Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Nitrogen improves the recovery of maize plants under repeated drought stress

Niels Julian Maywald; Andrés Hernández‐Pridybailo; Uwe Ludewig

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Modern high‐yielding crops, such as maize, are characterized by extensive yield stability across various environments and can cope with repetitive periods of moderate water shortage. However, there is conflicting evidence on how the nutritional status of the plants contributes to stress resilience and whether farmers have management options via nitrogen fertilization. Aims We aimed at identifying factors relevant for improved growth recovery of maize after repeated water deficit stress (WDS). Methods A pot experiment with maize and repeated WDS was conducted. Growth and recovery from stress and physiological parameters were measured. Results The growth penalty of juvenile maize plants exposed to a moderate WDS was lost after additional exposure to a 2‐week WDS. Primed plants transiently contained more osmolytes and performed superior in the second recovery phase when nitrogen fertilization was applied directly before the second WDS. Nitrogen fertilization did not affect the osmolyte quantity, and primed plants had transiently higher antioxidant levels, higher reactive oxygen species production and recovered more quickly with N addition. Conclusions Pot experiments suggest that nitrogen fertilization may be an option to improve maize resilience to repeated WDS, a hypothesis that should be tested more rigorously in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth penalty after moderate water deficit disappeared after a further two-week deficit.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
juvenilee0
Treatment
a 2‐week WDSe0
Outcome
growth penaltye0
Direction
was loste0
Comparator
a moderate WDSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth penalty of juvenile maize plants exposed to a moderate WDS was lost after additional exposure to a 2‐week WDS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed plants transiently contained more osmolytes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
Primed plantse0
Outcome
osmolytese0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
transientlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primed plants transiently contained more osmolytes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With nitrogen applied before the second water deficit, primed plants performed better in recovery.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
Primed plantse1
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
second recovery phasee0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“performed superior in the second recovery phase when nitrogen fertilization was applied directly before the second WDS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“Primed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–805 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization did not affect osmolyte quantity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
osmolyte quantitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization did not affect the osmolyte quantity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed plants had transiently higher antioxidant levels.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
primed plantse0
Outcome
antioxidant levelse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
transientlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“primed plants had transiently higher antioxidant levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1087 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed plants had higher reactive oxygen species production.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
primed plantse0
Outcome
reactive oxygen species productione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“primed plants had transiently higher antioxidant levels, higher reactive oxygen species production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With nitrogen addition, primed plants recovered more quickly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
primed plantse1
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
recoverede0
Direction
more quicklye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recovered more quickly with N addition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1174 · show in text ↑
e1

“primed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1045 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–713 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed nitrogen fertilization as a possible option to improve maize resilience to repeated water deficit.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
nitrogen fertilization may be an option to improve maize resilience to repeated WDSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilization may be an option to improve maize resilience to repeated WDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1299 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 23 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 306 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.