Paper · 2016 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Molybdenum Stress Modulates Enzymes Responsive to Oxidative Stress and Affects Seeds Viability and Vigor in Chickpea

Rajeev Gopal; Arvind K. Shukla

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The importance of molybdenum (Mo) for plant growth is disproportionate with respect to the absolute amounts required by most plants. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. K-75 plants were raised in refined sand in glasshouse at graded levels from 0.002 to 1 µM for 100 days. Mo deficiency symptoms appeared as interveinal chlorosis of middle and old leaves. Compared with the control (0.2 µM Mo), dry matter, yield and seed protein decreased at low and excess Mo. The concentration of Mo in leaves and seed as well as the activity of nitrate reductase (NR) increased with an increase in Mo supply. The activities of antioxidative enzymes stimulate at both low and excess Mo supply. Low and excess Mo decreased the lipid peroxidation status in chickpea leaves, suggesting its antiperoxidative nature. The values of deficiency, threshold of deficiency and threshold of toxicity of Mo were, respectively, 0.38, 1.2 and 15 µg g−1 in leaves of chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo deficiency produced interveinal chlorosis of middle and old leaves in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
K-75e1
Organ / stage
middle and old leavese2
Treatment
Mo deficiencye2
Outcome
interveinal chlorosis of middle and old leavese2
Setting
glasshousee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. K-75 plants were raised in refined sand in glasshouse at graded levels from 0.002 to 1 µM for 100 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–269 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mo deficiency symptoms appeared as interveinal chlorosis of middle and old leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low and excess Mo supply decreased dry matter, yield and seed protein in chickpea compared with the 0.2 µM Mo control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
K-75e1
Treatment
low and excess Moe3
Outcome
dry matter, yield and seed proteine3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
control (0.2 µM Mo)e3
Setting
glasshousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. K-75 plants were raised in refined sand in glasshouse at graded levels from 0.002 to 1 µM for 100 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–269 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with the control (0.2 µM Mo), dry matter, yield and seed protein decreased at low and excess Mo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–458 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo concentration in leaves and seed and nitrate reductase (NR) activity increased with increasing Mo supply in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
K-75e1
Organ / stage
leaves and seede4
Treatment
an increase in Mo supplye4
Gene
nitrate reductase (NR)e4
Outcome
concentration of Mo in leaves and seed as well as the activity of nitrate reductase (NR)e4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
glasshousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. K-75 plants were raised in refined sand in glasshouse at graded levels from 0.002 to 1 µM for 100 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–269 · show in text ↑
e4

“The concentration of Mo in leaves and seed as well as the activity of nitrate reductase (NR) increased with an increase in Mo supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low and excess Mo supply stimulated antioxidative enzyme activities in chickpea compared with the 0.2 µM Mo control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
K-75e1
Treatment
low and excess Mo supplye5
Outcome
activities of antioxidative enzymese5
Direction
stimulatee5
Comparator
control (0.2 µM Mo)e3
Setting
glasshousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. K-75 plants were raised in refined sand in glasshouse at graded levels from 0.002 to 1 µM for 100 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–269 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with the control (0.2 µM Mo), dry matter, yield and seed protein decreased at low and excess Mo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–458 · show in text ↑
e5

“The activities of antioxidative enzymes stimulate at both low and excess Mo supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low and excess Mo decreased lipid peroxidation status in chickpea leaves compared with the 0.2 µM Mo control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume6
Material
K-75e1
Organ / stage
leavese6
Treatment
Low and excess Moe6
Outcome
lipid peroxidation statuse6
Direction
decreasede6
Qualifier
suggesting its antiperoxidative naturee6
Comparator
control (0.2 µM Mo)e3
Setting
glasshousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. K-75 plants were raised in refined sand in glasshouse at graded levels from 0.002 to 1 µM for 100 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–269 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with the control (0.2 µM Mo), dry matter, yield and seed protein decreased at low and excess Mo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–458 · show in text ↑
e6

“Low and excess Mo decreased the lipid peroxidation status in chickpea leaves, suggesting its antiperoxidative nature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–794 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The value of Mo deficiency in chickpea leaves was 0.38 µg g−1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Material
K-75e1
Organ / stage
leavese7
Outcome
values of deficiencye7
Value
0.38e7
Qualifier
µg g−1 in leavese7
Setting
glasshousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. K-75 plants were raised in refined sand in glasshouse at graded levels from 0.002 to 1 µM for 100 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–269 · show in text ↑
e7

“The values of deficiency, threshold of deficiency and threshold of toxicity of Mo were, respectively, 0.38, 1.2 and 15 µg g−1 in leaves of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–943 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The threshold of Mo deficiency in chickpea leaves was 1.2 µg g−1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Material
K-75e1
Organ / stage
leavese7
Outcome
threshold of deficiencye7
Value
1.2e7
Qualifier
µg g−1 in leavese7
Setting
glasshousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. K-75 plants were raised in refined sand in glasshouse at graded levels from 0.002 to 1 µM for 100 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–269 · show in text ↑
e7

“The values of deficiency, threshold of deficiency and threshold of toxicity of Mo were, respectively, 0.38, 1.2 and 15 µg g−1 in leaves of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–943 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The threshold of Mo toxicity in chickpea leaves was 15 µg g−1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Material
K-75e1
Organ / stage
leavese7
Outcome
threshold of toxicity of Moe7
Value
15 µg g−1e7
Setting
glasshousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. K-75 plants were raised in refined sand in glasshouse at graded levels from 0.002 to 1 µM for 100 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–269 · show in text ↑
e7

“The values of deficiency, threshold of deficiency and threshold of toxicity of Mo were, respectively, 0.38, 1.2 and 15 µg g−1 in leaves of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–943 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.