Abstract
The research was conducted in 2018-2019 in the conditions of the Republic of Mari El on sod-podzolic soil. Studied was the response of five varieties of spring triticale to the basal application of mineral fertilizers N 60 P 60 K 60 and nitrogen fertilization N 30 in the tillering phase. In 2018, grain productivity of the Rovnya (standard), Saur and Dobroe varieties (3.80-4.07 t/ha) was significantly lower than that of the Hajkar and Zaozerie varieties (4.31-4.81 t/ha). The application of N 30 in the tillering phase against the background without mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivation provided a significant increase in yield of the varieties Hajkar (0.67 t/ha, or +15%), Dobroe (0.68 t/ha, or +17%) and Saur (0.77 t/ha, or +20%). The payback of mineral fertilizers used for pre-sowing cultivation with the increase in grain yield was not high (3.7-7.7 kg). The application of nitrogen top dressing on the background without the use of mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivation was effective: Hajkar, Saur and Dobroe varieties provided a payback of 22-25 kg of grain per 1 kg of fertilizers. In unfavorable arid agro-climatic conditions of 2019, the yield of the studied varieties decreased to 2.17-3.84 t/ha, but was significantly higher by 0.4-1.0 t/ha of the control variety Rovnya. The yield increase from nitrogen fertilization was less substantial and achieved reliable values (LSD 05 = 0.25 t/ha) in standard Rovnya variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 and N 60 P 60 K 60 backgrounds) − 0.35 and 0.51 t/ha, respectively, Dobroe variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 background) - 0.39 t/ha and Hajkar variety (on the N60P 60 K 60 background) – 0.44 t/ha. The basal application of N 60 P 60 K 60 for pre-sowing cultivation allowed to increase significantly the production of feed grain in comparison with the non-fertilized background: by 0.42 t/ha in Rovnya standard, by 0.42 t/ha in Saur variety, by 0.94 t/ha in Dobroe variety, by 0.32 t/ha in Hajkar variety, by 0.34 t/ha in Zaozerie variety. The protein content in triticale grain was the highest in the variants with the basal application of fertilizers and nitrogen fertilization (13.9-15.8 %.). Dobroe variety showed the greatest response to the application of mineral fertilizers during both years of research.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
In 2018, Rovnya grain productivity was significantly lower than Hajkar and Zaozerie.
- Taxon
- spring triticale
×Triticosecalet0 - Material
- Rovnyae0
- Outcome
- grain productivitye0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 3.80-4.07 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 4.31-4.81 t/hae0
- Comparator
- Hajkar and Zaozeriee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 2018, grain productivity of the Rovnya (standard), Saur and Dobroe varieties (3.80-4.07 t/ha) was significantly lower than that of the Hajkar and Zaozerie varieties (4.31-4.81 t/ha).”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2018, Saur grain productivity was significantly lower than Hajkar and Zaozerie.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Saure0
- Outcome
- grain productivitye0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 3.80-4.07 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 4.31-4.81 t/hae0
- Comparator
- Hajkar and Zaozeriee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 2018, grain productivity of the Rovnya (standard), Saur and Dobroe varieties (3.80-4.07 t/ha) was significantly lower than that of the Hajkar and Zaozerie varieties (4.31-4.81 t/ha).”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2018, Dobroe grain productivity was significantly lower than Hajkar and Zaozerie.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Dobroee0
- Outcome
- grain productivitye0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 3.80-4.07 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 4.31-4.81 t/hae0
- Comparator
- Hajkar and Zaozeriee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 2018, grain productivity of the Rovnya (standard), Saur and Dobroe varieties (3.80-4.07 t/ha) was significantly lower than that of the Hajkar and Zaozerie varieties (4.31-4.81 t/ha).”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
N30 top dressing increased Hajkar yield by 0.67 t/ha or 15% without basal fertilizer.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Hajkare0
- Treatment
- N 30 in the tillering phasee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.67 t/ha, or +15%e0
- Qualifier
- without mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of N 30 in the tillering phase against the background without mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivation provided a significant increase in yield of the varieties Hajkar (0.67 t/ha, or +15%), Dobroe (0.68 t/ha, or +17%) and Saur (0.77 t/ha, or +20%).”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
N30 top dressing increased Dobroe yield by 0.68 t/ha or 17% without basal fertilizer.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Dobroee0
- Treatment
- N 30 in the tillering phasee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.68 t/ha, or +17%e0
- Qualifier
- without mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of N 30 in the tillering phase against the background without mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivation provided a significant increase in yield of the varieties Hajkar (0.67 t/ha, or +15%), Dobroe (0.68 t/ha, or +17%) and Saur (0.77 t/ha, or +20%).”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
