Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Micronutrients (Zn, B and Mo) Foliar Application at Various Growth Stages of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) on Yield and Yield Components

M. Mekkei

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field trials were conducted during 2015/16 and 2016/17 winter seasons, at Agric. Res. Stat., Fac. Agric., Cairo Univ., Giza, Egypt, to study response yield and its attributes of chickpea to zinc (Zn), Boron (B) and molybdenum (Mo) in four combination at three growth stages; V3: vegetative stage (30 days after planting), R1: start of flowering (45 days after planting) and R6: pod initiation (60 days after planting). The treatments of micronutrients foliar application were T1 (application with tap water), T2 (Zn 0.5 g/l + B 0.5 g/l), T3 (Zn 0.5 g/l + Mo 0.5 g/l), T4 (B 0.5 g/l + Mo 0.5 g/l), T5( Zn 0.5 g/l + B 0.5 g/l + Mo 0.5 g/l). The T5 treatment (Zn + B + Mo) produced significantly the greatest seed yield feddan-1 (702 and 727 kg), stover yield feddan-1 (2275 and 2276 kg), harvest index (23.6 and 24.1%) respectively, in both seasons. The results indicated that the spraying time of microelements did not significantly effect on yield traits in 2015/16 and 2016/17 seasons. The greatest productivity of seed (705 and 732 kg/ fed.) in 2015/16 and 2016/17 seasons, respectively was recorded by combined application of zinc (0.5 g/l) + Boron (0.5 g/l) + molybdenum (0.5 g/l) as foliar spray at start of flowering stage compared with other tested treatments. Combined application of zinc, boron and molybdenum as foliar spray at 45 DAP significantly enhanced the crop yields and protein (%) in seed of chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the greatest seed yield in both seasons.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T5 treatment (Zn + B + Mo)e0
Outcome
seed yield feddan-1e0
Direction
greateste0
Value
702 and 727 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T5 treatment (Zn + B + Mo) produced significantly the greatest seed yield feddan-1 (702 and 727 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the greatest stover yield in both seasons.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T5 treatment (Zn + B + Mo)e0
Outcome
stover yield feddan-1e0
Direction
greateste0
Value
2275 and 2276 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T5 treatment (Zn + B + Mo) produced significantly the greatest seed yield feddan-1 (702 and 727 kg), stover yield feddan-1 (2275 and 2276 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the greatest harvest index in both seasons.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T5 treatment (Zn + B + Mo)e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
23.6 and 24.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T5 treatment (Zn + B + Mo) produced significantly the greatest seed yield feddan-1 (702 and 727 kg), stover yield feddan-1 (2275 and 2276 kg), harvest index (23.6 and 24.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying time did not significantly affect yield traits in either season.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
spraying time of microelementse0
Outcome
yield traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spraying time of microelements did not significantly effect on yield traits in 2015/16 and 2016/17 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar micronutrients at flowering gave greatest seed productivity in 2015/16.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of zinc (0.5 g/l) + Boron (0.5 g/l) + molybdenum (0.5 g/l) as foliar spray at start of flowering stagee0
Outcome
productivity of seede0
Direction
greateste0
Value
705e0
Comparator
other tested treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest productivity of seed (705 and 732 kg/ fed.) in 2015/16 and 2016/17 seasons, respectively was recorded by combined application of zinc (0.5 g/l) + Boron (0.5 g/l) + molybdenum (0.5 g/l) as foliar spray at start of flowering stage compared with other tested treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar micronutrients at flowering gave greatest seed productivity in 2016/17.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of zinc (0.5 g/l) + Boron (0.5 g/l) + molybdenum (0.5 g/l) as foliar spray at start of flowering stagee0
Outcome
productivity of seede0
Direction
greateste0
Value
732 kg/ fed.e0
Comparator
other tested treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest productivity of seed (705 and 732 kg/ fed.) in 2015/16 and 2016/17 seasons, respectively was recorded by combined application of zinc (0.5 g/l) + Boron (0.5 g/l) + molybdenum (0.5 g/l) as foliar spray at start of flowering stage compared with other tested treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc, boron and molybdenum at 45 DAP significantly enhanced crop yields.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Combined application of zinc, boron and molybdenum as foliar spray at 45 DAPe0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of zinc, boron and molybdenum as foliar spray at 45 DAP significantly enhanced the crop yields and protein (%) in seed of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc, boron and molybdenum at 45 DAP significantly enhanced seed protein.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Combined application of zinc, boron and molybdenum as foliar spray at 45 DAPe0
Outcome
protein (%) in seede0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of zinc, boron and molybdenum as foliar spray at 45 DAP significantly enhanced the crop yields and protein (%) in seed of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1423 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

71 papers: 67 positive, 4 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

molybdenum atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

boron atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

boron atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

30 papers: 30 positive, 0 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 42 positive, 5 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.