Abstract
Background: Green gram is an important pulse crop known for its nutritive values as a rich source of protein and high culinary application in Indian dietary system. However, like any other crop, it faces the challenge of weed competition, which can significantly reduce its yield and quality. The objective of this study was to determine the best suitable weed management practices for green gram. Methods: Field experiment was conducted during summer season of 2021 at School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Medziphema Campus. There were seven weed management treatments and one treatment kept as control. All treatments were replicated thrice. Result: Hand weeding at 20 and 40DAS showed greater weed control and recorded higher values in growth and yield and showed at par values with other weed management practices pre-emergence application of pendimethalin fb hand weeding at 20 DAS, Pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg ha-1 (PE) fb Rice straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1, Imazethapyr @ 0.5 kg ha-1 (PoE) at 15 DAS fb Quizalofop p-ethyl @ 0.15 kg ha-1 (PoE) at 30 DAS and Pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg ha-1 (PE) fb Quizalofop p-ethyl @ 0.15 kg ha-1 (PoE) at 30 DAS. However, the use of only rice straw could not perform better. This indicates the advantages of integration of weed management practices. With hand weeding a laborious task concerning in large field condition, other integration of weed management will serve a viable option for profitable weed management in green gram.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave greater weed control in green gram.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Hand weeding at 20 and 40DASe0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- greatere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Response of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”
e0“Hand weeding at 20 and 40DAS showed greater weed control and recorded higher values in growth and yield and showed at par values with other weed management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave higher growth and yield in green gram.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Hand weeding at 20 and 40DASe0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”
e0“Hand weeding at 20 and 40DAS showed greater weed control and recorded higher values in growth and yield and showed at par values with other weed management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Other weed management practices gave growth and yield at par with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- other weed management practicese0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- Hand weeding at 20 and 40DASe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”
e0“Hand weeding at 20 and 40DAS showed greater weed control and recorded higher values in growth and yield and showed at par values with other weed management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Use of only rice straw as weed management did not perform better in green gram.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- use of only rice strawe1
- Outcome
- performe1
- Direction
- could not perform bettere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”
e1“However, the use of only rice straw could not perform better”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that integrating weed management practices is advantageous for green gram.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Outcome
- integration of weed management practicese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”
e2“This indicates the advantages of integration of weed management practices”
The same questions in other papers
cultivation system · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
72 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.