Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Physiological Beneficial Effect of Rhizophagus intraradices Inoculation on Tomato Plant Yield under Water Deficit Conditions

Alessandra Fracasso; Luca Telò; Luisa Lanfranco; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
44
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Increasing drought, under current climate change scenarios, will reduce the sustainability of tomato cultivation in the Mediterranean region. The present study evaluates the effect of Rhizophagus intraradices inoculation on tomato plant physiology and yield in response to progressive water deficit conditions. Two commercial products (Prod1 and Prod2) containing only R. intraradices were tested at two different concentrations (1% and 5% of the substrate volume) using three methods of inoculation: (a) mixed to substrate, (b) dissolved in water, (c) spread on seedlings root blocks before transplant. The highest mycorrhization of root fragments (F%) was found with Prod2 at 1% w/w at 40 days after sowing (DAS); this product was therefore used in a second experiment to inoculate tomato plants and test their physiological response to progressive water deficit induced withholding irrigation. Phenology, plant height, stem diameter, chlorophyll content and fluorescence, whole canopy gas exchange, biomass production and partitioning and phosphorus content were investigated in inoculated and not inoculated tomato plants under well-watered and water stressed conditions. Vegetative period and plant height were shorter in inoculated than in control plants; moreover, inoculation with R. intraradices increased fruit production by enhancing chlorophyll content under water stress condition, PS2 efficiency, ETR, Fv/Fm, net photosynthetic rate and whole canopy WUE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prod2 at 1% w/w gave the highest root mycorrhization at 40 DAS.

Organ / stage
root fragmentse0
Treatment
Prod2 at 1% w/we0
Outcome
mycorrhization of root fragments (F%)e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
40 days after sowing (DAS)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mycorrhization of root fragments (F%) was found with Prod2 at 1% w/w at 40 days after sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tomato plants had a shorter vegetative period than controls.

Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
Vegetative periode0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vegetative period and plant height were shorter in inoculated than in control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tomato plants were shorter than controls.

Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vegetative period and plant height were shorter in inoculated than in control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. intraradices inoculation increased tomato fruit production.

Treatment
inoculation with R. intraradicese0
Interactor
R. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
fruit productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with R. intraradices increased fruit production by enhancing chlorophyll content under water stress condition, PS2 efficiency, ETR, Fv/Fm, net photosynthetic rate and whole canopy WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation enhanced chlorophyll content under water stress.

Treatment
inoculation with R. intraradicese0
Interactor
R. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
enhancinge0
Qualifier
under water stress conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with R. intraradices increased fruit production by enhancing chlorophyll content under water stress condition, PS2 efficiency, ETR, Fv/Fm, net photosynthetic rate and whole canopy WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation enhanced PS2 efficiency, ETR and Fv/Fm.

Treatment
inoculation with R. intraradicese0
Interactor
R. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
PS2 efficiency, ETR, Fv/Fme0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with R. intraradices increased fruit production by enhancing chlorophyll content under water stress condition, PS2 efficiency, ETR, Fv/Fm, net photosynthetic rate and whole canopy WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation enhanced net photosynthetic rate and whole canopy WUE.

Treatment
inoculation with R. intraradicese0
Interactor
R. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate and whole canopy WUEe0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with R. intraradices increased fruit production by enhancing chlorophyll content under water stress condition, PS2 efficiency, ETR, Fv/Fm, net photosynthetic rate and whole canopy WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus intraradices · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 58 positive, 15 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.