Abstract
The experiment was conducted in the field to test the effect of organic amendments, (viz. FYM, poultry manure, sheep manure, neem cake and ground nut cake) with Pseudomonas fluorescens and carbendazim are used against Colletotrichum capsici, anthracnose disease of chili and chilli growth parameters. Eight treatments were under taken with three replications and data was analyzed using RBD. Minimum disease intensity was recorded in T1 – NPK+ carbendazim (26.13%) with maximum yield (103.83 q/ha) followed by T5 - FYM + Pseudomonas fluorescens (26.40%) with yield (95.79 qa/ha),T3 - Pseudomonas fluorescens seedling treatment + Pseudomonas fluorescens (28.56%), with yield (92.52qa/ha), T2 - Neem cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescens (32%), with yield (90.25 qa/ha), T6 Sheep manure + Pseudomonas fluorescens (33.14%) with yield (85.44 qa/ha), T7-Poultry manure + Pseudomonas fluorescens (35.55%) with yield (82.11 qa/ha), T4-Groundnut cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescens-(37.77%) with yield (77.86 qa/ha) maximum disease intensity was recorded in control (49.03) with lowest yield ((36.71 qa/ha)
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
NPK plus carbendazim had the minimum disease intensity of 26.13%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Minimum disease intensity was recorded in T1 – NPK+ carbendazim (26.13%)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK plus carbendazim gave the maximum yield of 103.83 q/ha.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T1 – NPK+ carbendazim (26.13%) with maximum yield (103.83 q/ha)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus Pseudomonas fluorescens had 26.40% disease intensity.
- Taxon
- chillit0
- Treatment
- FYM + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- 26.40%e0
- Value
- 26.40%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T5 - FYM + Pseudomonas fluorescens (26.40%)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus Pseudomonas fluorescens produced 95.79 qa/ha yield.
Verbatim
e0“T5 - FYM + Pseudomonas fluorescens (26.40%) with yield (95.79 qa/ha)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas seedling treatment gave 28.56% disease intensity and 92.52qa/ha yield.
Verbatim
e0“T3 - Pseudomonas fluorescens seedling treatment + Pseudomonas fluorescens (28.56%), with yield (92.52qa/ha)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem cake plus Pseudomonas gave 32% disease intensity and 90.25 qa/ha yield.
Verbatim
e0“T2 - Neem cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescens (32%), with yield (90.25 qa/ha)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sheep manure plus Pseudomonas gave 33.14% disease intensity and 85.44 qa/ha yield.
Verbatim
e0“T6 Sheep manure + Pseudomonas fluorescens (33.14%) with yield (85.44 qa/ha)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Poultry manure plus Pseudomonas gave 35.55% disease intensity and 82.11 qa/ha yield.
Verbatim
e0“T7-Poultry manure + Pseudomonas fluorescens (35.55%) with yield (82.11 qa/ha)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut cake plus Pseudomonas gave 37.77% disease intensity and 77.86 qa/ha yield.
Verbatim
e0“T4-Groundnut cake+ Pseudomonas fluorescens-(37.77%) with yield (77.86 qa/ha)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Control had the maximum disease intensity of 49.03.
Verbatim
e0“maximum disease intensity was recorded in control (49.03)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Control had the lowest yield of 36.71 qa/ha.
Verbatim
e0“control (49.03) with lowest yield ((36.71 qa/ha)”
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L)”
The same questions in other papers
carbendazim · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →carbendazim · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ
151 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
159 papers more in this group
See all 163 papers →fertilization · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.