CT3: 25% inorganic fertiliser + 3750 kg of Que Lam 01 microbial organic fertiliser. The results showed that using earthworm organic fertiliser (CT2) had the highest actual yield. The fruiting rate in CT2 reached the highest at 68.55%, CT3 using Que Lam 01 microbial organic fertiliser had the lowest fruiting rate of 59.71%. CT2 achieved the highest number of fruits plant-1, 4.82 fruits plant-1. The actual yield was highest in CT2 (15.96 kg plot-1), and lowest in the control treatment (11.39 kg plot-1). The nitrate accumulated in cucumbers in all treatments was below the threshold. The vermicompost fertiliser treatment (CT2) also gave good quality indicators of cucumbers such as thick intestine and very crispy taste. From these results, CT2 treatment with 25% inorganic fertiliser and 18 tons of vermicompost is suitable for the growth, development, yield, and quality of the Khassib RZ F1 cucumber variety in Vinh Phuc province.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost treatment CT2 gave the highest cucumber fruiting rate, 68.55%.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativust0
Treatment
CT2e0
Outcome
fruiting ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
68.55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruiting rate in CT2 reached the highest at 68.55%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumis sativus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial organic fertiliser CT3 gave the lowest cucumber fruiting rate, 59.71%.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativust0
Treatment
Que Lam 01 microbial organic fertilisere0
Outcome
fruiting ratee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
59.71%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT3 using Que Lam 01 microbial organic fertiliser had the lowest fruiting rate of 59.71%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumis sativus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT2 had the highest fruit number per cucumber plant, 4.82.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativust0
Treatment
CT2e0
Outcome
number of fruits plant-1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.82 fruits plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT2 achieved the highest number of fruits plant-1, 4.82 fruits plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumis sativus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT2 produced the highest actual cucumber yield, 15.96 kg per plot.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativust0
Treatment
CT2e0
Outcome
actual yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.96 kg plot-1e0
Qualifier
11.39 kg plot-1e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The actual yield was highest in CT2 (15.96 kg plot-1), and lowest in the control treatment (11.39 kg plot-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumis sativus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber nitrate accumulation was below the threshold in every treatment.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
nitrate accumulatede0
Direction
below the thresholde0
Qualifier
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrate accumulated in cucumbers in all treatments was below the threshold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT2 gave cucumbers a thick intestine and very crispy taste.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
vermicompost fertiliser treatment (CT2)e0
Outcome
thick intestine and very crispy tastee0
Direction
goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vermicompost fertiliser treatment (CT2) also gave good quality indicators of cucumbers such as thick intestine and very crispy taste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1261 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged CT2 with 25% inorganic fertiliser and 18 tons of vermicompost suitable for Khassib RZ F1 cucumber growth, yield and quality in Vinh Phuc.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
Khassib RZ F1e0
Treatment
25% inorganic fertiliser and 18 tons of vermicomposte0
Outcome
growth, development, yield, and qualitye0
Setting
Vinh Phuc provincee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT2 treatment with 25% inorganic fertiliser and 18 tons of vermicompost is suitable for the growth, development, yield, and quality of the Khassib RZ F1 cucumber variety in Vinh Phuc province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1474 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.