Paper · 2019 · VEGETABLE CROPS OF RUSSIA

The influence of lighting on the seeds germination of chinese cabbage and broccoli and antioxidant activity of microgreens in the closed system of the synergotron ISR 1.01

V. N. Zelenkov; V. V. Latushkin; M. I. Ivanova; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Relevance. Growing plants in artificial conditions (closed agroecosystems) requires precise regulation of plant growth factors, starting from the first stages of ontogenesis. One of the parameters is the presence or absence of light in the period of seed germination. For most types of cabbage the standard method is germination in the dark, but for freshly harvested seeds (at rest) light exposure is necessary. According to the literature, the mechanisms of the effect of light on seed germination are complex and ambiguous, so the issue needs detailed research. Methods . Therefore, the purpose of this work was to study the germination of seeds of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis), taking into account the light factor and the simultaneous analysis of antioxidant activity as a marker of changes in metabolic processes. Results . The experiment has revealed a significant increase in the antioxidant activity of the microgreens during germination in the dark compared to germination in the light (in broccoli by 5.5 times, in Chinese cabbage by 4.8 times). Later on, after the seedlings are moved to the light, the differences between the light and dark versions practically disappear. After germination in the light, the antioxidant activity of microgreens in comparison with the original (dry seeds) decreased by 3-3.5 times, while in the dark – on the contrary, increased by 1.5-1.6 times. The final results of germination (germination energy and seed germination) practically do not differ in the versions. In the case of dark germination, the height of microgreens is greater (due to etiolation and stretching in the absence of light), however, later on, the differences in the versions are smoothed out. The biomass of microgreens in the version of light germination on the 4th day after sowing seeds in broccoli is by 9.1% higher, in Chinese cabbage – by 10.5%. In case of Chinese cabbage, differences remained until the end of the experiment (on the 18th day from sowing seeds), in case of broccoli they were smoothed out. Comparison of two kinds of cabbage has showen that broccoli in the closed system of the synergotron forms a much higher aboveground biomass than Chinese cabbage (on the 4th day after sowing – by 37%, on the 18th day – by 75.4% in the dark version).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark germination increased antioxidant activity of broccoli microgreens 5.5-fold relative to light germination.

Treatment
germination in the darke0
Outcome
antioxidant activity of the microgreense0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.5 timese1
Comparator
germination in the lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment has revealed a significant increase in the antioxidant activity of the microgreens during germination in the dark compared to germination in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“in broccoli by 5.5 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1092 · show in text ↑
e2

“germination of seeds of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark germination increased antioxidant activity of Chinese cabbage microgreens 4.8-fold relative to light germination.

Treatment
germination in the darke0
Outcome
antioxidant activity of the microgreense0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.8 timese1
Comparator
germination in the lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment has revealed a significant increase in the antioxidant activity of the microgreens during germination in the dark compared to germination in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Chinese cabbage by 4.8 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1125 · show in text ↑
e2

“germination of seeds of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After germination in light, antioxidant activity of microgreens decreased 3-3.5 times compared with dry seeds in both species.

Taxon
broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)Brassica oleracea var. italicaBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise1
Treatment
germination in the lighte0
Outcome
antioxidant activity of microgreense0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3-3.5 timese0
Comparator
original (dry seeds)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After germination in the light, the antioxidant activity of microgreens in comparison with the original (dry seeds) decreased by 3-3.5 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1397 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination of seeds of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After germination in the dark, antioxidant activity of microgreens increased 1.5-1.6 times compared with dry seeds.

Taxon
broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)Brassica oleracea var. italicaBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise2
Treatment
in the darke0
Outcome
antioxidant activity of microgreense1
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.5-1.6 timese0
Comparator
original (dry seeds)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the dark – on the contrary, increased by 1.5-1.6 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1462 · show in text ↑
e1

“After germination in the light, the antioxidant activity of microgreens in comparison with the original (dry seeds) decreased by 3-3.5 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1397 · show in text ↑
e2

“germination of seeds of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final germination energy and seed germination did not differ between light and dark germination.

Taxon
broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)Brassica oleracea var. italicaBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise2
Treatment
germination in the lighte1
Outcome
germination energy and seed germinatione0
Direction
do not differe0
Comparator
germination in the darke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final results of germination (germination energy and seed germination) practically do not differ in the versions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1580 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experiment has revealed a significant increase in the antioxidant activity of the microgreens during germination in the dark compared to germination in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1066 · show in text ↑
e2

“germination of seeds of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark germination made microgreens taller because of etiolation.

Taxon
microgreense0
Treatment
dark germinatione0
Outcome
height of microgreense0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of dark germination, the height of microgreens is greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light germination gave 9.1% higher microgreen biomass in broccoli on day 4 after sowing.

Treatment
light germinatione0
Outcome
biomass of microgreense0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of microgreens in the version of light germination on the 4th day after sowing seeds in broccoli is by 9.1% higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light germination gave 10.5% higher microgreen biomass in Chinese cabbage on day 4 after sowing.

Treatment
light germinatione0
Outcome
biomass of microgreense0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of microgreens in the version of light germination on the 4th day after sowing seeds in broccoli is by 9.1% higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1907 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Chinese cabbage – by 10.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1909–1938 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Chinese cabbage the biomass difference between light and dark versions persisted to the end of the experiment, while in broccoli it disappeared.

Outcome
differences remained until the end of the experimente0
Qualifier
on the 18th day from sowing seedse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of Chinese cabbage, differences remained until the end of the experiment (on the 18th day from sowing seeds), in case of broccoli they were smoothed out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli in the closed system formed 37% higher aboveground biomass than Chinese cabbage on day 4 after sowing.

Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
37%e1
Qualifier
on the 4th day after sowinge1
Comparator
Chinese cabbagee0
Setting
closed system of the synergotrone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli in the closed system of the synergotron forms a much higher aboveground biomass than Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2262 · show in text ↑
e1

“on the 4th day after sowing – by 37%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2264–2300 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli formed 75.4% higher aboveground biomass than Chinese cabbage on day 18 in the dark version.

Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
75.4%e1
Qualifier
in the dark versione1
Comparator
Chinese cabbagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli in the closed system of the synergotron forms a much higher aboveground biomass than Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2262 · show in text ↑
e1

“on the 18th day – by 75.4% in the dark version”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2302–2348 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 12 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

light · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

light · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 40 positive, 14 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.