Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Seedling vigour index and productivity of greengram as influenced by pre-and post-emergence herbicicdes applied to maize

Shaik Nazreen; D. Subramanyam; N. Sunitha; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in greengram during rabi, 2016-17 at S.V. Agricultural college, Tirupati campus of Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh, India, to know the residual effect of pre-and post-emergence herbicides applied to preceding maize crop on succeeding greengram in a randomized block design with ten weed management practices. Sequential application of pre-emergence herbicides (alachlor 1000 g ha-1 and atrazine 1000 g ha-1) followed by post-emergence herbicides (Halosulfuron-methyl 67.5 g ha-1, Tembotrione 100 g ha-1 and 2,4-D Sodium salt 800 g ha-1) applied to maize did not show any residual / inhibitory effect on succeeding greengram. Among the different pre-and post-emergence herbicides applied to maize, pre-emergence application of alachlor 1000 g ha-1 fb post-emergence application of halosulfuron-methyl 67.5 g ha-1 + tembotrione 100 g ha-1 imposed to maize resulted in reduced dry weight of weeds associated with succeeding greengram at 15 DAS due to its extended weed control efficiency even in greengram.Root and shoot length including seedling vigour index and yield components and yield of succeding greengram recorded at their highest values with the above said weed management practice imposed to maize

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pre- and post-emergence herbicide application to maize had no residual or inhibitory effect on succeeding greengram

Treatment
pre-emergence herbicides (alachlor 1000 g ha-1 and atrazine 1000 g ha-1)e1
Outcome
residual / inhibitory effecte1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sequential application of pre-emergence herbicides (alachlor 1000 g ha-1 and atrazine 1000 g ha-1) followed by post-emergence herbicides (Halosulfuron-methyl 67.5 g ha-1, Tembotrione 100 g ha-1 and 2,4-D Sodium salt 800 g ha-1) applied to maize did not show any residual / inhibitory effect on succeeding greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence alachlor followed by post-emergence halosulfuron-methyl plus tembotrione applied to maize reduced the dry weight of weeds associated with succeeding greengram at 15 DAS

Treatment
pre-emergence application of alachlor 1000 g ha-1 fb post-emergence application of halosulfuron-methyl 67.5 g ha-1 + tembotrione 100 g ha-1e2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
due to its extended weed control efficiencye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“pre-emergence application of alachlor 1000 g ha-1 fb post-emergence application of halosulfuron-methyl 67.5 g ha-1 + tembotrione 100 g ha-1 imposed to maize resulted in reduced dry weight of weeds associated with succeeding greengram at 15 DAS due to its extended weed control efficiency even in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length, shoot length and seedling vigour index of succeeding greengram were highest under the weed management practice imposed to maize

Treatment
weed management practice imposed to maizee3
Outcome
Root and shoot length including seedling vigour indexe3
Direction
highest valuese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Root and shoot length including seedling vigour index and yield components and yield of succeding greengram recorded at their highest values with the above said weed management practice imposed to maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components and yield of succeeding greengram were highest under the weed management practice imposed to maize

Treatment
weed management practice imposed to maizee3
Outcome
yield components and yielde3
Direction
highest valuese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Root and shoot length including seedling vigour index and yield components and yield of succeding greengram recorded at their highest values with the above said weed management practice imposed to maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1264 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

alachlor · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

73 papers: 73 positive, 0 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.