Paper · 2015 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Evaluation of Household Cleaning Methods for Reducing Chlorantraniliprole Residues on Cowpea Fruits

Xiao-Jun Chen; Zhi-Yuan Meng; Ping Wang; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

All pesticide residues are toxic by design and pose seriously health dangers to people. We explored an effective cleaning technique of food safety and handling guidelines. Chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea fruits were determined by LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) after different cleaning methods. Both soaking the cowpea fruits in water for 15 min and soaking in 0.1% edible vinegar for 15 min followed by rinsing with running tap water for 2 min could effectively remove the chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea fruits. Cleaning with running tap water for 2 min was the worst cleaning method. Both the treatments of soaking in acidic and neutral pH cleaning solution could generate good removal efficiency of chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea. Different cleaning solution concentration did not give significant difference removal efficiency. Our research provided the inherent relationship between pesticide residues and cleaning approaches, also the important theoretical basis for risk assessments of food.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking cowpea fruits in water for 15 minutes effectively removed chlorantraniliprole residues.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
soaking the cowpea fruits in water for 15 mine0
Outcome
chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea fruitse0
Direction
removee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both soaking the cowpea fruits in water for 15 min and soaking in 0.1% edible vinegar for 15 min followed by rinsing with running tap water for 2 min could effectively remove the chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking cowpea fruits in 0.1% edible vinegar for 15 minutes followed by a two-minute tap-water rinse effectively removed chlorantraniliprole residues.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
soaking in 0.1% edible vinegar for 15 min followed by rinsing with running tap water for 2 mine0
Outcome
chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea fruitse0
Direction
removee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both soaking the cowpea fruits in water for 15 min and soaking in 0.1% edible vinegar for 15 min followed by rinsing with running tap water for 2 min could effectively remove the chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleaning cowpea fruits under running tap water for two minutes was the least effective method.

Treatment
Cleaning with running tap water for 2 mine0
Outcome
worst cleaning methode0
Direction
worste0
Comparator
cleaning methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cleaning with running tap water for 2 min was the worst cleaning method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking cowpea in acidic cleaning solution had good removal efficiency for chlorantraniliprole residues.

Treatment
soaking in acidice0
Outcome
removal efficiency of chlorantraniliprole residuese0
Direction
goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the treatments of soaking in acidic and neutral pH cleaning solution could generate good removal efficiency of chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking cowpea in neutral-pH cleaning solution had good removal efficiency for chlorantraniliprole residues.

Treatment
neutral pH cleaning solutione0
Outcome
removal efficiency of chlorantraniliprole residuese0
Direction
goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the treatments of soaking in acidic and neutral pH cleaning solution could generate good removal efficiency of chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleaning solution concentration did not significantly change residue removal efficiency.

Treatment
Different cleaning solution concentratione0
Outcome
removal efficiencye0
Direction
did not give significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Different cleaning solution concentration did not give significant difference removal efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–880 · show in text ↑

ph · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.