Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Integrated approaches for management of anthracnose of chilli (Capsicum annuum L)

Gaddam Pooja; Sobita Simon

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in the field to test the effect of organic amendments, (viz. FYM, poultry manure, sheep manure, neem cake and ground nut cake) with Pseudomonas fluorescens and carbendazim are used against Colletotrichum capsici, anthracnose disease of chili and chilli growth parameters. Eight treatments were under taken with three replications and data was analyzed using RBD. Minimum disease intensity was recorded in T1 – NPK+ carbendazim (26.13%) with maximum yield (103.83 q/ha) followed by T5 - FYM + Pseudomonas fluorescens (26.40%) with yield (95.79 qa/ha),T3 - Pseudomonas fluorescens seedling treatment + Pseudomonas fluorescens (28.56%), with yield (92.52qa/ha), T2 - Neem cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescens (32%), with yield (90.25 qa/ha), T6 Sheep manure + Pseudomonas fluorescens (33.14%) with yield (85.44 qa/ha), T7-Poultry manure + Pseudomonas fluorescens (35.55%) with yield (82.11 qa/ha), T4-Groundnut cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescens-(37.77%) with yield (77.86 qa/ha) maximum disease intensity was recorded in control (49.03) with lowest yield ((36.71 qa/ha)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus carbendazim had the minimum disease intensity of 26.13%.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
NPK+ carbendazime0
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
26.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum disease intensity was recorded in T1 – NPK+ carbendazim (26.13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus carbendazim gave the maximum yield of 103.83 q/ha.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
NPK+ carbendazime0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
103.83 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“T1 – NPK+ carbendazim (26.13%) with maximum yield (103.83 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus Pseudomonas fluorescens had 26.40% disease intensity.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
FYM + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
26.40%e0
Value
26.40%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T5 - FYM + Pseudomonas fluorescens (26.40%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus Pseudomonas fluorescens produced 95.79 qa/ha yield.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
FYM + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
95.79 qa/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“T5 - FYM + Pseudomonas fluorescens (26.40%) with yield (95.79 qa/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas seedling treatment gave 28.56% disease intensity and 92.52qa/ha yield.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens seedling treatment + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
92.52qa/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“T3 - Pseudomonas fluorescens seedling treatment + Pseudomonas fluorescens (28.56%), with yield (92.52qa/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake plus Pseudomonas gave 32% disease intensity and 90.25 qa/ha yield.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Neem cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
90.25 qa/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“T2 - Neem cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescens (32%), with yield (90.25 qa/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheep manure plus Pseudomonas gave 33.14% disease intensity and 85.44 qa/ha yield.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Sheep manure + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
85.44 qa/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“T6 Sheep manure + Pseudomonas fluorescens (33.14%) with yield (85.44 qa/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure plus Pseudomonas gave 35.55% disease intensity and 82.11 qa/ha yield.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Poultry manure + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
82.11 qa/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“T7-Poultry manure + Pseudomonas fluorescens (35.55%) with yield (82.11 qa/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut cake plus Pseudomonas gave 37.77% disease intensity and 77.86 qa/ha yield.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Groundnut cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
77.86 qa/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“T4-Groundnut cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescens-(37.77%) with yield (77.86 qa/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had the maximum disease intensity of 49.03.

Taxon
chillit0
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
49.03e0

Verbatim

e0

“maximum disease intensity was recorded in control (49.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had the lowest yield of 36.71 qa/ha.

Taxon
chillit0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
36.71 qa/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“control (49.03) with lowest yield ((36.71 qa/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–81 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

carbendazim · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

163 papers: 152 positive, 11 negative or no effect

151 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

159 papers more in this group

See all 163 papers →

fertilization · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.