Paper · 2011 · International Journal of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Effect of irrigation with wastewater and foliar fertilizer application on some forage characteristics of foxtail millet ( Setaria italica )

A Ahmadi Aghtape; Ahmad Ghanbari; Alireza Sirousmehr; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to study effects of treated wastewater, with complete fertilizer sprayed on some forage quantitative and qualitative characteristics of foxtail millet (Setaria italica), A split plot experiment based on randomized complete block design (R.C.B design) with three replicates was carried out at the Agriculture Institute of Zabol University in south east Iran during 2009 growing season. Treatments included three levels of irrigation namely, irrigation with tap water at all stages of grows (control), irrigation with wastewater and tap water alternately, irrigation with wastewater for all growing stages, as the main plot and sprayed with three levels of complete fertilizer (NATBA-LIB): non-spraying (control), Sprayed with 600 g of complete fertilizer in each hectare, sprayed with 1200 g of complete fertilizer in each hectare, as were the subplots. According to the results, the irrigation with wastewater and complete fertilizer sprayed had a significant effect on yield and forage quality characteristics. Among the irrigation treatments, irrigation with wastewater for all growing stages cause increase of grain yield and forage quality characteristics such as soluble carbohydrate, crude protein, ash, dry matter digestibility and significant decrease in cell wall, cell wall without hemi cellulose and lignin percentage. Also the highest grain yield and dry matter digestibility were obtained from 1200 g of fertilizer sprayed in comparison with sprayed with 600 g of complete fertilizer and control treatments. Therefore, in order to achieve the desired quantitative and qualitative characteristics of forage millet, using the treated wastewater and complete fertilizer has recommended. Key words: Irrigation, nitrogen, micronutrients, yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wastewater irrigation and fertilizer spraying significantly affected yield and forage quality.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
irrigation with wastewater and complete fertilizer sprayede0
Outcome
yield and forage quality characteristicse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the irrigation with wastewater and complete fertilizer sprayed had a significant effect on yield and forage quality characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wastewater irrigation throughout growth increased grain yield.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
irrigation with wastewater for all growing stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
irrigation with tap water at all stages of grows (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation with wastewater for all growing stages cause increase of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation with tap water at all stages of grows (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wastewater irrigation throughout growth increased soluble carbohydrate, crude protein and ash.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
irrigation with wastewater for all growing stagese0
Outcome
soluble carbohydrate, crude protein, ashe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation with wastewater for all growing stages cause increase of grain yield and forage quality characteristics such as soluble carbohydrate, crude protein, ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wastewater irrigation throughout growth increased dry matter digestibility.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
irrigation with wastewater for all growing stagese1
Outcome
dry matter digestibilitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of grain yield and forage quality characteristics such as soluble carbohydrate, crude protein, ash, dry matter digestibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the irrigation treatments, irrigation with wastewater for all growing stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wastewater irrigation throughout growth decreased cell wall, cell wall without hemi cellulose and lignin percentages.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
irrigation with wastewater for all growing stagese1
Outcome
cell wall, cell wall without hemi cellulose and lignin percentagee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant decrease in cell wall, cell wall without hemi cellulose and lignin percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the irrigation treatments, irrigation with wastewater for all growing stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1200 g fertilizer spray gave the highest grain yield versus 600 g and control.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
1200 g of fertilizer sprayede0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
sprayed with 600 g of complete fertilizer and control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain yield and dry matter digestibility were obtained from 1200 g of fertilizer sprayed in comparison with sprayed with 600 g of complete fertilizer and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1200 g fertilizer spray gave the highest dry matter digestibility versus 600 g and control.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
1200 g of fertilizer sprayede0
Outcome
dry matter digestibilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
sprayed with 600 g of complete fertilizer and control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain yield and dry matter digestibility were obtained from 1200 g of fertilizer sprayed in comparison with sprayed with 600 g of complete fertilizer and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend treated wastewater and complete fertilizer for desired forage millet quantity and quality.

Taxon
forage millete0
Outcome
using the treated wastewater and complete fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“in order to achieve the desired quantitative and qualitative characteristics of forage millet, using the treated wastewater and complete fertilizer has recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1704 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 53 positive, 2 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

application · quality: grain · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.