Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of tillage practices, organics and nitrogen levels on growth components, dry matter accumulation and physiological parameters in foxtail millet (Setaria italica)

R. BASAVARAJAPPA; .S. PRABHAKAR; S.I. HALlKATTl

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 1997 98 and 1998 99 at Agricultural Research Station, Hanumanamatti, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, to know the effect of tillage practices, organics and nitrogen levels on growth components, and dry matter accumulation and yield in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) during the rainy season. Among tillage practices, medium tillage and ridging recorded significantly higher height (92.26 cm) at harvest, absolute growth rate (AGR), total dry matter accumulation (8.783 glha) and grain yield (1,307 kglha), followed by medium tillage with flat bed sowing. Among organics, enriched FYM Azospirillum re corded higher plant height (86.35 cm), total dry matter accumulation and grain yield (1,395 kglha). Application of 60 kg Nlha recorded significantly higher plant height (91.36 cm), AGR (0.241 glplantlday), total dry matter produc tion (9.228 glplant ) and grain yield (1,407 kglha), followed by 30 kg Nlha and 0 kg Nlha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium tillage and ridging gave significantly higher plant height at harvest (92.26 cm).

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
medium tillage and ridginge1
Outcome
heighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
92.26 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among tillage practices, medium tillage and ridging recorded significantly higher height (92.26 cm) at harvest, absolute growth rate (AGR), total dry matter accumulation (8.783 glha) and grain yield (1,307 kglha), followed by medium tillage with flat bed sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium tillage and ridging gave significantly higher absolute growth rate.

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
medium tillage and ridginge1
Outcome
absolute growth rate (AGR)e1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among tillage practices, medium tillage and ridging recorded significantly higher height (92.26 cm) at harvest, absolute growth rate (AGR), total dry matter accumulation (8.783 glha) and grain yield (1,307 kglha), followed by medium tillage with flat bed sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium tillage and ridging gave significantly higher total dry matter accumulation (8.783 g/ha).

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
medium tillage and ridginge1
Outcome
total dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
highere1
Value
8.783 glhae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among tillage practices, medium tillage and ridging recorded significantly higher height (92.26 cm) at harvest, absolute growth rate (AGR), total dry matter accumulation (8.783 glha) and grain yield (1,307 kglha), followed by medium tillage with flat bed sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium tillage and ridging gave significantly higher grain yield (1,307 kg/ha).

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
medium tillage and ridginge1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
1,307 kglhae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among tillage practices, medium tillage and ridging recorded significantly higher height (92.26 cm) at harvest, absolute growth rate (AGR), total dry matter accumulation (8.783 glha) and grain yield (1,307 kglha), followed by medium tillage with flat bed sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched FYM with Azospirillum gave higher plant height (86.35 cm).

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
enriched FYM Azospirillume2
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
highere2
Value
86.35 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among organics, enriched FYM Azospirillum re corded higher plant height (86.35 cm), total dry matter accumulation and grain yield (1,395 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched FYM with Azospirillum gave higher grain yield (1,395 kg/ha) and total dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
enriched FYM Azospirillume2
Outcome
total dry matter accumulation and grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
1,395 kglhae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among organics, enriched FYM Azospirillum re corded higher plant height (86.35 cm), total dry matter accumulation and grain yield (1,395 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N/ha gave significantly higher plant height (91.36 cm) than 30 and 0 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
60 kg Nlhae3
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
highere3
Value
91.36 cme3
Comparator
30 kg Nlha and 0 kg Nlhae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 60 kg Nlha recorded significantly higher plant height (91.36 cm), AGR (0.241 glplantlday), total dry matter production (9.228 glplant ) and grain yield (1,407 kglha), followed by 30 kg Nlha and 0 kg Nlha”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 757–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N/ha gave significantly higher absolute growth rate (0.241 g/plant/day).

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
60 kg Nlhae3
Outcome
AGRe3
Direction
highere3
Value
0.241 glplantldaye3
Comparator
30 kg Nlha and 0 kg Nlhae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 60 kg Nlha recorded significantly higher plant height (91.36 cm), AGR (0.241 glplantlday), total dry matter production (9.228 glplant ) and grain yield (1,407 kglha), followed by 30 kg Nlha and 0 kg Nlha”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 757–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N/ha gave significantly higher total dry matter production (9.228 g/plant).

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
60 kg Nlhae3
Outcome
total dry matter productione3
Direction
highere3
Value
9.228 glplante3
Comparator
30 kg Nlha and 0 kg Nlhae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 60 kg Nlha recorded significantly higher plant height (91.36 cm), AGR (0.241 glplantlday), total dry matter production (9.228 glplant ) and grain yield (1,407 kglha), followed by 30 kg Nlha and 0 kg Nlha”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 757–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N/ha gave significantly higher grain yield (1,407 kg/ha).

Taxon
Setaria italicaSetaria italicat0
Treatment
60 kg Nlhae3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
1,407 kglhae3
Comparator
30 kg Nlha and 0 kg Nlhae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Setaria italica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–167 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 60 kg Nlha recorded significantly higher plant height (91.36 cm), AGR (0.241 glplantlday), total dry matter production (9.228 glplant ) and grain yield (1,407 kglha), followed by 30 kg Nlha and 0 kg Nlha”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 757–976 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Azospirillum · growth · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · growth · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 53 positive, 2 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

in vitro · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.