Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of organic, inorganic manure and lime application on soil physiochemical properties and yield of maize in acidic soil of mid hill of Arunachal Pradesh

Jitendra Kumar; H Kalita; Rajesh A Alone

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was aimed to determine the effects of organic and inorganic manures and lime application on growth and yield of maize and their impacts on soil physico-chemical characteristics. Vermicompost, and biofertilizers were applied as organic nutrient source while urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP) and Murate of potash (MOP) were used at different concentrations as inorganic nutrients source viz., T1: Unfertilized control; T2: Vermicompost (7 tha-1) T3 Lime applaction 3 tha-1year-1 T4 50% RDF with lime application T5 50% RDF T6 100% RDF T7 Biofertilizers. Results showed that growth and yield of maize were substantially improved by fertilizer application alongside organic manures whereas soil total organic C and availble N, P, K contents increased when inorganic fertilizers were applied alone or in combined with organic manures. However, soil pH and soil bulk density decreased due to application of vermicompost. The highest plant height, were obtained in application 100% RDF at Vegetative stage while at the time of harvesting highest plant height was obtained in 50% RDF with lime application The highest yield was obtained in 100% RDF followed by the application of 50% RDF with lime application. Conclusively, integration of inorganic fertilizers with organic manures can be used with optimum rates to improve crop productivity on sustainable basis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer alongside organic manure substantially improved maize growth and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
fertilizer application alongside organic manurese0
Outcome
growth and yield of maizee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of maize were substantially improved by fertilizer application alongside organic manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizers alone or with organic manure increased soil organic carbon and available nutrients.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil total organic C and availble N, P, K contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil total organic C and availble N, P, K contents increased when inorganic fertilizers were applied alone or in combined with organic manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost decreased soil pH and bulk density.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
application of vermicomposte0
Outcome
soil pH and soil bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil pH and soil bulk density decreased due to application of vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the vegetative stage, 100% RDF produced the highest plant height.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
Vegetative stagee0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest plant height, were obtained in application 100% RDF at Vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, 50% RDF with lime produced the highest plant height.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
harvestinge0
Treatment
50% RDF with lime applicatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“at the time of harvesting highest plant height was obtained in 50% RDF with lime application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was highest with 100% RDF.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest yield was obtained in 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield under 50% RDF with lime ranked second.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
50% RDF with lime applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
followede0
Comparator
100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest yield was obtained in 100% RDF followed by the application of 50% RDF with lime application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1212 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating inorganic fertilizer with organic manure at optimum rates for sustainable productivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
integration of inorganic fertilizers with organic manurese0
Qualifier
optimum ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“integration of inorganic fertilizers with organic manures can be used with optimum rates to improve crop productivity on sustainable basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1366 · show in text ↑

lime · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

56 papers: 41 positive, 15 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.