Paper · 2020 · The Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati Fascicle VI – Food Technology

Effect of heat processing on the nutritional and anti-nutritional factors of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)

Viruska Jaichand; Depika Dwarka; Abe Shegro Gerrano; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nutritionally enhanced cowpea genotypes provide considerable amounts of nutritional composition, which are useful to tackle nutritional deficiency status among rural and urban populations. However, the presence of anti-nutritional factors reduces the availability and absorption of nutrients, particularly of important micronutrients for growth and development. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the response of different processing method that allows availability of maximum nutrients in the seeds of test cowpea cultivars. Results showed that soaked cowpea samples had the lowest nutritional content and greatest anti-nutritional content. Boiling allowed for an improved protein content (19-21%) and was the most effective in reducing cyanogenic glycosides (0.18-0.38 mg/100 g), phytic acid (±1.21 mg/100 g), tannins (0 mg/100 g) and trypsin inhibitors (55-155 TIU/g). While, autoclaving was the most effective in reducing the oxalic acid (±2 mg/100 g) content based on the presence of water-insoluble oxalic acid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaked cowpea samples had the lowest nutritional content.

Treatment
soaked cowpea samplese1
Outcome
nutritional contente1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that soaked cowpea samples had the lowest nutritional content and greatest anti-nutritional content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaked cowpea samples had the greatest anti-nutritional content.

Treatment
soaked cowpea samplese1
Outcome
anti-nutritional contente1
Direction
greateste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that soaked cowpea samples had the lowest nutritional content and greatest anti-nutritional content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiling improved the protein content of cowpea to 19-21 %.

Treatment
Boilinge2
Outcome
protein contente2
Direction
improvede2
Value
19-21%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“Boiling allowed for an improved protein content (19-21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiling was the most effective method in reducing cyanogenic glycosides in cowpea, to 0.18-0.38 mg/100 g.

Treatment
Boilinge2
Outcome
cyanogenic glycosidese3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
0.18-0.38 mg/100 ge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“Boiling allowed for an improved protein content (19-21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–710 · show in text ↑
e3

“was the most effective in reducing cyanogenic glycosides (0.18-0.38 mg/100 g), phytic acid (±1.21 mg/100 g), tannins (0 mg/100 g) and trypsin inhibitors (55-155 TIU/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiling was the most effective method in reducing phytic acid in cowpea, to ±1.21 mg/100 g.

Treatment
Boilinge2
Outcome
phytic acide3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
±1.21 mg/100 ge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“Boiling allowed for an improved protein content (19-21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–710 · show in text ↑
e3

“was the most effective in reducing cyanogenic glycosides (0.18-0.38 mg/100 g), phytic acid (±1.21 mg/100 g), tannins (0 mg/100 g) and trypsin inhibitors (55-155 TIU/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiling was the most effective method in reducing tannins in cowpea, to 0 mg/100 g.

Treatment
Boilinge2
Outcome
tanninse3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
0 mg/100 ge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“Boiling allowed for an improved protein content (19-21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–710 · show in text ↑
e3

“was the most effective in reducing cyanogenic glycosides (0.18-0.38 mg/100 g), phytic acid (±1.21 mg/100 g), tannins (0 mg/100 g) and trypsin inhibitors (55-155 TIU/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiling was the most effective method in reducing trypsin inhibitors in cowpea, to 55-155 TIU/g.

Treatment
Boilinge2
Outcome
trypsin inhibitorse3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
55-155 TIU/ge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“Boiling allowed for an improved protein content (19-21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–710 · show in text ↑
e3

“was the most effective in reducing cyanogenic glycosides (0.18-0.38 mg/100 g), phytic acid (±1.21 mg/100 g), tannins (0 mg/100 g) and trypsin inhibitors (55-155 TIU/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autoclaving was the most effective method in reducing oxalic acid in cowpea, to ±2 mg/100 g.

Treatment
autoclavinge4
Outcome
oxalic acide4
Direction
reducinge4
Value
±2 mg/100 ge4
Qualifier
based on the presence of water-insoluble oxalic acide4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“autoclaving was the most effective in reducing the oxalic acid (±2 mg/100 g) content based on the presence of water-insoluble oxalic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1028 · show in text ↑

application · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

processing · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.