Paper · 2001 · Agronomy Journal

Defoliation Effects on Sunflower Yield Reduction

Julio Muro; Ignacio Irigoyen; Ana F. Militino; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Quantifying the effect of leaf area loss on sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) yield caused by hail, pests, and diseases is important in the management of this crop, both from a technical and economic point of view. The effect of defoliation depends, however, on the foliar surface eliminated and on the growth stage at which this takes place. This effect has been quantified in the USA, but these data are lacking for specific conditions of Europe. The aim of this paper was to determine the response of sunflower cultivation to several levels of defoliation that took place at different growth stages under European growth conditions. Four field trials were conducted by applying four defoliation treatments (nondefoliated control, 33, 66, and 100%) at different growth stages ranging from preflowering (R2) to physiological maturity (R9). Crop yield loss increased with increasing level of defoliation. Preflowering stage R3 was the most sensitive. At this stage a 100% defoliation of the leaf surface resulted in 92% yield loss, reducing both the number of seeds per head and 1000‐seed weight. A 100% defoliation at stage R7 (back of head a pale yellow) caused a 50% yield loss, while at stage R9 (physiological maturity) defoliation had no effect on yield. The yield loss caused by defoliation at different plant growth stages under European conditions differed slightly from the one designed for U.S. conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower yield loss increased as defoliation increased.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
Crop yield losse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
increasing level of defoliatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop yield loss increased with increasing level of defoliation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The R3 preflowering stage was most sensitive to defoliation.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
Preflowering stage R3e0
Outcome
most sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preflowering stage R3 was the most sensitive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At R3, complete defoliation caused 92% yield loss.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
this stagee0
Treatment
100% defoliation of the leaf surfacee0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
92%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At this stage a 100% defoliation of the leaf surface resulted in 92% yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At R3, complete defoliation reduced seeds per head and seed weight.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0e1
Treatment
100% defoliation of the leaf surfacee0e1
Outcome
number of seeds per head and 1000‐seed weighte0e1
Direction
reducinge0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing both the number of seeds per head and 1000‐seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“At this stage a 100% defoliation of the leaf surface resulted in 92% yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At R7, complete defoliation caused 50% yield loss.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
stage R7e0
Treatment
100% defoliatione0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 100% defoliation at stage R7 (back of head a pale yellow) caused a 50% yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At R9, defoliation had no effect on yield.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
stage R9e0
Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at stage R9 (physiological maturity) defoliation had no effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss under European conditions differed slightly from the US schedule.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
differed slightlye0
Comparator
the one designed for U.S. conditionse0
Setting
European conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield loss caused by defoliation at different plant growth stages under European conditions differed slightly from the one designed for U.S. conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.