Paper · 2020 · Jurnal Perlindungan Tanaman Indonesia

Beneficial Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Trichoderma on Diseased Shallot

Chaieydha Noer Afiefah; Suryanti Suryanti; Tri Joko; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Purple blotch and fusarium basal rot are important shallot diseases which have caused significant yield loss. An alternative control method for these diseases is the use of biocontrol agents, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and Trichoderma. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of AMF and Trichoderma sp. on shallot growth and disease suppression. The experiment was set as a Complete Randomized Block Design with three treatments and three replications. The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control. Each treatment was applied to a row and 15 shallot plants were taken as samples for observation. Disease severity of purple blotch and fusarium basal rot, plant height, number of leaves and shallot resistances to Fusarium solani were observed during this study. Results demonstrated that at seven weeks after planting, the application of AMF and Trichoderma sp. tended to suppress fusarium basal rot to 0.89% and 1.78% respectively, but only the application of AMF that suppressed purple blotch disease to 0.44%. The application of AMF and Trichoderma sp. also tended to increase plant height, number of leaves, leaf fresh weight and dry weight, root length, and bulb weight. In addition, AMF and Trichoderma sp. application increased shallot resistances against Fusarium solani.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF application tended to suppress fusarium basal rot in shallot to 0.89% at seven weeks after planting compared with control.

Treatment
AMFe1
Interactor
fusariumFusariume1pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
fusarium basal rote1
Direction
suppresse1
Value
0.89%e1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diseased Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of AMF and Trichoderma sp. tended to suppress fusarium basal rot to 0.89% and 1.78% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma sp. application tended to suppress fusarium basal rot in shallot to 1.78% at seven weeks after planting compared with control.

Treatment
Trichoderma sp.e1
Interactor
fusariumFusariume1pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma sp.Trichodermae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fusarium basal rote1
Direction
suppresse1
Value
1.78%e1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diseased Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of AMF and Trichoderma sp. tended to suppress fusarium basal rot to 0.89% and 1.78% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only AMF application suppressed purple blotch disease in shallot, to 0.44%.

Treatment
AMFe3
Outcome
purple blotch diseasee3
Direction
suppressede3
Value
0.44%e3
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diseased Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“only the application of AMF that suppressed purple blotch disease to 0.44%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF application tended to increase shallot plant height, number of leaves, and leaf fresh and dry weight.

Treatment
AMFe2
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, leaf fresh weight and dry weighte2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
tended toe2
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diseased Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of AMF and Trichoderma sp. also tended to increase plant height, number of leaves, leaf fresh weight and dry weight, root length, and bulb weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF application tended to increase shallot root length and bulb weight.

Treatment
AMFe2
Outcome
root length, and bulb weighte2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
tended toe2
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diseased Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of AMF and Trichoderma sp. also tended to increase plant height, number of leaves, leaf fresh weight and dry weight, root length, and bulb weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma sp. application tended to increase shallot plant height, number of leaves, and leaf fresh and dry weight.

Treatment
Trichoderma sp.e2
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, leaf fresh weight and dry weighte2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
tended toe2
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diseased Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of AMF and Trichoderma sp. also tended to increase plant height, number of leaves, leaf fresh weight and dry weight, root length, and bulb weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma sp. application tended to increase shallot root length and bulb weight.

Treatment
Trichoderma sp.e2
Outcome
root length, and bulb weighte2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
tended toe2
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diseased Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of AMF and Trichoderma sp. also tended to increase plant height, number of leaves, leaf fresh weight and dry weight, root length, and bulb weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF application increased shallot resistance against Fusarium solani.

Treatment
AMFe4
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie4pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe4symbiont
Outcome
resistances against Fusarium solanie4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
e4

“AMF and Trichoderma sp. application increased shallot resistances against Fusarium solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma sp. application increased shallot resistance against Fusarium solani.

Treatment
Trichoderma sp.e4
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie4pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma sp.Trichodermae4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
resistances against Fusarium solanie4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were AMF, Trichoderma sp., and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
e4

“AMF and Trichoderma sp. application increased shallot resistances against Fusarium solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1321 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Trichoderma · Fusarium · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Trichoderma · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

53 papers: 48 positive, 5 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

mycorrhiza · Fusarium · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.