Paper · 2014 · Journal of Applied Entomology

Field evaluation of the efficacy of neem oil (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) and Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. in cotton production

C. E. Togbé; R. Haagsma; E. Zannou; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Neem oil ( Azadirachta indica A. Juss) alone and combined with the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin (isolate Bb11) was applied to control cotton pests. The efficacy of these treatments was compared with that of synthetic insecticides applied either in a calendar‐based application or in the ‘Lutte Etagée Ciblée’ ( LEC ) strategy, consisting of using first calendar‐based (half‐dose) applications followed by threshold‐based treatments. The experiment was carried out in collaborative research with farmers in three cotton agro‐ecological zones differing in rainfall, pest prevalence, and farming practices. The neem oil and neem oil‐Bb11 treatments required 2 to 6 applications, while conventional and LEC received 6 to 8 applications. The percentage of damaged reproductive organs in plots treated with neem oil and neem oil plus Bb11 was higher than that recorded under the conventional and LEC strategy, with exception of the zone with the highest rainfall; this resulted in yields being 25% and 39% lower, respectively. Yields in the biopesticide plots were 26–42% higher and in the conventional and LEC plots 44–59% higher than those in the control plots that received only water. Overall, the LEC regime scored best, both in yield and profitability. The incidence of natural enemies was highest in the control and in the plots treated with biopesticides. Although the use of entomopathogen Bb11 and neem oil avoids many problems associated with the application of synthetic insecticides, their efficacy needs to be enhanced by improved formulation or by combining them with other pesticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil required 2 to 6 applications.

Treatment
neem oile0
Outcome
2 to 6 applicationse0
Value
2 to 6 applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The neem oil and neem oil‐Bb11 treatments required 2 to 6 applications, while conventional and LEC received 6 to 8 applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil plus Bb11 required 2 to 6 applications.

Treatment
neem oil‐Bb11e0
Outcome
2 to 6 applicationse0
Value
2 to 6 applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The neem oil and neem oil‐Bb11 treatments required 2 to 6 applications, while conventional and LEC received 6 to 8 applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional and LEC regimes received 6 to 8 applications.

Outcome
6 to 8 applicationse0
Value
6 to 8 applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional and LEC received 6 to 8 applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil plots had more damaged reproductive organs than conventional and LEC plots except in the wettest zone.

Treatment
neem oile0
Outcome
percentage of damaged reproductive organse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
with exception of the zone with the highest rainfalle0
Comparator
conventional and LEC strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of damaged reproductive organs in plots treated with neem oil and neem oil plus Bb11 was higher than that recorded under the conventional and LEC strategy, with exception of the zone with the highest rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil plus Bb11 plots had more damaged reproductive organs than conventional and LEC plots except in the wettest zone.

Treatment
neem oil plus Bb11e0
Interactor
Bb11e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
percentage of damaged reproductive organse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
with exception of the zone with the highest rainfalle0
Comparator
conventional and LEC strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of damaged reproductive organs in plots treated with neem oil and neem oil plus Bb11 was higher than that recorded under the conventional and LEC strategy, with exception of the zone with the highest rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil yield was 25% lower than synthetic regimes.

Treatment
neem oile0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
conventional and LEC strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of damaged reproductive organs in plots treated with neem oil and neem oil plus Bb11 was higher than that recorded under the conventional and LEC strategy, with exception of the zone with the highest rainfall; this resulted in yields being 25% and 39% lower, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil plus Bb11 yield was 39% lower than synthetic regimes.

Treatment
neem oil plus Bb11e0
Interactor
Bb11e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
39%e0
Comparator
conventional and LEC strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem oil plus Bb11 was higher than that recorded under the conventional and LEC strategy, with exception of the zone with the highest rainfall; this resulted in yields being 25% and 39% lower, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide plots yielded 26–42% more than water control plots.

Treatment
biopesticide plotse0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
26–42%e0
Comparator
control plots that received only watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields in the biopesticide plots were 26–42% higher and in the conventional and LEC plots 44–59% higher than those in the control plots that received only water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional and LEC plots yielded 44–59% more than water control plots.

Treatment
conventional and LEC plotse0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
44–59%e0
Comparator
control plots that received only watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields in the biopesticide plots were 26–42% higher and in the conventional and LEC plots 44–59% higher than those in the control plots that received only water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LEC performed best on yield and profitability.

Treatment
LEC regimee0
Outcome
yield and profitabilitye0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, the LEC regime scored best, both in yield and profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural enemies were most frequent in control and biopesticide plots.

Outcome
incidence of natural enemiese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of natural enemies was highest in the control and in the plots treated with biopesticides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend improving Bb11 and neem oil efficacy through formulation or combinations.

Outcome
improved formulation or by combining them with other pesticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their efficacy needs to be enhanced by improved formulation or by combining them with other pesticides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1637 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

botanical · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.