Paper · 2020 · Plant Production Science

Foliar zinc application improved grain zinc accumulation and bioavailable zinc in unpolished and polished rice

Kankunlanach Khampuang; Sithisavet Lordkaew; Bernard Dell; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study examined the effect of foliar zinc (Zn) application on grain yield, Zn and phytate concentrations and its impact on the phytate:Zn molar ratio, an indicator for Zn bioavailability in human digestive tracts, in unpolished and polished rice between two rice cultivars across two cropping years. The modern improved rice cultivar CNT1 and the traditional improved cultivar KDK were foliar applied with five rates of ZnSO4 in two cropping years. In 2016, 0.3% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration of unpolished rice in KDK by 21% over the nil Zn, while the effect was not found in CNT1. In polished rice, 0.2–0.4% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration by 11.2–20.0% in CNT1 and by 8.3–24.1% in KDK, and decreased the phytate concentration by 5.2–16.9% in KDK but not in CNT1. In 2017, 0.4% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration by 18.2–26.2% and 32.4–42.6% in unpolished and polished rice, respectively, in both cultivars. Application of 0.4% ZnSO4 decreased the phytate:Zn molar ratio in polished rice from 29.7 to 18.3 and from 26.4 to 17.9 in CNT1 and KDK, respectively in 2016, and from 15.7 to 12.6 in KDK in 2017. Foliar Zn application decreased the phytate:Zn molar ratio in unpolished rice from 27.9 to 22.7 and from 21.9 to 17.2 in CNT1 and KDK, respectively in 2017, but had no effect in 2016. Thus, foliar Zn application can improve grain Zn concentration and decrease the phytate:Zn molar ratio in both unpolished and polished rice but the response can vary with cropping year and cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2016, 0.3% ZnSO4 increased unpolished grain Zn in KDK by 21% over nil Zn.

Material
KDKe0
Treatment
0.3% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn concentration of unpolished ricee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
nil Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2016, 0.3% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration of unpolished rice in KDK by 21% over the nil Zn, while the effect was not found in CNT1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same effect was not found in CNT1 in 2016.

Material
CNT1e0
Treatment
0.3% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn concentration of unpolished ricee0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
nil Zne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2016, 0.3% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration of unpolished rice in KDK by 21% over the nil Zn, while the effect was not found in CNT1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 increased polished rice Zn in CNT1 by 11.2–20.0%.

Material
CNT1e0
Treatment
0.2–0.4% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.2–20.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In polished rice, 0.2–0.4% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration by 11.2–20.0% in CNT1 and by 8.3–24.1% in KDK, and decreased the phytate concentration by 5.2–16.9% in KDK but not in CNT1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 increased polished rice Zn in KDK by 8.3–24.1%.

Material
KDKe0
Treatment
0.2–0.4% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.3–24.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In polished rice, 0.2–0.4% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration by 11.2–20.0% in CNT1 and by 8.3–24.1% in KDK, and decreased the phytate concentration by 5.2–16.9% in KDK but not in CNT1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 reduced polished rice phytate in KDK by 5.2–16.9%.

Material
KDKe0
Treatment
0.2–0.4% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
phytate concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.2–16.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In polished rice, 0.2–0.4% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration by 11.2–20.0% in CNT1 and by 8.3–24.1% in KDK, and decreased the phytate concentration by 5.2–16.9% in KDK but not in CNT1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 did not reduce polished rice phytate in CNT1.

Material
CNT1e0
Treatment
0.2–0.4% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
phytate concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In polished rice, 0.2–0.4% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration by 11.2–20.0% in CNT1 and by 8.3–24.1% in KDK, and decreased the phytate concentration by 5.2–16.9% in KDK but not in CNT1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2017, 0.4% ZnSO4 increased unpolished rice Zn by 18.2–26.2% in both cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse0
Treatment
0.4% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.2–26.2%e0
Qualifier
2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2017, 0.4% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration by 18.2–26.2% and 32.4–42.6% in unpolished and polished rice, respectively, in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2017, 0.4% ZnSO4 increased polished rice Zn by 32.4–42.6% in both cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse0
Treatment
0.4% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32.4–42.6%e0
Qualifier
2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2017, 0.4% ZnSO4 increased the Zn concentration by 18.2–26.2% and 32.4–42.6% in unpolished and polished rice, respectively, in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 decreased polished rice phytate:Zn ratio in CNT1 from 29.7 to 18.3 in 2016.

Material
CNT1e0
Treatment
0.4% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
phytate:Zn molar ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
29.7 to 18.3e0
Qualifier
2016e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 0.4% ZnSO4 decreased the phytate:Zn molar ratio in polished rice from 29.7 to 18.3 and from 26.4 to 17.9 in CNT1 and KDK, respectively in 2016, and from 15.7 to 12.6 in KDK in 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 decreased polished rice phytate:Zn ratio in KDK from 26.4 to 17.9 in 2016.

Material
KDKe0
Treatment
0.4% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
phytate:Zn molar ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
26.4 to 17.9e0
Qualifier
2016e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 0.4% ZnSO4 decreased the phytate:Zn molar ratio in polished rice from 29.7 to 18.3 and from 26.4 to 17.9 in CNT1 and KDK, respectively in 2016, and from 15.7 to 12.6 in KDK in 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 decreased polished rice phytate:Zn ratio in KDK from 15.7 to 12.6 in 2017.

Material
KDKe0
Treatment
0.4% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
phytate:Zn molar ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15.7 to 12.6e0
Qualifier
2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 0.4% ZnSO4 decreased the phytate:Zn molar ratio in polished rice from 29.7 to 18.3 and from 26.4 to 17.9 in CNT1 and KDK, respectively in 2016, and from 15.7 to 12.6 in KDK in 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn decreased unpolished rice phytate:Zn ratio in CNT1 from 27.9 to 22.7 in 2017.

Material
CNT1e0
Treatment
Foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
phytate:Zn molar ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
27.9 to 22.7e0
Qualifier
2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar Zn application decreased the phytate:Zn molar ratio in unpolished rice from 27.9 to 22.7 and from 21.9 to 17.2 in CNT1 and KDK, respectively in 2017, but had no effect in 2016.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn decreased unpolished rice phytate:Zn ratio in KDK from 21.9 to 17.2 in 2017.

Material
KDKe0
Treatment
Foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
phytate:Zn molar ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
21.9 to 17.2e0
Qualifier
2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar Zn application decreased the phytate:Zn molar ratio in unpolished rice from 27.9 to 22.7 and from 21.9 to 17.2 in CNT1 and KDK, respectively in 2017, but had no effect in 2016.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn had no effect on unpolished rice phytate:Zn ratio in 2016.

Material
CNT1 and KDKe0
Treatment
Foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
phytate:Zn molar ratioe0
Qualifier
2016e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar Zn application decreased the phytate:Zn molar ratio in unpolished rice from 27.9 to 22.7 and from 21.9 to 17.2 in CNT1 and KDK, respectively in 2017, but had no effect in 2016.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 60 positive, 5 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 72 positive, 3 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.