Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of plant geometry and weed management on yield and yield attributes of summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Randhir Kumar; Bharati Upadhaya; Prabhat Kumar; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2017 at research farm of TCA Dholi, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur (Bihar) to study the “Effect of plant geometry and weed management on yield and yield attributes of summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)” The experiment was laid out in randomised block design with three replications. The treatment comprised of three plant geometry i.e., 20 x 10 cm, 25 x 10 cm and 30 x 10 cm and five weed management practices i.e., weedy check, hand weeding at 15 and 30 DAS, Pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha (pre-emergence), Quizalofop-ethyl 60 g/ha at 15 DAS and Imazethapyr 60 g/ha at 15 DAS. Number of pods per plant, pod length and test weight were not significantly influenced by plant geometry. Among the weed management practices, hand weeding twice recorded significantly higher number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and pod length than Quizalofop-ethyl and Pendimethalin. Closer row spacing of 20 × 10 cm recorded significantly higher grain yields than row spacing of 25 × 10 cm and 30 × 10 cm. Hand weeding twice although produced higher grain yield but was at par with Imazethaypr and significantly surpassed over Quizalofop-ethyl and Pendimethalin. Harvest index was unaffected by plant geometry and weed management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant geometry did not significantly influence pods per plant, pod length, or test weight.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
plant geometrye0
Outcome
Number of pods per plant, pod length and test weighte0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of pods per plant, pod length and test weight were not significantly influenced by plant geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding increased pods per plant, grains per pod, and pod length relative to Quizalofop-ethyl and Pendimethalin.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
hand weeding twicee0
Outcome
number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and pod lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Quizalofop-ethyl and Pendimethaline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding twice recorded significantly higher number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and pod length than Quizalofop-ethyl and Pendimethalin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 20 × 10 cm gave significantly higher grain yield than 25 × 10 cm and 30 × 10 cm.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
20 × 10 cme0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
25 × 10 cm and 30 × 10 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Closer row spacing of 20 × 10 cm recorded significantly higher grain yields than row spacing of 25 × 10 cm and 30 × 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding gave grain yield statistically at par with Imazethaypr.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Hand weeding twicee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
Imazethaypre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding twice although produced higher grain yield but was at par with Imazethaypr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding significantly exceeded Quizalofop-ethyl and Pendimethalin for grain yield.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Hand weeding twicee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Quizalofop-ethyl and Pendimethaline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding twice although produced higher grain yield but was at par with Imazethaypr and significantly surpassed over Quizalofop-ethyl and Pendimethalin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant geometry and weed management did not affect harvest index.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
plant geometry and weed management practicese0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index was unaffected by plant geometry and weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–112 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.