Abstract
The present study assessed the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on broomrape ( Orobanche aegyptiaca Pers.) control to determine its effects on tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth indices. This experiment was carried out using a randomized complete block design with four replications. The treatments included three strains of AMF ( Glomus mosseae, Glomus intraradices and Glomuse hoe ) at three levels (100, 200 and 300 kg ha −1 ). The control treatments (without mycorrhiza) were with and without broomrape (weed infest and weed free). The results showed that the use of G. intraradices and G. mosseae decreased broomrape seed germination, the number of nodules and the dry weight of the broomrape and increased root area and dry weight of the tomato plant when compared to G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrape. The tomato yield in G. intraradices 300 kg ha −1 treatment increased by 10 and 205% than weed free and weed infest treatments, respectively. Finally, G. intraradices and G. mosseae at, respectively, 200 and 300 kg ha −1 are recommended for land under tomato cultivation that has been contaminated with broomrape.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
G. intraradices reduced broomrape seed germination relative to G. hoe and controls.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- G. intraradicese0
- Interactor
- broomrapee0weed
- Second interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
- Outcome
- broomrape seed germinatione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrapee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of G. intraradices and G. mosseae decreased broomrape seed germination, the number of nodules and the dry weight of the broomrape and increased root area and dry weight of the tomato plant when compared to G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrape”
t0“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
G. mosseae reduced broomrape seed germination, nodules and dry weight relative to G. hoe and controls.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- G. mosseaee0
- Interactor
- broomrapee0weed
- Second interactor
- G. mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee0symbiont - Outcome
- broomrape seed germination, the number of nodules and the dry weight of the broomrapee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrapee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of G. intraradices and G. mosseae decreased broomrape seed germination, the number of nodules and the dry weight of the broomrape and increased root area and dry weight of the tomato plant when compared to G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrape”
t0“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
G. intraradices reduced broomrape nodule number and dry weight.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- G. intraradicese0
- Interactor
- broomrapee0weed
- Second interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
- Outcome
- the number of nodules and the dry weight of the broomrapee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrapee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of G. intraradices and G. mosseae decreased broomrape seed germination, the number of nodules and the dry weight of the broomrape and increased root area and dry weight of the tomato plant when compared to G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrape”
t0“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
G. intraradices increased tomato root area and dry weight.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. intraradicese0
- Interactor
- broomrapee0weed
- Second interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
- Outcome
- root area and dry weight of the tomato plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrapee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of G. intraradices and G. mosseae decreased broomrape seed germination, the number of nodules and the dry weight of the broomrape and increased root area and dry weight of the tomato plant when compared to G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrape”
Claim · model-written summary
G. mosseae increased tomato root area and dry weight.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. mosseaee0
- Interactor
- broomrapee0weed
- Second interactor
- G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
- Outcome
- root area and dry weight of the tomato plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrapee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of G. intraradices and G. mosseae decreased broomrape seed germination, the number of nodules and the dry weight of the broomrape and increased root area and dry weight of the tomato plant when compared to G. hoe and the control treatments without broomrape”
Claim · model-written summary
G. intraradices at 300 kg ha −1 increased tomato yield by 10% relative to weed free treatment.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. intraradices 300 kg ha −1 treatmente0
- Interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
- Outcome
- tomato yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10e0
- Comparator
- weed freee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tomato yield in G. intraradices 300 kg ha −1 treatment increased by 10 and 205% than weed free and weed infest treatments, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
G. intraradices at 300 kg ha −1 increased tomato yield by 205% relative to weed infested treatment.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. intraradices 300 kg ha −1 treatmente0
- Interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
- Outcome
- tomato yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 205%e0
- Comparator
- weed infeste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tomato yield in G. intraradices 300 kg ha −1 treatment increased by 10 and 205% than weed free and weed infest treatments, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
G. intraradices at 200 kg ha −1 is recommended for broomrape contaminated tomato land.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. intraradicese0
- Interactor
- broomrapee0weed
- Second interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
- Outcome
- recommended for land under tomato cultivatione0
- Qualifier
- 200 and 300 kg ha −1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. intraradices and G. mosseae at, respectively, 200 and 300 kg ha −1 are recommended for land under tomato cultivation that has been contaminated with broomrape”
Claim · model-written summary
G. mosseae at 300 kg ha −1 is recommended for broomrape contaminated tomato land.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. mosseaee0
- Interactor
- broomrapee0weed
- Second interactor
- G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
- Outcome
- recommended for land under tomato cultivatione0
- Qualifier
- 200 and 300 kg ha −1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. intraradices and G. mosseae at, respectively, 200 and 300 kg ha −1 are recommended for land under tomato cultivation that has been contaminated with broomrape”
The same questions in other papers
Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Funneliformis mosseae · symbiosis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Rhizophagus intraradices · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Rhizophagus intraradices · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.