Paper · 1983 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Comparison of N2 Fixation and Yields in Cajanus cajan between Hydrogenase-Positive and Hydrogenase-Negative Rhizobia by In Situ Acetylene Reduction Assays and Direct 15N Partitioning

Jeffrey S. La Favre; Dennis D. Focht

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
33
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pigeon peas [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] were grown in soil columns containing (15)N-enriched organic matter. Seasonal N(2) fixation activity was determined by periodically assaying plants for reduction of C(2)H(2). N(2) fixation rose sharply from the first assay period at 51 days after planting to a peak of activity between floral initiation and fruit set. N(2) fixation (acetylene reduction) activity dropped concomitantly with pod maturation but recovered after pod harvests. Analysis of (15)N content of plant shoots revealed that approximately 91 to 94% of plant N was derived from N(2) fixation. The effect of inoculation with hydrogenase-positive and hydrogenase-negative rhizobia was examined. Pigeon peas inoculated with strain P132 (hydrogenase-positive) yielded significantly more total shoot N than other inoculated or uninoculated treatments. However, two other hydrogenase-positive strains did not yield significantly more total shoot N than a hydrogenase-negative strain. The extent of nodulation by inoculum strains compared to indigenous rhizobia was determined by typing nodules according to intrinsic antibiotic resistance of the inoculum strains. The inoculum strains were detected in almost all typed nodules of inoculated plants.Gas samples were taken from soil columns several times during the growth cycle of the plants. H(2) was never detected, even in columns containing pigeon peas inoculated with hydrogenase-negative rhizobia. This was attributed to H(2) consumption by soil bacteria. Estimation of N(2) fixation by acetylene reduction activity was closest to the direct (15)N method when ethylene concentrations in the gas headspace (between the column lid and soil surface) were extrapolated to include the soil pore space as opposed solely to measurement in the headspace. There was an 8-fold difference between the two acetylene reduction assay methods of estimation. Based on a planting density of 15,000 plants per hectare, the direct (15)N fixation rates ranged from 67 (noninoculated) to 134 kilograms per hectare, while grain yields ranged from 540 to 825 kilograms per hectare. Grain yields were not increased with N fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 fixation rose sharply from the first assay at 51 days after planting to a peak of activity between floral initiation and fruit set in pigeon pea.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
N(2) fixatione1
Direction
rose sharplye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“N(2) fixation rose sharply from the first assay period at 51 days after planting to a peak of activity between floral initiation and fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 fixation (acetylene reduction) activity dropped concomitantly with pod maturation.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
N(2) fixation (acetylene reduction) activitye1
Direction
droppede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“N(2) fixation (acetylene reduction) activity dropped concomitantly with pod maturation but recovered after pod harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 fixation (acetylene reduction) activity recovered after pod harvests.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
N(2) fixation (acetylene reduction) activitye1
Direction
recoverede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“N(2) fixation (acetylene reduction) activity dropped concomitantly with pod maturation but recovered after pod harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Approximately 91 to 94% of plant N was derived from N2 fixation, from the (15)N content of shoots.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
plant shootse1
Outcome
plant N was derived from N(2) fixatione1
Value
91 to 94%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Analysis of (15)N content of plant shoots revealed that approximately 91 to 94% of plant N was derived from N(2) fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon peas inoculated with the hydrogenase-positive strain P132 yielded significantly more total shoot N than other inoculated or uninoculated treatments.

Taxon
Pigeon peasCajanus cajane1
Treatment
inoculated with strain P132 (hydrogenase-positive)e1
Interactor
strain P132e1symbiont
Outcome
total shoot Ne1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
other inoculated or uninoculated treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pigeon peas inoculated with strain P132 (hydrogenase-positive) yielded significantly more total shoot N than other inoculated or uninoculated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two other hydrogenase-positive strains did not yield significantly more total shoot N than a hydrogenase-negative strain.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
two other hydrogenase-positive strainse1
Interactor
hydrogenase-positive strainse1symbiont
Outcome
total shoot Ne1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
a hydrogenase-negative straine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“two other hydrogenase-positive strains did not yield significantly more total shoot N than a hydrogenase-negative strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculum strains were detected in almost all typed nodules of inoculated plants.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
nodulese1
Interactor
inoculum strainse1symbiont
Outcome
inoculum strains were detected in almost all typed nodulese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“The inoculum strains were detected in almost all typed nodules of inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1252 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2 was never detected in soil column gas samples, even in columns with pigeon peas inoculated with hydrogenase-negative rhizobia.

Taxon
pigeon peasCajanus cajane1
Interactor
hydrogenase-negative rhizobiae1symbiont
Outcome
H(2) was never detectede1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“H(2) was never detected, even in columns containing pigeon peas inoculated with hydrogenase-negative rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1456 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the absence of H2 to H2 consumption by soil bacteria.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Interactor
soil bacteriae1other
Outcome
H(2) consumptione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“This was attributed to H(2) consumption by soil bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1514 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimation of N2 fixation by acetylene reduction was closest to the direct (15)N method when ethylene concentrations were extrapolated to include the soil pore space rather than only the headspace.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
Estimation of N(2) fixation by acetylene reduction activitye1
Direction
closeste1
Comparator
direct (15)N methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Estimation of N(2) fixation by acetylene reduction activity was closest to the direct (15)N method when ethylene concentrations in the gas headspace (between the column lid and soil surface) were extrapolated to include the soil pore space as opposed solely to measurement in the headspace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1805 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was an 8-fold difference between the two acetylene reduction assay methods of estimation.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
difference between the two acetylene reduction assay methods of estimatione1
Value
8-folde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was an 8-fold difference between the two acetylene reduction assay methods of estimation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1901 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct (15)N fixation rates ranged from 67 kg per hectare (noninoculated) to 134 kg per hectare.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
direct (15)N fixation ratese1
Value
67 (noninoculated) to 134 kilograms per hectaree1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“the direct (15)N fixation rates ranged from 67 (noninoculated) to 134 kilograms per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields ranged from 540 to 825 kilograms per hectare.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Value
540 to 825 kilograms per hectaree1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yields ranged from 540 to 825 kilograms per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2060–2117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields were not increased with N fertilizer.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
N fertilizere1
Outcome
Grain yieldse1
Direction
not increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yields were not increased with N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2168 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 159 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.