Paper · 2020 · Indian Journal of Experimental Biology

Effect of chemicals and biological agents on branch canker disease in tea

14
claims
38
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Branch canker caused by Macrophoma sp. is the most wide spread and serious stem disease of tea plants.In this study, we tried to determine the bioefficacy of different chemical fungicides and indigenous biological strains on branch canker disease in tea plant under glasshouse condition. The infected stem portions were collected and identified through 18S rRNA molecular methods. Bacterial strains were isolated from different tea growing areas and confirmed by16S rRNA technique. Fungal biocontrol strains were obtained from repository Microbial Type Culture Collection and Gene Bank(MTCC), Chandigarh, India.Among the fungicides tested,benomyl (70%) showed better results followed by copper oxychloride (65%). The biocontrol agents Bacillus sp. (50%) and Trichoderma viride (50%) yielded significant results. Pseudomonas sp. showed moderate activity (45%)followed by Trichoderma harzianum (30%). The integrated combination approach,propiconazole/ Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and propiconazole/ B . subtilis recorded effective control against branch canker disease under greenhouse condition followed by hexaconazole/ B . amyloliquefaciens. Combination of fungicides companion (0.70), hexaconazole (0.63) and propiconazole (0.67) were found to be most effective. The organic fungicide tricure gave satisfactory control followed by Gliocladiumvirens against branch canker disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl gave 70% control of tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
benomyle0
Interactor
Macrophoma sp.Macrophomae1pathogen
Outcome
branch cankere1
Direction
bettere0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“benomyl (70%) showed better results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Branch canker caused by Macrophoma sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper oxychloride gave 65% control of tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
copper oxychloridee0
Outcome
branch canker diseasee1
Value
65%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“copper oxychloride (65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“branch canker disease in tea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus sp. gave a significant 50% result against tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
Bacillus sp.e0
Interactor
Bacillus sp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
branch canker diseasee1
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus sp. (50%) and Trichoderma viride (50%) yielded significant results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“branch canker disease in tea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride gave a significant 50% result against tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
branch canker diseasee1
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma viride (50%) yielded significant results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“branch canker disease in tea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas sp. showed moderate activity of 45% against tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
Pseudomonas sp.e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
branch canker diseasee1
Value
45%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas sp. showed moderate activity (45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“branch canker disease in tea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum showed 30% activity against tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
Trichoderma harzianume0
Interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
branch canker diseasee1
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma harzianum (30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“branch canker disease in tea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens effectively controlled tea branch canker in a greenhouse.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
propiconazole/ Bacillus amyloliquefaciense0
Interactor
Bacillus amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
branch canker diseasee0
Direction
effective controle0
Setting
greenhouse conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“propiconazole/ Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and propiconazole/ B . subtilis recorded effective control against branch canker disease under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole with B. subtilis effectively controlled tea branch canker in a greenhouse.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
propiconazole/ B . subtilise0
Interactor
B . subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
branch canker diseasee0
Direction
effective controle0
Setting
greenhouse conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“propiconazole/ B . subtilis recorded effective control against branch canker disease under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexaconazole with B. amyloliquefaciens followed the effective combinations for tea branch canker control.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
hexaconazole/ B . amyloliquefaciense0
Interactor
B . amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
branch canker diseasee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by hexaconazole/ B . amyloliquefaciens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“effective control against branch canker disease under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion had a 0.70 result and was among the most effective fungicides against tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
companione0
Outcome
branch canker diseasee1
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
0.70e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fungicides companion (0.70), hexaconazole (0.63) and propiconazole (0.67) were found to be most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“branch canker disease in tea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexaconazole had a 0.63 result and was among the most effective fungicides against tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
hexaconazolee0
Outcome
branch canker diseasee1
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
0.63e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“hexaconazole (0.63) and propiconazole (0.67) were found to be most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“branch canker disease in tea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole had a 0.67 result and was among the most effective fungicides against tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
propiconazolee0
Outcome
branch canker diseasee1
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
0.67e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“propiconazole (0.67) were found to be most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“branch canker disease in tea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tricure gave satisfactory control of tea branch canker.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
tricuree0
Outcome
branch canker diseasee0
Direction
satisfactory controle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“organic fungicide tricure gave satisfactory control followed by Gliocladiumvirens against branch canker disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliocladiumvirens followed tricure for tea branch canker control.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
Gliocladiumvirense0
Interactor
Gliocladiumvirense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
branch canker diseasee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Gliocladiumvirens against branch canker disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–73 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · disease · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · disease · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

propiconazole · disease · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

hexaconazole · disease · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · disease · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

copper atom · disease · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.