Paper · 2010 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

THE EFFECTS OF DROUGHT STRESS AT DIFFERENT PHENOLOGICAL STAGES ON GROWTH INDICES OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) IN GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS

S R Amiri Deh Ahmadi; M Parsa; Ahmad Nezami; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effects of drought stress at different phenological stages on growth indices of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar Jam, an experiment was carried out at the Research Greenhouse of Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, using a completely randomized design with four replications. Drought stress was applied by preventing irrigation until the soil moisture reached to 20 percent of field capacity at stages of seedling, rapid growth, flowering, podding and seed filling. In this experiment, traits such as yield (seed yield/plant) and growth indices including plant leaf area (PLA), total dry weight (TDW), relative growth rate (RGR), plant growth rate (PGR), net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf area ratio (LAR) and specific leaf area (SLA) were measured. Results showed that the flowering stage in chickpea plant is more sensitive to drought stress because drought stress in flowering stage decreased yield per plant, TDW, RGR, PGR, NAR, but LAR and SLA increased. Seed filling stage showed less sensitivity to drought stress. Drought stress in seedling and rapid growth stages increased PGR and RGR.Key words: Chickpea, Drought stress, Growth index

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at flowering reduced chickpea seed yield per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
cultivar Jame0
Treatment
drought stress in flowering stagee1
Outcome
yield per plante1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar Jam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress in flowering stage decreased yield per plant, TDW, RGR, PGR, NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at flowering decreased TDW, RGR and PGR.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
drought stress in flowering stagee1
Outcome
TDW, RGR, PGRe1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar Jam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress in flowering stage decreased yield per plant, TDW, RGR, PGR, NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at flowering decreased NAR.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
drought stress in flowering stagee1
Outcome
NARe1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar Jam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress in flowering stage decreased yield per plant, TDW, RGR, PGR, NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at flowering increased LAR and SLA.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
drought stress in flowering stagee2
Outcome
LAR and SLAe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar Jam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“but LAR and SLA increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1008 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress in flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea was less sensitive to drought at seed filling.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
Seed filling stagee1
Outcome
sensitivity to drought stresse1
Direction
lesse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar Jam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed filling stage showed less sensitivity to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at seedling stage increased PGR and RGR.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Drought stress in seedlinge1
Outcome
PGR and RGRe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar Jam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress in seedling and rapid growth stages increased PGR and RGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at rapid growth stage increased PGR and RGR.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
rapid growth stagese1
Treatment
Drought stresse1
Outcome
PGR and RGRe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar Jam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress in seedling and rapid growth stages increased PGR and RGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1144 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 9 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

54 papers: 11 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

stage · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 42 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.