Paper · 2006 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) varieties to organic manures and their influence on fertility and enzyme activity of soil

P R Ramesh; Mohan Singh; N. R. Panwar; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2003 and 2004 to study the effect of 6 nutrient sources (chenmcal fertilizers@30 kgN+26.2 kg Plha, 3 tonnes/ ha vennicompost, 3 tonnes/ha phosphocompost, 2 tonnes/ ha poultry manure, 4 tonnes/ha cattle dung manure and control) on the growth, yield and protein content of 4 pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp] varieties ('ICPL 87119', 'Jowahar 4', 'BDN 2' and 'Aasha') and their influence on fertility and enzyme activity of soil. Among the varieties 'ICPL 87119' recorded higher plant height, branches/plant, biomass accumulation, pods/plant, IOO-seed weight and higher seed and straw yield whereas, 'BDN 2' recorded the lowest growth and yield but higher protein content. Application of cattle dung manure and chemical fertilizers recorded similar growth, yield attributes, protein' content and seed yield whereas application of vermicompost and phosphoeompost resulted in identical growth, yield attributes and yield. Poultry manure application recorded the 'lowest crop growth and yield. Application of cattle dung manure resulted in higher soil organic carbon, available Nand K and increased the dehydrogenase and phosphatase activity of soil compared to chemical fertilizers and control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICPL 87119 had higher growth and yield traits.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICPL 87119e0
Outcome
plant height, branches/plant, biomass accumulatione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'ICPL 87119' recorded higher plant height, branches/plant, biomass accumulation, pods/plant, IOO-seed weight and higher seed and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICPL 87119 had higher pods, seed weight, seed and straw yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICPL 87119e0
Outcome
pods/plant, IOO-seed weight and higher seed and straw yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'ICPL 87119' recorded higher plant height, branches/plant, biomass accumulation, pods/plant, IOO-seed weight and higher seed and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BDN 2 had the lowest growth and yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
BDN 2e0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'BDN 2' recorded the lowest growth and yield but higher protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BDN 2 had higher protein content.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
BDN 2e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'BDN 2' recorded the lowest growth and yield but higher protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle dung manure and chemical fertilizers produced similar growth, yield attributes, protein content and seed yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
cattle dung manuree0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes, protein' content and seed yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cattle dung manure and chemical fertilizers recorded similar growth, yield attributes, protein' content and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost and phosphocompost gave identical growth and yield outcomes.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
identicale0
Comparator
phosphoeomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of vermicompost and phosphoeompost resulted in identical growth, yield attributes and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure produced the lowest crop growth and yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Poultry manure applicatione0
Outcome
crop growth and yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poultry manure application recorded the 'lowest crop growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle dung manure increased soil organic carbon and available nitrogen and potassium versus fertilizers and control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
cattle dung manuree0
Outcome
soil organic carbon, available Nand Ke0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
chemical fertilizers and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cattle dung manure resulted in higher soil organic carbon, available Nand K and increased the dehydrogenase and phosphatase activity of soil compared to chemical fertilizers and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle dung manure increased soil dehydrogenase and phosphatase activity versus fertilizers and control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
cattle dung manuree0
Outcome
dehydrogenase and phosphatase activity of soile0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
chemical fertilizers and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cattle dung manure resulted in higher soil organic carbon, available Nand K and increased the dehydrogenase and phosphatase activity of soil compared to chemical fertilizers and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 159 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.