Paper · 2021 · Molecules

Root-Associated Entomopathogenic Fungi Modulate Their Host Plant’s Photosystem II Photochemistry and Response to Herbivorous Insects

Julietta Moustaka; Nicolai Vitt Meyling; Thure Pavlo Hauser

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The escalating food demand and loss to herbivores has led to increasing interest in using resistance-inducing microbes for pest control. Here, we evaluated whether root-inoculation with fungi that are otherwise known as entomopathogens improves tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leaflets’ reaction to herbivory by Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm) larvae using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plants were inoculated with Metarhizium brunneum or Beauveria bassiana, and photosystem II reactions were evaluated before and after larval feeding. Before herbivory, the fraction of absorbed light energy used for photochemistry (ΦPSII) was lower in M. brunneum-inoculated than in control plants, but not in B. bassiana-inoculated plants. After herbivory, however, ΦPSII increased in the fungal-inoculated plants compared with that before herbivory, similar to the reaction of control plants. At the same time, the fraction of energy dissipated as heat (ΦNPQ) decreased in the inoculated plants, resulting in an increased fraction of nonregulated energy loss (ΦNO) in M. brunneum. This indicates an increased singlet oxygen (1O2) formation not detected in B. bassiana-inoculated plants, showing that the two entomopathogenic fungi differentially modulate the leaflets’ response to herbivory. Overall, our results show that M. brunneum inoculation had a negative effect on the photosynthetic efficiency before herbivory, while B. bassiana inoculation had no significant effect. However, S. exigua leaf biting activated the same compensatory PSII response mechanism in tomato plants of both fungal-inoculated treatments as in control plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before herbivory, M. brunneum-inoculated tomato plants had lower ΦPSII than control plants.

Treatment
M. brunneum-inoculatede3
Interactor
M. brunneumMetarhizium brunneume3symbiont
Outcome
ΦPSIIe3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
control plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
e3

“Before herbivory, the fraction of absorbed light energy used for photochemistry (ΦPSII) was lower in M. brunneum-inoculated than in control plants, but not in B. bassiana-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana inoculation had no significant effect on tomato photosynthetic efficiency before herbivory.

Treatment
B. bassiana inoculatione6
Interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae6symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye6
Direction
no significant effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · InteractorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
e6

“M. brunneum inoculation had a negative effect on the photosynthetic efficiency before herbivory, while B. bassiana inoculation had no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After herbivory, ΦPSII of fungal-inoculated tomato plants increased compared with before herbivory, similar to control plants.

Treatment
fungal-inoculatede4
Interactor
Spodoptera exiguaSpodoptera exiguae2herbivore
Outcome
ΦPSIIe4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
control plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera exigua
Spodoptera exigua · InteractorDumi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
e2

“by Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm) larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–350 · show in text ↑
e4

“After herbivory, however, ΦPSII increased in the fungal-inoculated plants compared with that before herbivory, similar to the reaction of control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tomato plants had a decreased fraction of energy dissipated as heat (ΦNPQ).

Treatment
inoculated plantse5
Outcome
ΦNPQe5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
e5

“the fraction of energy dissipated as heat (ΦNPQ) decreased in the inoculated plants, resulting in an increased fraction of nonregulated energy loss (ΦNO) in M. brunneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. brunneum inoculation increased the fraction of nonregulated energy loss (ΦNO) in tomato.

Treatment
M. brunneume5
Interactor
M. brunneumMetarhizium brunneume5symbiont
Outcome
nonregulated energy loss (ΦNO)e5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
e5

“the fraction of energy dissipated as heat (ΦNPQ) decreased in the inoculated plants, resulting in an increased fraction of nonregulated energy loss (ΦNO) in M. brunneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1070 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M. brunneum-associated response indicates an increased singlet oxygen (1O2) formation in tomato that was not detected in B. bassiana-inoculated plants.

Interactor
M. brunneumMetarhizium brunneume5symbiont
Outcome
singlet oxygen (1O2) formatione0
Qualifier
not detected in B. bassiana-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
e5

“the fraction of energy dissipated as heat (ΦNPQ) decreased in the inoculated plants, resulting in an increased fraction of nonregulated energy loss (ΦNO) in M. brunneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1070 · show in text ↑
e0

“This indicates an increased singlet oxygen (1O2) formation not detected in B. bassiana-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spodoptera exigua leaf biting activated the same compensatory PSII response in tomato of both fungal-inoculated treatments as in control plants.

Treatment
fungal-inoculated treatmentse7
Interactor
S. exiguaSpodoptera exiguae7herbivore
Outcome
compensatory PSII response mechanisme7
Direction
activatede7
Comparator
control plantse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera exigua
Spodoptera exigua · InteractorDumi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
e7

“S. exigua leaf biting activated the same compensatory PSII response mechanism in tomato plants of both fungal-inoculated treatments as in control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1629 · show in text ↑

Beauveria bassiana · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.