Paper · 1970 · Plant Pathology

The Effect of Potato Haulm Treatment on the Incidence of Potato Gangrene in Storage

C. Logan

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The incidence of potato gangrene in the progeny from diseased parent tubers after damage and storage at 4–6dGC was found to depend, to a large extent, on the haulm treatment carried out four weeks prior to harvest. There was a marked reduction in gangrene incidence in tubers from plots where the haulm was pulled out and removed instead of cut and removed or burnt off. This reduction is considered to result from a lowering of the level of fungal inoculum on the tuber surface rather than through a difference in tuber maturity. The incidence of gangrene was not reduced by mancozeb (Dithane 945) foliar sprays during the growing season nor was there any difference between the chemicals (sodium chlorate and sulphuric acid) used to burn off the haulms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haulm treatment affected gangrene incidence after damage and storage.

Treatment
haulm treatmente0
Outcome
incidence of potato gangrenee0
Qualifier
after damage and storage at 4–6dGCe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incidence of potato gangrene in the progeny from diseased parent tubers after damage and storage at 4–6dGC was found to depend, to a large extent, on the haulm treatment carried out four weeks prior to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulling and removing haulms reduced tuber gangrene incidence compared with cutting or burning.

Treatment
haulm was pulled out and removede0
Outcome
gangrene incidence in tuberse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
cut and removed or burnt offe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marked reduction in gangrene incidence in tubers from plots where the haulm was pulled out and removed instead of cut and removed or burnt off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Haulm Treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction was attributed to lower fungal inoculum on tubers.

Outcome
reductione0
Qualifier
lowering of the level of fungal inoculum on the tuber surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This reduction is considered to result from a lowering of the level of fungal inoculum on the tuber surface rather than through a difference in tuber maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Haulm Treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb foliar sprays did not reduce gangrene incidence.

Treatment
mancozeb (Dithane 945) foliar sprayse0
Outcome
incidence of gangrenee0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incidence of gangrene was not reduced by mancozeb (Dithane 945) foliar sprays during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Haulm Treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haulm burn-off chemicals did not differ in gangrene incidence.

Treatment
sodium chloratee0
Outcome
any differencee0
Direction
nor was there any differencee0
Comparator
sulphuric acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor was there any difference between the chemicals (sodium chlorate and sulphuric acid) used to burn off the haulms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Haulm Treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–36 · show in text ↑

mancozeb · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 67 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.