Paper · 2015 · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH

Effect of previous season application of Sisymbrium irio and Trichoderma harzianum on growth of black gram in Macrophomina phaseolina inoculated soil.

Arshad Javaid; Amna Shoaib; Saba Khurshid

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Macrophomina phaseolina is the cause of charcoal rot in green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. A pot experiment was carried out in March 2013 to study the effect of soil amendment with a biological control agent Trichoderma harzianum and dry biomass of a brassicaceous weed Sisymbrium irio on charcoal rot disease of green gram. The present experiment was a continuation of that study and carried out in the same pots in September 2013 to study the effect of the soil amendments on crop growth of black gram. In general, number of leaves, and various root and shoot growth parameters were significantly decreased due to M. phaseolina inoculation. Application of 1, 2 and 3% dry biomass of S. irio or T. harzianum separately failed to alleviate biotic stress of M. phaseolina. However, combined application of 1% dry biomass of S. irio and T. harzianum significantly increased number of leaves by 23% over positive control inoculated only with M. phaseolina. Various parameters of root and shoot growth were also higher in this treatment as compared to other soil amendment treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen inoculation significantly decreased black gram leaf number and root and shoot growth parameters.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
M. phaseolina inoculatione0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
number of leaves, and various root and shoot growth parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, number of leaves, and various root and shoot growth parameters were significantly decreased due to M. phaseolina inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Separate S. irio dry biomass applications failed to alleviate pathogen stress in black gram.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
1, 2 and 3% dry biomass of S. irioe0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
biotic stress of M. phaseolinae0
Direction
failed to alleviatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 1, 2 and 3% dry biomass of S. irio or T. harzianum separately failed to alleviate biotic stress of M. phaseolina.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Separate T. harzianum application failed to alleviate pathogen stress in black gram.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
T. harzianume0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biotic stress of M. phaseolinae0
Direction
failed to alleviatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 1, 2 and 3% dry biomass of S. irio or T. harzianum separately failed to alleviate biotic stress of M. phaseolina.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 1% S. irio biomass and T. harzianum increased black gram leaf number by 23% over the pathogen-only control.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
combined application of 1% dry biomass of S. irio and T. harzianume0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
positive control inoculated only with M. phaseolinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of 1% dry biomass of S. irio and T. harzianum significantly increased number of leaves by 23% over positive control inoculated only with M. phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave higher black gram root and shoot growth parameters than other amendments.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
combined application of 1% dry biomass of S. irio and T. harzianume1
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parameters of root and shoot growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other soil amendment treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Various parameters of root and shoot growth were also higher in this treatment as compared to other soil amendment treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1127 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of 1% dry biomass of S. irio and T. harzianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–106 · show in text ↑

Macrophomina phaseolina · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 39 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.