Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Boiling was the most effective method in reducing tannins in cowpea, to 0 mg/100 g.

A claim from Effect of heat processing on the nutritional and anti-nutritional factors of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiling was the most effective method in reducing tannins in cowpea, to 0 mg/100 g.

Treatment
Boilinge2
Outcome
tanninse3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
0 mg/100 ge3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–103
e2

“Boiling allowed for an improved protein content (19-21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–710
e3

“was the most effective in reducing cyanogenic glycosides (0.18-0.38 mg/100 g), phytic acid (±1.21 mg/100 g), tannins (0 mg/100 g) and trypsin inhibitors (55-155 TIU/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–882

Title

Effect of heat processing on the nutritional and anti-nutritional factors of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)

Viruska Jaichand; Depika Dwarka; Abe Shegro Gerrano; et al. The Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati Fascicle VI – Food Technology 2020. doi:10.35219/foodtechnology.2020.1.10

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-38ee252af971dc2c2a1526118d872ccc96da621b41619e48169fa6e90f3bce1c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.