Abstract
In modern socio-economic conditions, the production of high-quality grain remains the main task of agricultural production. The main way to solve it is to increase productivity by introducing new varieties and crops with high potential and improving the cultivation technology with minimal costs. Agrarians of the North-East of the Non-Chernozem Zone of Russia, having in their land, use poorly fertile sod-podzolic soils of varying degrees of cultivation. To increase the productivity of grain crops, they use adapted resource-saving technologies, in which the level of mineral fertilizer is determined by the magnitude of the dose of the nutrient established experimentally. The high productivity of the variety, along with the quality of the grain, is the most important indicator of the ultimate goal of every breeder. To assess the economic efficiency of the cultivation of spring triticale, studies were carried out on nine varieties: Saur, Dobroe, Zaozerye, KNIISH 9, KNIISH 11, KNIISH 22, Savva, Timur, Rovnya. The results of our studies convincingly indicate that in the conditions of the republic, even against an unfertilized background, cultivated varieties of spring triticale, provide grain yield from 2.5 to 3.8 t/ha. Some of the most important economic indicators characterizing production efficiency are such indicators as the cost of production and the degree of efficiency of grain production, expressed by the level of profitability. The main application of mineral fertilizers (N 60 P 60 K 60 , (P 60 K 60 ) and the introduction of nitrogen fertilization in tillering at a dose of N 30 increases the cost of 1 kg of grain by 5-8%, thereby reducing the profitability of production when cultivating varieties. The cultivation of varieties Rovnya, Zaur, Zaozerye, KNIISH 22, KNIISH 11, Timur was economically profitable, but less profitable than varieties KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savva. The cost of production of a kilogram of grain was on the option without mineral nutrition from 5.1; 7.0; 5.9; 5.1; 4.8; and 6.4 rubles, respectively. On fertilized options, the cost decreased to a minimum of 4.1 rubles in the Timur variety with the main application of N 60 P 60 K 60 with nitrogen fertilization N 30 during tillering. The maximum increase in the cost price was shown by the varieties Timur, Zaozerye: 4.8 and 4.9 rubles against the background of the main application of N 60 P 60 K 60 . On average for 2020 according to the results of economic analysis, the lowest cost price and the highest level of profitability indicator are observed when cultivating varieties KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savva at all levels of mineral nutrition.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Unfertilized spring triticale varieties yielded 2.5 to 3.8 t/ha grain.
- Taxon
- spring triticale
×Triticosecalee0 - Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 2.5 to 3.8 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- unfertilized backgrounde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“even against an unfertilized background, cultivated varieties of spring triticale, provide grain yield from 2.5 to 3.8 t/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilizer and tillering nitrogen increased grain cost by 5-8%.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- mineral fertilizers (N 60 P 60 K 60 , (P 60 K 60 ) and the introduction of nitrogen fertilization in tillering at a dose of N 30e0
- Outcome
- cost of 1 kg of graine0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 5-8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The main application of mineral fertilizers (N 60 P 60 K 60 , (P 60 K 60 ) and the introduction of nitrogen fertilization in tillering at a dose of N 30 increases the cost of 1 kg of grain by 5-8%, thereby reducing the profitability of production when cultivating varieties.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilizer and tillering nitrogen reduced profitability.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- mineral fertilizers (N 60 P 60 K 60 , (P 60 K 60 ) and the introduction of nitrogen fertilization in tillering at a dose of N 30e0
- Outcome
- profitability of productione0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The main application of mineral fertilizers (N 60 P 60 K 60 , (P 60 K 60 ) and the introduction of nitrogen fertilization in tillering at a dose of N 30 increases the cost of 1 kg of grain by 5-8%, thereby reducing the profitability of production when cultivating varieties.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Rovnya, Zaur, Zaozerye, KNIISH 22, KNIISH 11 and Timur were profitable but less so than KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savva.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Rovnya, Zaur, Zaozerye, KNIISH 22, KNIISH 11, Timure0
- Outcome
- profitablee0
- Direction
- less profitablee0
- Comparator
- KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savvae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cultivation of varieties Rovnya, Zaur, Zaozerye, KNIISH 22, KNIISH 11, Timur was economically profitable, but less profitable than varieties KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savva.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Without mineral nutrition, grain costs for six listed varieties were 5.1, 7.0, 5.9, 5.1, 4.8 and 6.4 rubles per kilogram respectively.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- cost of production of a kilogram of graine0
- Value
- 5.1; 7.0; 5.9; 5.1; 4.8; and 6.4 rublese0
- Qualifier
- without mineral nutritione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cost of production of a kilogram of grain was on the option without mineral nutrition from 5.1; 7.0; 5.9; 5.1; 4.8; and 6.4 rubles, respectively.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilized Timur reached a minimum production cost of 4.1 rubles.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Timure0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 60 K 60 with nitrogen fertilization N 30 during tilleringe0
- Outcome
- coste0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 4.1 rublese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On fertilized options, the cost decreased to a minimum of 4.1 rubles in the Timur variety with the main application of N 60 P 60 K 60 with nitrogen fertilization N 30 during tillering.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Timur showed a maximum cost price increase of 4.8 rubles under NPK fertilization.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Timure0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 60 K 60e0
- Outcome
- cost pricee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 4.8 and 4.9 rublese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum increase in the cost price was shown by the varieties Timur, Zaozerye: 4.8 and 4.9 rubles against the background of the main application of N 60 P 60 K 60 .”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Zaozerye showed a maximum cost price increase of 4.9 rubles under NPK fertilization.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Zaozeryee0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 60 K 60e0
- Outcome
- cost pricee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 4.8 and 4.9 rublese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum increase in the cost price was shown by the varieties Timur, Zaozerye: 4.8 and 4.9 rubles against the background of the main application of N 60 P 60 K 60 .”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savva had the lowest costs across mineral nutrition levels.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savvae0
- Outcome
- cost pricee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Qualifier
- at all levels of mineral nutritione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest cost price and the highest level of profitability indicator are observed when cultivating varieties KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savva at all levels of mineral nutrition.”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savva had the highest profitability across mineral nutrition levels.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savvae0
- Outcome
- profitability indicatore0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- at all levels of mineral nutritione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest cost price and the highest level of profitability indicator are observed when cultivating varieties KNIISH 9, Dobroe and Savva at all levels of mineral nutrition.”
t0“spring triticale”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →tillage · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →nitrogen · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.