Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Management of late blight of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) through chemical under field conditions Allahabad Uttar Pradesh, India

Praveen Kumar; H. B Singh; Abhilasha A. Lal; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted for the Management of late blight of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) by selected systemic and contact fungicides in the research field of Department of Plant Pathology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad during Rabi Season of 2013-2014. Seven treatments including control with three replications were taken up using RBD. Treatments comparing of foliar spray of Indofil M-45 (mancozeb 75%), Companion (carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63%), Ridomil MZ-72 (metalaxyl 8% + mancozeb 64%), Moximate (cymoxanil 8%+ mancozeb 64%), Avtar (hexaconazole 4% + zineb 68%), Lurit (dimethomorph 50%), and control (spray of plane water) were applied at the onset of disease symptoms at 60 DAS. Observations for percent disease intensity were recorded at 10 and 20 days after spray. Minimum Percent disease intensity was recorded in (cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64%) at 10 days and 20 days after the spray (10.67% and 13.67%, respectively), followed by dimethomorph 50% (11.67% and 16.00%), as compared to control which recorded maximum percent disease intensity (41.00% and 62.00%, respectively). Maximum yield (q/ha) was recorded in cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64% (135.67), followed by dimethomorph 50% (128.33), as compared to control T0 - (67.00, respectively). The highest cost benefit ratio was recorded in T4– cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64% (1:1.91), followed by T6 - dimethomorph 50% (1:1.80), as compared to control T0- (1:0.99, respectively).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cymoxanil plus mancozeb had minimum disease intensity at 10 days, 10.67%.

Treatment
cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64%e0e1
Outcome
Percent disease intensitye0e1
Direction
Minimume0e1
Value
10.67%e0e1
Qualifier
10 dayse0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum Percent disease intensity was recorded in (cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64%) at 10 days and 20 days after the spray (10.67% and 13.67%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cymoxanil plus mancozeb had minimum disease intensity at 20 days, 13.67%.

Treatment
cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64%e0e1
Outcome
Percent disease intensitye0e1
Direction
Minimume0e1
Value
13.67%e0e1
Qualifier
20 dayse0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum Percent disease intensity was recorded in (cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64%) at 10 days and 20 days after the spray (10.67% and 13.67%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph had 11.67% disease intensity at 10 days.

Treatment
dimethomorph 50%e0e1
Value
11.67%e0e1

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by dimethomorph 50% (11.67% and 16.00%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph had 16.00% disease intensity at 20 days.

Treatment
dimethomorph 50%e0e1
Value
16.00%e0e1

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by dimethomorph 50% (11.67% and 16.00%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cymoxanil plus mancozeb had maximum yield of 135.67 q/ha.

Treatment
cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64%e0e1
Outcome
yield (q/ha)e0e1
Direction
Maximume0e1
Value
135.67e0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yield (q/ha) was recorded in cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64% (135.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1214 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph yielded 128.33 q/ha.

Treatment
dimethomorph 50%e0e1e2
Outcome
yield (q/ha)e0e1e2
Value
128.33e0e1e2
Comparator
control T0e0e1e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by dimethomorph 50% (128.33), as compared to control T0 - (67.00, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1304 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield (q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cymoxanil plus mancozeb had the highest cost benefit ratio, 1:1.91.

Treatment
cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64%e0e1
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0e1
Direction
higheste0e1
Value
1:1.91e0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cost benefit ratio was recorded in T4– cymoxanil 8% + mancozeb 64% (1:1.91)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1393 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph had a cost benefit ratio of 1:1.80.

Treatment
dimethomorph 50%e0e1e2
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0e1e2
Value
1:1.80e0e1e2
Comparator
control T0e0e1e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by T6 - dimethomorph 50% (1:1.80), as compared to control T0- (1:0.99, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1488 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“cost benefit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1336 · show in text ↑

cymoxanil · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mancozeb · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

cymoxanil · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

dimethomorph · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mancozeb · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.