Paper · 2020 · HortScience

Soil Nitrogen Fertilization Increases Yeast Assimilable Nitrogen Concentrations in ‘Golden Russet’ and ‘Medaille d’Or’ Apples Used for Cider Production

Adam D. Karl; Michael G. Brown; Sihui Ma; et al.

18
claims
38
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The recent growth in the U.S. hard-cider industry has increased the demand for cider apples ( Malus × domestica Borkh.), but little is known about how to manage orchard soil fertility best to optimize horticultural performance and juice characteristics for these cultivars. To assess whether nitrogen fertilizer applied to the soil can improve apple juice and cider quality, calcium nitrate (CaNO 3 ) fertilizer was applied at different rates to the soil beneath ‘Golden Russet’ and ‘Medaille d’Or’ trees over the course of three growing seasons. The experiment started when the trees were in their second leaf. The trees were cropped in their third and fourth leaf. At the end of the first growing season of the experiment, the greatest fertilizer rate increased tree trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) by 82% relative to the control, but this difference did not persist through to the end of the study. Yield and crop load were unaffected by the nitrogen fertilization treatments. Increasing the nitrogen fertilizer rate correlated positively with more advanced harvest maturity in ‘Golden Russet’ fruit, which resulted in greater soluble solid concentration (SSC). Fruit from the greatest fertilizer rate treatment had an average starch pattern index (SPI) that was 1 U greater than in the control, and an SSC that was 3% greater than the control. The fertilizer treatments did not affect juice pH, titratable acidity (TA), or total polyphenol concentrations. Yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) concentrations were increased by nitrogen fertilization for both cultivars in both harvest years. The greatest fertilizer treatment increased juice primary amino nitrogen by 103% relative to the control. Greater nitrogen fertilization rates correlated positively with less hydrogen sulfide production during the fermentation of ‘Golden Russet’ juice from the first, but not the second, harvest. During the first year, cumulative hydrogen sulfide production for the ‘Golden Russet’ control treatment was 29.6 μg·L –1 compared with the ‘Golden Russet’ high treatment, which cumulatively produced 0.1 μg·L –1 . Greater maximum fermentation rates and shorter fermentation durations correlated positively with increased fertilization rate for both cultivars after the second harvest. High treatment fermentations had maximum fermentation rates 110% greater, and fermentation durations 30% shorter than the control. Other horticultural and juice-quality parameters were not affected negatively by the CaNO 3 treatments. In orchards producing apples specifically for the hard-cider industry, nitrogen fertilizer could increase juice YAN, thus reducing the need for exogenous additions during cider production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest fertilizer rate increased tree trunk cross-sectional area by 82% in the first season.

Treatment
greatest fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
tree trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
82%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the greatest fertilizer rate increased tree trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) by 82% relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trunk area difference did not persist to study end.

Outcome
differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this difference did not persist through to the end of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization did not affect yield and crop load.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
Yield and crop loade0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and crop load were unaffected by the nitrogen fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilizer rate correlated with more advanced Golden Russet harvest maturity.

Material
‘Golden Russet’e0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
harvest maturitye0
Direction
more advancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the nitrogen fertilizer rate correlated positively with more advanced harvest maturity in ‘Golden Russet’ fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More advanced maturity yielded greater soluble solids.

Organ / stage
fruite1
Outcome
soluble solid concentration (SSC)e0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which resulted in greater soluble solid concentration (SSC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the nitrogen fertilizer rate correlated positively with more advanced harvest maturity in ‘Golden Russet’ fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest fertilizer rate raised fruit starch pattern index by 1 U.

Treatment
greatest fertilizer rate treatmente0
Outcome
starch pattern index (SPI)e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1 Ue0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit from the greatest fertilizer rate treatment had an average starch pattern index (SPI) that was 1 U greater than in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest fertilizer rate raised soluble solids by 3%.

Treatment
greatest fertilizer ratee1
Outcome
SSCe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
3%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an SSC that was 3% greater than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
e1

“the greatest fertilizer rate increased tree trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) by 82% relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer did not affect juice pH, acidity or polyphenols.

Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
juice pH, titratable acidity (TA), or total polyphenol concentrationse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizer treatments did not affect juice pH, titratable acidity (TA), or total polyphenol concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased yeast assimilable nitrogen in both cultivars in both harvests.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
Yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) concentrations were increased by nitrogen fertilization for both cultivars in both harvest years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest fertilizer rate increased juice primary amino nitrogen by 103%.

Treatment
greatest fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
juice primary amino nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
103%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest fertilizer treatment increased juice primary amino nitrogen by 103% relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization correlated with less hydrogen sulfide production in first-harvest Golden Russet fermentation.

Material
‘Golden Russet’e0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilization ratese0
Outcome
hydrogen sulfide productione0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater nitrogen fertilization rates correlated positively with less hydrogen sulfide production during the fermentation of ‘Golden Russet’ juice from the first, but not the second, harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1888 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Golden Russet control and high treatment produced 29.6 and 0.1 μg·L –1 hydrogen sulfide in year one.

Treatment
‘Golden Russet’ high treatmente0
Outcome
cumulative hydrogen sulfide productione0
Value
0.1 μg·L –1e0
Comparator
‘Golden Russet’ control treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cumulative hydrogen sulfide production for the ‘Golden Russet’ control treatment was 29.6 μg·L –1 compared with the ‘Golden Russet’ high treatment, which cumulatively produced 0.1 μg·L –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–2100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization correlated with greater maximum fermentation rate after the second harvest.

Treatment
increased fertilization ratee0
Outcome
maximum fermentation ratese0
Direction
Greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater maximum fermentation rates and shorter fermentation durations correlated positively with increased fertilization rate for both cultivars after the second harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization correlated with shorter fermentation duration after the second harvest.

Treatment
increased fertilization ratee0
Outcome
fermentation durationse0
Direction
shortere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater maximum fermentation rates and shorter fermentation durations correlated positively with increased fertilization rate for both cultivars after the second harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High treatment fermentation rate was 110% greater than control.

Treatment
High treatmente0
Outcome
maximum fermentation ratese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
110%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High treatment fermentations had maximum fermentation rates 110% greater, and fermentation durations 30% shorter than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2274–2403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High treatment fermentation duration was 30% shorter than control.

Treatment
High treatmente0
Outcome
fermentation durationse0
Direction
shortere0
Value
30%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High treatment fermentations had maximum fermentation rates 110% greater, and fermentation durations 30% shorter than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2274–2403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other horticultural and juice quality parameters were not adversely affected.

Treatment
CaNO 3 treatmentse0
Outcome
horticultural and juice-quality parameterse0
Direction
not affected negativelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other horticultural and juice-quality parameters were not affected negatively by the CaNO 3 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2405–2507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest orchard nitrogen fertilizer could raise YAN and reduce exogenous additions.

Outcome
increase juice YANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilizer could increase juice YAN, thus reducing the need for exogenous additions during cider production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2580–2696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Used for Cider Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 23 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 31 positive, 18 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 150 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.