N30 top dressing increased Saur yield by 0.77 t/ha or 20% without basal fertilizer.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Saure0
- Treatment
- N 30 in the tillering phasee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.77 t/ha, or +20%e0
- Qualifier
- without mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of N 30 in the tillering phase against the background without mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivation provided a significant increase in yield of the varieties Hajkar (0.67 t/ha, or +15%), Dobroe (0.68 t/ha, or +17%) and Saur (0.77 t/ha, or +20%).”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal fertilizer payback in increased grain yield was low, at 3.7-7.7 kg.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- mineral fertilizers used for pre-sowing cultivatione0
- Outcome
- paybacke0
- Direction
- not highe0
- Value
- 3.7-7.7 kge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The payback of mineral fertilizers used for pre-sowing cultivation with the increase in grain yield was not high (3.7-7.7 kg).”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Hajkar nitrogen top dressing without basal fertilizer returned 22-25 kg grain per kg fertilizer.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Hajkare0
- Treatment
- nitrogen top dressinge0
- Outcome
- paybacke0
- Value
- 22-25 kg of grain per 1 kg of fertilizerse0
- Qualifier
- without the use of mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivatione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of nitrogen top dressing on the background without the use of mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivation was effective: Hajkar, Saur and Dobroe varieties provided a payback of 22-25 kg of grain per 1 kg of fertilizers.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Saur nitrogen top dressing without basal fertilizer returned 22-25 kg grain per kg fertilizer.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Saure0
- Treatment
- nitrogen top dressinge0
- Outcome
- paybacke0
- Value
- 22-25 kg of grain per 1 kg of fertilizerse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of nitrogen top dressing on the background without the use of mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivation was effective: Hajkar, Saur and Dobroe varieties provided a payback of 22-25 kg of grain per 1 kg of fertilizers.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Dobroe nitrogen top dressing without basal fertilizer returned 22-25 kg grain per kg fertilizer.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Dobroee0
- Treatment
- nitrogen top dressinge0
- Outcome
- paybacke0
- Value
- 22-25 kg of grain per 1 kg of fertilizerse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of nitrogen top dressing on the background without the use of mineral fertilizers for pre-sowing cultivation was effective: Hajkar, Saur and Dobroe varieties provided a payback of 22-25 kg of grain per 1 kg of fertilizers.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Under arid 2019 conditions, variety yields decreased to 2.17-3.84 t/ha but exceeded Rovnya by 0.4-1.0 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 2.17-3.84 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- significantly higher by 0.4-1.0 t/hae0
- Comparator
- Rovnyae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In unfavorable arid agro-climatic conditions of 2019, the yield of the studied varieties decreased to 2.17-3.84 t/ha, but was significantly higher by 0.4-1.0 t/ha of the control variety Rovnya.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization increased Rovnya yield by 0.35 t/ha on an unfertilized background.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Rovnyae0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.35e0
- Qualifier
- N 0 P 0 K 0e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield increase from nitrogen fertilization was less substantial and achieved reliable values (LSD 05 = 0.25 t/ha) in standard Rovnya variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 and N 60 P 60 K 60 backgrounds) − 0.35 and 0.51 t/ha, respectively, Dobroe variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 background) - 0.39 t/ha and Hajkar variety (on the N60P 60 K 60 background) – 0.44 t/ha.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization increased Rovnya yield by 0.51 t/ha on the basal fertilizer background.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Rovnyae0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.51 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- N 60 P 60 K 60e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield increase from nitrogen fertilization was less substantial and achieved reliable values (LSD 05 = 0.25 t/ha) in standard Rovnya variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 and N 60 P 60 K 60 backgrounds) − 0.35 and 0.51 t/ha, respectively, Dobroe variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 background) - 0.39 t/ha and Hajkar variety (on the N60P 60 K 60 background) – 0.44 t/ha.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization increased Dobroe yield by 0.39 t/ha on an unfertilized background.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Dobroee0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.39 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- N 0 P 0 K 0e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield increase from nitrogen fertilization was less substantial and achieved reliable values (LSD 05 = 0.25 t/ha) in standard Rovnya variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 and N 60 P 60 K 60 backgrounds) − 0.35 and 0.51 t/ha, respectively, Dobroe variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 background) - 0.39 t/ha and Hajkar variety (on the N60P 60 K 60 background) – 0.44 t/ha.