Paper · 2020 · Chilean journal of agricultural research

Additive intercropping of sunflower and soybean to improve yield and land use efficiency: Effect of thinning interval and nitrogen fertilization

Ali I. Nawar; Heba S.A. Salama; Hassan E. Khalil

15
claims
23
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

An additive intercropping model was adopted to improve land use efficiency and productivity of two prominent oil crops grown in Egypt, that is, sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) A 2-yr field trial was conducted in Northern Egypt during the summers of 2017 and 2018. The effects on yield, crop components, and land use efficiency of the system were tested with three N fertilizer rates (70, 105, and 140 kg N ha -1 ) and three thinning intervals of 15, 30, and 45 d after sowing (DAS) for sunflower and 30, 45, and 65 DAS for soybean. Late thinning increased plant height in both crops, but reduced sunflower stem and head diameters and seed weight per head. The maximum seed yield occurred in the pure stands and reached 4.00 and 1.61 t ha -1 for sunflower and soybean, respectively. Early thinning positively affected seed yield and fresh and dry biological yields, while the effect of N rates was limited. Seed oil content of both crops was slightly affected by the treatments and generally averaged approximately 50% and 20% in sunflower and soybean, respectively. While the land equivalent ratio (LER) indicated the advantage of intercropping sunflower and soybean (LER > 1), the DM equivalent ratio (DMER) provided a more realistic estimate as to the effect of intercropping compared with sole cropping in an additive model. Early and intermediate thinning intervals across all N fertilizer rates resulted in yield gain (DMER > 1), while late thinning reduced yield (DMER < 1). Intercropping sunflower and soybean crops is recommended for low input farming systems, particularly in developing countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late thinning increased sunflower plant height.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
Late thinninge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late thinning increased plant height in both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–620 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late thinning increased soybean plant height.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Late thinninge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late thinning increased plant height in both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–620 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late thinning reduced sunflower stem diameter, head diameter and seed weight per head.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Late thinninge0
Outcome
stem and head diameters and seed weight per heade0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late thinning increased plant height in both crops, but reduced sunflower stem and head diameters and seed weight per head”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–692 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower seed yield was maximal in pure stands at 4.00 t ha -1.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.00e0
Setting
pure standse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed yield occurred in the pure stands and reached 4.00 and 1.61 t ha -1 for sunflower and soybean, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–818 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean seed yield was maximal in pure stands at 1.61 t ha -1.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.61 t ha -1e0
Setting
pure standse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed yield occurred in the pure stands and reached 4.00 and 1.61 t ha -1 for sunflower and soybean, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early thinning positively affected seed yield and fresh and dry biological yields.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
Early thinninge0
Outcome
seed yield and fresh and dry biological yieldse0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early thinning positively affected seed yield and fresh and dry biological yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early thinning positively affected soybean seed yield and fresh and dry biological yields.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Early thinninge0
Outcome
seed yield and fresh and dry biological yieldse0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early thinning positively affected seed yield and fresh and dry biological yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates had a limited effect on the studied crop outcomes.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
effect of N ratese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of N rates was limited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–942 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower seed oil content was slightly affected by treatments and averaged about 50%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Seed oil contente0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
slightly affectede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed oil content of both crops was slightly affected by the treatments and generally averaged approximately 50% and 20% in sunflower and soybean, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean seed oil content was slightly affected by treatments and averaged about 20%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Seed oil contente0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
slightly affectede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed oil content of both crops was slightly affected by the treatments and generally averaged approximately 50% and 20% in sunflower and soybean, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratio above one indicated an intercropping advantage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
land equivalent ratio (LER)e0
Value
LER > 1e0
Qualifier
intercropping sunflower and soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the land equivalent ratio (LER) indicated the advantage of intercropping sunflower and soybean (LER > 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1214 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DM equivalent ratio gave a more realistic estimate of additive intercropping effects than sole cropping.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Outcome
more realistic estimatee0
Qualifier
additive modele0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the DM equivalent ratio (DMER) provided a more realistic estimate as to the effect of intercropping compared with sole cropping in an additive model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1364 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early and intermediate thinning across nitrogen rates produced yield gains, with DMER above one.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
Early and intermediate thinning intervalse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
gaine0
Value
DMER > 1e0
Qualifier
across all N fertilizer ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early and intermediate thinning intervals across all N fertilizer rates resulted in yield gain (DMER > 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1471 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late thinning reduced yield, with DMER below one.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
late thinninge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
DMER < 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late thinning reduced yield (DMER < 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1517 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–213 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend intercropping sunflower and soybean for low-input farming systems, particularly in developing countries.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
Intercropping sunflower and soybean cropse0
Qualifier
low input farming systemse0
Setting
developing countriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping sunflower and soybean crops is recommended for low input farming systems, particularly in developing countries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1643 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
    Sunflower yield loss increased as defoliation increased.

    Defoliation Effects on Sunflower Yield Reduction · 2001 · compared with increasing level of defoliation

    Opposite direction

  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

pruning · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

44 papers: 12 positive, 32 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

pruning · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pruning · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 33 positive, 77 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.