Abstract
Compost, compost tea and poultry litter in comparison with Bavistin were evaluated for controlling diseases of chili. The experiments were conducted at Field Lab. and Eco-friendly Plant Disease Management Lab. of the Department of Plant Pathology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh in 2011- 2012 using eight different treatments following Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The treatments were (1) Compost tea (1 : 5 w/v) as foliar spray, (2) Soil drenching with Compost tea (1 : 5 w/v), (3) Soil drenching with poultry litter extract (1 : 5 w/v), (4) Bavistin (0.1%) as foliar spray, (5) Soil drenching with Bavistin (0.1%), (6) Compost (10 t/ha) in soil application, (7) Poultry litter (10 t/ha) in soil application and (8) control. Minimum leaf curl incidence (80.89%) and severity grade (2) were recorded in plots under Compost tea @ 1:5 w/v as foliar spray, but severity and severity grade were maximum by 95.00% and 3, respectively under control plots. Minimum anthracnose infected plants (16.67%) and infected fruit (9.35%) were recorded in plots under Compost @ 10 t/ha in soil application and soil drenching with poultry litter extract (1.5 w/v). The highest Cercospora leaf spot having severity rating grade 3.15 was recorded in field where compost tea was applied as soil drenching and lowest grade 1.07 was determined where Bavistin was applied as foliar spray. The fruit yield (4.67 t/ha) was found significantly higher in plots under compost tea as foliar spray and Bavistin as foliar spray which was 79.62% higher yield over control. Physical and chemical compositions of compost tea and poultry litter were determined.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/pa.v24i1-2.19096 Progress. Agric. 24(1&2): 39 - 44, 2013
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Compost tea as foliar spray gave the minimum leaf curl incidence of 80.89% in chili.
- Taxon
- chilit0
- Treatment
- Compost tea @ 1:5 w/v as foliar spraye1
- Outcome
- leaf curl incidencee1
- Direction
- Minimume1
- Value
- 80.89%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e1“Minimum leaf curl incidence (80.89%) and severity grade (2) were recorded in plots under Compost tea @ 1:5 w/v as foliar spray”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost tea as foliar spray gave the minimum leaf curl severity grade of 2 in chili.
- Taxon
- chilit0
- Treatment
- Compost tea @ 1:5 w/v as foliar spraye1
- Outcome
- severity gradee1
- Direction
- Minimume1
- Value
- 2e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e1“Minimum leaf curl incidence (80.89%) and severity grade (2) were recorded in plots under Compost tea @ 1:5 w/v as foliar spray”
Claim · model-written summary
In control plots, leaf curl severity was maximum at 95.00% in chili.
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e2“severity and severity grade were maximum by 95.00% and 3, respectively under control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
In control plots, the severity grade was maximum at 3 in chili.
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e2“severity and severity grade were maximum by 95.00% and 3, respectively under control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost at 10 t/ha in soil application gave the minimum anthracnose infected plants of 16.67% in chili.
- Taxon
- chilit0
- Treatment
- Compost @ 10 t/ha in soil applicatione3
- Outcome
- anthracnose infected plantse3
- Direction
- Minimume3
- Value
- 16.67%e3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e3“Minimum anthracnose infected plants (16.67%) and infected fruit (9.35%) were recorded in plots under Compost @ 10 t/ha in soil application”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil drenching with poultry litter extract gave the minimum anthracnose infected fruit of 9.35% in chili.
- Taxon
- chilit0
- Treatment
- soil drenching with poultry litter extracte4
- Outcome
- infected fruite3
- Direction
- Minimume3
- Value
- 9.35%e3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e3“Minimum anthracnose infected plants (16.67%) and infected fruit (9.35%) were recorded in plots under Compost @ 10 t/ha in soil application”
e4“soil drenching with poultry litter extract”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil drenching with compost tea gave the highest Cercospora leaf spot severity rating grade of 3.15 in chili in the field.
- Taxon
- chilit0
- Treatment
- compost tea was applied as soil drenchinge5
- Interactor
- Cercospora
Cercosporae5pathogen - Outcome
- Cercospora leaf spot having severity rating gradee5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 3.15e5
- Setting
- fielde5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e5“The highest Cercospora leaf spot having severity rating grade 3.15 was recorded in field where compost tea was applied as soil drenching”
Claim · model-written summary
Bavistin as foliar spray gave the lowest Cercospora leaf spot severity rating grade of 1.07 in chili.
- Taxon
- chilit0
- Treatment
- Bavistin was applied as foliar spraye6
- Interactor
- CercosporaCercosporae5pathogen
- Outcome
- severity rating gradee5
- Direction
- loweste6
- Value
- 1.07e6
- Setting
- fielde5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e5“The highest Cercospora leaf spot having severity rating grade 3.15 was recorded in field where compost tea was applied as soil drenching”
e6“lowest grade 1.07 was determined where Bavistin was applied as foliar spray”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost tea as foliar spray gave significantly higher chili fruit yield of 4.67 t/ha than control.
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e7“The fruit yield (4.67 t/ha) was found significantly higher in plots under compost tea as foliar spray and Bavistin as foliar spray which was 79.62% higher yield over control”
Claim · model-written summary
Bavistin as foliar spray gave significantly higher chili fruit yield of 4.67 t/ha than control.
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Diseases of Chili”
e7“The fruit yield (4.67 t/ha) was found significantly higher in plots under compost tea as foliar spray and Bavistin as foliar spray which was 79.62% higher yield over control”
The same questions in other papers
carbendazim · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →carbendazim · Cercospora · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ
151 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
159 papers more in this group
See all 163 papers →fertilization · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →application · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →application · Cercospora · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
34 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.