Paper · 2013 · AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science

EFFECT OF ”KOMBA-KOMBA” PRUNING COMPOST AND PLANTING TIME OF MUNGBEAN IN INTERCROPPING WITH MAIZE ON YIELD AND SOIL FAUNA

Laode Sabaruddin; Laode Muhammad Harjoni Kilowasid; Hasbullah Syaf

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Soil fauna plays an important role in decomposition and nutrient mineralization. The objective of this research was to study the effect of "komba-komba" compost and planting time of mungbean intercropped with maize on yield and soil fauna. The research was conducted in research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo University. The experiment was laid out using split plot design with two factors ("komba-komba" compost and planting time of mungbean intercropped with maize). The result indicated that the highest net assimilation rate (NAR) of mungbean 5.78 g per cm 2 per week was obtained in the komba-komba compost 10 ton per ha with planting time of mungbean at 14 days after planting (DAP) maize whereas NAR of maize 5.50 g per cm 2 per week was obtained in the planting time of mungbean at 14 DAP maize. Coleoptera and Hymenoptera (Formicidae) were dominant and Shannon's diversity index ranged between 0.32 and 1.28. LER values tended to increase with the addition of "komba-komba" compost in soil and time variation of planting mungbean intercropped with maize. The relation between Shannon's diversity and LER values was variable. Keywords: soil fauna, compost, intercro-pping, planting time, assimilation, LER

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean had the highest net assimilation rate, 5.78 g per cm 2 per week, with komba-komba compost at 10 ton per ha and planting 14 DAP maize.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
komba-komba compost 10 ton per hae1
Outcome
net assimilation rate (NAR)e1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.78 g per cm 2 per weeke1
Setting
research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo Universitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the highest net assimilation rate (NAR) of mungbean 5.78 g per cm 2 per week was obtained in the komba-komba compost 10 ton per ha with planting time of mungbean at 14 days after planting (DAP) maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–780 · show in text ↑
e0

“The research was conducted in research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize net assimilation rate was 5.50 g per cm 2 per week in the mungbean planting time at 14 DAP maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
NAR of maizee2
Value
5.50 g per cm 2 per weeke2
Setting
research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo Universitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“whereas NAR of maize 5.50 g per cm 2 per week was obtained in the planting time of mungbean at 14 DAP maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–888 · show in text ↑
e0

“The research was conducted in research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coleoptera and Hymenoptera (Formicidae) were the dominant soil fauna groups.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
Coleoptera and Hymenoptera (Formicidae)e3
Setting
research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo Universitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLANTING TIME OF MUNGBEAN IN INTERCROPPING WITH MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“Coleoptera and Hymenoptera (Formicidae) were dominant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–943 · show in text ↑
e0

“The research was conducted in research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shannon's diversity index of the soil fauna ranged between 0.32 and 1.28.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
Shannon's diversity indexe4
Value
between 0.32 and 1.28e4
Setting
research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo Universitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLANTING TIME OF MUNGBEAN IN INTERCROPPING WITH MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“Shannon's diversity index ranged between 0.32 and 1.28”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1002 · show in text ↑
e0

“The research was conducted in research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LER values tended to increase with the addition of komba-komba compost and with the time variation of planting mungbean intercropped with maize.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae6
Treatment
time variation of planting mungbean intercropped with maizee6
Outcome
LER valuese5
Direction
tended to increasee5
Setting
research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo Universitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“LER values tended to increase with the addition of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1054 · show in text ↑
e6

“time variation of planting mungbean intercropped with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1148 · show in text ↑
e0

“The research was conducted in research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–405 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relation between Shannon's diversity and LER values was variable.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
relation between Shannon's diversity and LER valuese7
Setting
research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo Universitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLANTING TIME OF MUNGBEAN IN INTERCROPPING WITH MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–97 · show in text ↑
e7

“The relation between Shannon's diversity and LER values was variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1218 · show in text ↑
e0

“The research was conducted in research station of Agricultural Faculty, Haluoleo University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–405 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.