Abstract
To produce optimally good quality shallots, proper cultivation techniques are required. Efforts that can be made include modifying the environment in which plants grow. Alternative efforts to increase the quantity and quality of agricultural products, especially shallots can be done by using organic fertilizers and the use of Trichoderma sp. as a plant growth promoting agent, as well as improving the quality of organic fertilizers. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of Trichoderma in increasing the ability of plants to absorb nutrients from the growing media and to determine the best type of organic fertilizer to increase the growth and yield of shallots. The research was conducted at the experimental field of the Faculty of Agriculture, UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta, Wedomartani, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, at an altitude of approximately 104 meters above sea level. The time of the research is from May to July 2021. This study was arranged in a factorial Completely Randomized Block Design with 3 replications. The first factor is the type of manure (P1: without manure, P2: cow manure and P3: goat manure). The second factor was inoculation of Trichoderma sp isolates (I0: without inoculation of Trichoderma sp. isolates. and I1: by inoculation of Trichoderma sp. isolates). Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the addition of cow and goat manure was able to produce more leaves and plant height than without the addition of manure, although it did not show a significant effect on the yield of shallot bulbs. There is no significant difference between cow manure and goat manure. Trichoderma inoculation has not had a significant effect on the growth and yield of shallots
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure produced more leaves and taller shallots than no manure.
- Taxon
- Shallot
Allium cepa var. aggregatumt0 - Treatment
- cow manuree1
- Outcome
- more leaves and plant heighte0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- without the addition of manuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the addition of cow and goat manure was able to produce more leaves and plant height than without the addition of manure, although it did not show a significant effect on the yield of shallot bulbs.”
t0“Shallot”
e1“There is no significant difference between cow manure and goat manure.”
Claim · model-written summary
Goat manure produced more leaves and taller shallots than no manure.
- Taxon
- ShallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- goat manuree0
- Outcome
- more leaves and plant heighte0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- without the addition of manuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the addition of cow and goat manure was able to produce more leaves and plant height than without the addition of manure, although it did not show a significant effect on the yield of shallot bulbs.”
t0“Shallot”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure had no significant effect on shallot bulb yield.
- Taxon
- ShallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- cow and goat manuree0
- Outcome
- yield of shallot bulbse0
- Direction
- did not show a significant effecte0
- Comparator
- without the addition of manuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the addition of cow and goat manure was able to produce more leaves and plant height than without the addition of manure, although it did not show a significant effect on the yield of shallot bulbs.”
t0“Shallot”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow and goat manure did not differ significantly.
- Taxon
- ShallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- cow manuree0
- Outcome
- no significant differencee0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- goat manuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There is no significant difference between cow manure and goat manure.”
t0“Shallot”
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma inoculation did not significantly affect shallot growth and yield.
- Taxon
- shallotsAllium cepa var. aggregatume0
- Treatment
- Trichoderma inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Trichoderma
Trichodermae0symbiont - Outcome
- growth and yield of shallotse0
- Direction
- has not had a significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trichoderma inoculation has not had a significant effect on the growth and yield of shallots”
The same questions in other papers
Trichoderma · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →inoculation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
290 papers more in this group
See all 294 papers →fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 464 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
526 papers more in this group
See all 530 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.