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization increased Hajkar yield by 0.44 t/ha on the basal fertilizer background.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Hajkare0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.44 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- N60P 60 K 60e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield increase from nitrogen fertilization was less substantial and achieved reliable values (LSD 05 = 0.25 t/ha) in standard Rovnya variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 and N 60 P 60 K 60 backgrounds) − 0.35 and 0.51 t/ha, respectively, Dobroe variety (on the N 0 P 0 K 0 background) - 0.39 t/ha and Hajkar variety (on the N60P 60 K 60 background) – 0.44 t/ha.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal fertilizer increased Rovnya feed grain production by 0.42 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Rovnyae0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 60 K 60e0
- Outcome
- production of feed graine0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.42 t/hae0
- Comparator
- non-fertilized backgrounde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The basal application of N 60 P 60 K 60 for pre-sowing cultivation allowed to increase significantly the production of feed grain in comparison with the non-fertilized background: by 0.42 t/ha in Rovnya standard, by 0.42 t/ha in Saur variety, by 0.94 t/ha in Dobroe variety, by 0.32 t/ha in Hajkar variety, by 0.34 t/ha in Zaozerie variety.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal fertilizer increased Saur feed grain production by 0.42 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Saure0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 60 K 60e0
- Outcome
- production of feed graine0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.42 t/hae0
- Comparator
- non-fertilized backgrounde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The basal application of N 60 P 60 K 60 for pre-sowing cultivation allowed to increase significantly the production of feed grain in comparison with the non-fertilized background: by 0.42 t/ha in Rovnya standard, by 0.42 t/ha in Saur variety, by 0.94 t/ha in Dobroe variety, by 0.32 t/ha in Hajkar variety, by 0.34 t/ha in Zaozerie variety.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal fertilizer increased Dobroe feed grain production by 0.94 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Dobroee0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 60 K 60e0
- Outcome
- production of feed graine0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.94 t/hae0
- Comparator
- non-fertilized backgrounde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The basal application of N 60 P 60 K 60 for pre-sowing cultivation allowed to increase significantly the production of feed grain in comparison with the non-fertilized background: by 0.42 t/ha in Rovnya standard, by 0.42 t/ha in Saur variety, by 0.94 t/ha in Dobroe variety, by 0.32 t/ha in Hajkar variety, by 0.34 t/ha in Zaozerie variety.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal fertilizer increased Hajkar feed grain production by 0.32 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Hajkare0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 60 K 60e0
- Outcome
- production of feed graine0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.32 t/hae0
- Comparator
- non-fertilized backgrounde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The basal application of N 60 P 60 K 60 for pre-sowing cultivation allowed to increase significantly the production of feed grain in comparison with the non-fertilized background: by 0.42 t/ha in Rovnya standard, by 0.42 t/ha in Saur variety, by 0.94 t/ha in Dobroe variety, by 0.32 t/ha in Hajkar variety, by 0.34 t/ha in Zaozerie variety.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal fertilizer increased Zaozerie feed grain production by 0.34 t/ha; protein was highest with basal plus nitrogen fertilizer, and Dobroe was most responsive across years.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Zaozeriee0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 60 K 60e0
- Outcome
- production of feed graine0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.34 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 13.9-15.8 %.e1
- Comparator
- non-fertilized backgrounde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Schema note from the model: Claim budget requires grouping remaining protein and cultivar response results.
Verbatim
e0“The basal application of N 60 P 60 K 60 for pre-sowing cultivation allowed to increase significantly the production of feed grain in comparison with the non-fertilized background: by 0.42 t/ha in Rovnya standard, by 0.42 t/ha in Saur variety, by 0.94 t/ha in Dobroe variety, by 0.32 t/ha in Hajkar variety, by 0.34 t/ha in Zaozerie variety.”
e1“The protein content in triticale grain was the highest in the variants with the basal application of fertilizers and nitrogen fertilization (13.9-15.8 %.). Dobroe variety showed the greatest response to the application of mineral fertilizers during both years of research.”
t0“spring triticale”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →tillage · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.