Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

On-farm crop response to plant nutrients in pre-dominant cropping systems

P. P. Chaudhari; J. S. Kumbhar; US Surve; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The Pearlmillet and Wheat cropping sequence has gained popularity in scarcity zone of Western Maharashtra. A Field experiment was conducted on cultivator’s field during Kharif and Rabi season of 2017-18 on medium black soil in scarcity zone of Satara district in Western Maharashtra to study the crop response to plant nutrients in pearlmillet-wheat cropping systems. The field experiment was carried out on farmer’s field in Randomized block design with twenty four replication and seven treatments The treatment comprised of recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis (25 Kg and 20 kg ZnSO4 / ha for pearlmillet and wheat, respectively.) has obtained significantly higher yield of grain (26.78 q/ha) and straw (42.96 q/ha) of pearlmillet. Such yields of pearlmillet have shown an increase of 35.10 and 52.90 percent, respectively over control treatment. The same treatment accrued significantly higher yield of wheat grain (33.33 q/ha) and straw (52.01 q/ha) as compared to other treatments, which has indicated an increase of 34.28 and 54.46 percent of grain and straw, respectively over control treatment. The highest gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio were observed in respect of kharif pearlmillet were `43,931.08, `36,855.46 and 1.19, respectively. In case of rabi wheat the highest gross returns, cost of cultivation, net returns and B:C ratio were `67,800.81, `40,010.63 `27790.19 and 1.69.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearlmillet grain yield was significantly higher (26.78 q/ha) under the recommended NPK plus zinc treatment than under the control.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basise1
Outcome
yield of graine0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
26.78 q/hae0
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“has obtained significantly higher yield of grain (26.78 q/ha) and straw (42.96 q/ha) of pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“Such yields of pearlmillet have shown an increase of 35.10 and 52.90 percent, respectively over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearlmillet straw yield was significantly higher (42.96 q/ha) under the recommended NPK plus zinc treatment than under the control.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basise1
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
42.96 q/hae0
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“has obtained significantly higher yield of grain (26.78 q/ha) and straw (42.96 q/ha) of pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“Such yields of pearlmillet have shown an increase of 35.10 and 52.90 percent, respectively over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearlmillet grain yield increased by 35.10 percent over the control treatment.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basise1
Outcome
yield of graine0
Direction
increasee2
Value
35.10e2
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“has obtained significantly higher yield of grain (26.78 q/ha) and straw (42.96 q/ha) of pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“Such yields of pearlmillet have shown an increase of 35.10 and 52.90 percent, respectively over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearlmillet straw yield increased by 52.90 percent over the control treatment.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basise1
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
increasee2
Value
52.90e2
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“has obtained significantly higher yield of grain (26.78 q/ha) and straw (42.96 q/ha) of pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“Such yields of pearlmillet have shown an increase of 35.10 and 52.90 percent, respectively over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was significantly higher (33.33 q/ha) under the recommended NPK plus zinc treatment than under other treatments.

Treatment
recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basise1
Outcome
yield of wheat graine3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
33.33 q/hae3
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–669 · show in text ↑
e3

“The same treatment accrued significantly higher yield of wheat grain (33.33 q/ha) and straw (52.01 q/ha) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw yield was significantly higher (52.01 q/ha) under the recommended NPK plus zinc treatment than under other treatments.

Treatment
recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basise1
Outcome
strawe3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
52.01 q/hae3
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–669 · show in text ↑
e3

“The same treatment accrued significantly higher yield of wheat grain (33.33 q/ha) and straw (52.01 q/ha) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield increased by 34.28 percent over the control treatment.

Treatment
recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basise1
Outcome
graine4
Direction
increasee4
Value
34.28e4
Comparator
control treatmente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–669 · show in text ↑
e3

“The same treatment accrued significantly higher yield of wheat grain (33.33 q/ha) and straw (52.01 q/ha) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1092 · show in text ↑
e4

“which has indicated an increase of 34.28 and 54.46 percent of grain and straw, respectively over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw yield increased by 54.46 percent over the control treatment.

Treatment
recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basise1
Outcome
strawe4
Direction
increasee4
Value
54.46e4
Comparator
control treatmente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–669 · show in text ↑
e3

“The same treatment accrued significantly higher yield of wheat grain (33.33 q/ha) and straw (52.01 q/ha) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1092 · show in text ↑
e4

“which has indicated an increase of 34.28 and 54.46 percent of grain and straw, respectively over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kharif pearlmillet had the highest gross returns, at 43,931.08.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Value
43,931.08e0
Setting
kharife0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio were observed in respect of kharif pearlmillet were `43,931.08, `36,855.46 and 1.19, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kharif pearlmillet had the highest net returns, at 36,855.46.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
36,855.46e0
Setting
kharife0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio were observed in respect of kharif pearlmillet were `43,931.08, `36,855.46 and 1.19, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kharif pearlmillet had the highest B:C ratio, at 1.19.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
1.19e0
Setting
kharife0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio were observed in respect of kharif pearlmillet were `43,931.08, `36,855.46 and 1.19, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rabi wheat had the highest gross returns, at 67,800.81.

Outcome
gross returnse0
Value
67,800.81e0
Setting
rabie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of rabi wheat the highest gross returns, cost of cultivation, net returns and B:C ratio were `67,800.81, `40,010.63 `27790.19 and 1.69”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rabi wheat cost of cultivation was 40,010.63.

Outcome
cost of cultivatione0
Value
40,010.63e0
Setting
rabie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of rabi wheat the highest gross returns, cost of cultivation, net returns and B:C ratio were `67,800.81, `40,010.63 `27790.19 and 1.69”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rabi wheat had net returns of 27790.19.

Outcome
net returnse0
Value
27790.19e0
Setting
rabie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of rabi wheat the highest gross returns, cost of cultivation, net returns and B:C ratio were `67,800.81, `40,010.63 `27790.19 and 1.69”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rabi wheat had a B:C ratio of 1.69.

Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
1.69e0
Setting
rabie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of rabi wheat the highest gross returns, cost of cultivation, net returns and B:C ratio were `67,800.81, `40,010.63 `27790.19 and 1.69”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1504 · show in text ↑

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

potassium · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 65 positive, 1 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.