Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of drip irrigation, spacing and nitrogen fertigation on yield of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). The results revealed that drip irrigation enhanced the fruit yield, net income and minimized the time, weeds and diseases of the crop. Closer spacing at 30 cm produced higher yield (58.77%) and net income as compared to 45 cm spacing. Fertigation resulted in maximum yield (10.20 kg/m ), minimal disease and saved water and total irrigation time as compared to top dressing. The drip irrigation had significantly increased yield (10.50 kg/m ) and net income (60.30%) as compared to flood irrigation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation enhanced chilli fruit yield and net income.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”
e0“drip irrigation enhanced the fruit yield, net income and minimized the time, weeds and diseases of the crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation minimized time, weeds and diseases of the crop.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”
e0“drip irrigation enhanced the fruit yield, net income and minimized the time, weeds and diseases of the crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Closer spacing at 30 cm produced 58.77 % higher chilli yield than 45 cm spacing.
Verbatim
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”
e1“Closer spacing at 30 cm produced higher yield (58.77%) and net income as compared to 45 cm spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
Closer spacing at 30 cm gave higher chilli net income than 45 cm spacing.
Verbatim
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”
e1“Closer spacing at 30 cm produced higher yield (58.77%) and net income as compared to 45 cm spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation gave the maximum chilli yield of 10.20 kg/m compared with top dressing.
Verbatim
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”
e2“Fertigation resulted in maximum yield (10.20 kg/m ), minimal disease and saved water and total irrigation time as compared to top dressing”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation gave minimal chilli disease compared with top dressing.
Verbatim
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”
e2“Fertigation resulted in maximum yield (10.20 kg/m ), minimal disease and saved water and total irrigation time as compared to top dressing”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation saved water and total irrigation time compared with top dressing.
Verbatim
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”
e2“Fertigation resulted in maximum yield (10.20 kg/m ), minimal disease and saved water and total irrigation time as compared to top dressing”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation significantly increased chilli yield of 10.50 kg/m compared with flood irrigation.
Verbatim
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”
e3“The drip irrigation had significantly increased yield (10.50 kg/m ) and net income (60.30%) as compared to flood irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation increased chilli net income by 60.30 % compared with flood irrigation.
Verbatim
t0“chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”
e3“The drip irrigation had significantly increased yield (10.50 kg/m ) and net income (60.30%) as compared to flood irrigation”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ
151 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
159 papers more in this group
See all 163 papers →density · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →irrigation · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →irrigation · weed · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.