Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Integrated Nitrogen Management on Yield and Economics of Foxtail Millet Genotypes

B. Selectstar Marwein; Rajesh Singh; Punnam Chhetri

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season of 2018 on Foxtail millet of varieties SIA 3156 and SIA 326 (PRASAD) at Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj (U.P). the experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with 6 treatments combinations, consisting of two varieties of Foxtail millet (SIA 3156, SIA 326) and nitrogen management viz., Farmer’s practice (NPK= 40:20:0), 100% RDF (NPK= 50:30:20)), 75% RD N + 25% N through PM, 75% RD N + 25% N through PM + Azospirillum SI, 50% RD N + 50% N through PM and 50% RD N + 50% N through PM + Azospirillum SI. The Experiment revealed that in variety SIA 3156, integration of inorganic fertilizer of 75% RD N through Urea + 25% N through PM + Azospirillum Seed Inoculation resulted in maximum grain yield (2.31 t /ha), higher Net return (₹ 32,229.35 /ha) and maximum B:C ratio (2.59). In variety SIA 326, the experiment reveals that 75% RD N through Urea+ 25% N through Poultry Manure found out to be the best treatment which result in highest grain yield (2.31 t /ha), highest Net return (₹ 25,946.09 /ha) and B:C ratio (2.28).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In foxtail millet variety SIA 3156, 75% RD N through urea + 25% N through poultry manure + Azospirillum seed inoculation gave the maximum grain yield, 2.31 t/ha.

Taxon
Foxtail MilletSetaria italicat0
Material
SIA 3156e0
Treatment
75% RD N through Urea + 25% N through PM + Azospirillum Seed Inoculatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
2.31 t /hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety SIA 3156”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“in variety SIA 3156, integration of inorganic fertilizer of 75% RD N through Urea + 25% N through PM + Azospirillum Seed Inoculation resulted in maximum grain yield (2.31 t /ha), higher Net return (₹ 32,229.35 /ha) and maximum B:C ratio (2.59)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foxtail Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In foxtail millet variety SIA 3156, the same integrated treatment gave a higher net return of 32,229.35 rupees/ha.

Taxon
Foxtail MilletSetaria italicat0
Material
SIA 3156e0
Treatment
75% RD N through Urea + 25% N through PM + Azospirillum Seed Inoculatione1
Outcome
Net returne1
Direction
highere1
Value
₹ 32,229.35 /hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety SIA 3156”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“in variety SIA 3156, integration of inorganic fertilizer of 75% RD N through Urea + 25% N through PM + Azospirillum Seed Inoculation resulted in maximum grain yield (2.31 t /ha), higher Net return (₹ 32,229.35 /ha) and maximum B:C ratio (2.59)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foxtail Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In foxtail millet variety SIA 3156, the same integrated treatment gave the maximum B:C ratio of 2.59.

Taxon
Foxtail MilletSetaria italicat0
Material
SIA 3156e0
Treatment
75% RD N through Urea + 25% N through PM + Azospirillum Seed Inoculatione1
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
2.59e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety SIA 3156”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“in variety SIA 3156, integration of inorganic fertilizer of 75% RD N through Urea + 25% N through PM + Azospirillum Seed Inoculation resulted in maximum grain yield (2.31 t /ha), higher Net return (₹ 32,229.35 /ha) and maximum B:C ratio (2.59)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foxtail Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In foxtail millet variety SIA 326, 75% RD N through urea + 25% N through poultry manure was the best treatment with the highest grain yield, 2.31 t/ha.

Taxon
Foxtail MilletSetaria italicat0
Material
SIA 326e0
Treatment
75% RD N through Urea+ 25% N through Poultry Manuree1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.31 t /hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In variety SIA 326”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RD N through Urea+ 25% N through Poultry Manure found out to be the best treatment which result in highest grain yield (2.31 t /ha), highest Net return (₹ 25,946.09 /ha) and B:C ratio (2.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foxtail Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In foxtail millet variety SIA 326, the same treatment gave the highest net return of 25,946.09 rupees/ha.

Taxon
Foxtail MilletSetaria italicat0
Material
SIA 326e0
Treatment
75% RD N through Urea+ 25% N through Poultry Manuree1
Outcome
Net returne1
Direction
higheste1
Value
₹ 25,946.09 /hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In variety SIA 326”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RD N through Urea+ 25% N through Poultry Manure found out to be the best treatment which result in highest grain yield (2.31 t /ha), highest Net return (₹ 25,946.09 /ha) and B:C ratio (2.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foxtail Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In foxtail millet variety SIA 326, the same treatment gave a B:C ratio of 2.28.

Taxon
Foxtail MilletSetaria italicat0
Material
SIA 326e0
Treatment
75% RD N through Urea+ 25% N through Poultry Manuree1
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.28e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In variety SIA 326”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RD N through Urea+ 25% N through Poultry Manure found out to be the best treatment which result in highest grain yield (2.31 t /ha), highest Net return (₹ 25,946.09 /ha) and B:C ratio (2.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foxtail Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 53 positive, 2 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

inoculation · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.