Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Storage Methods and Fumigation with Phosphine on Storage Efficacy, Germination and Seedlings Parameters of Wheat During Storage Periods

A. Salama; A. El-Kassaby; S. EL-Moursy; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A laboratory experiment was carried out at Seed Technology Research Unit at Mansoura, Dakahlia Governorate, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt, to evaluate the effect of storage methods (normal storage in cotton bags and sealing storage in plastic jars and metal packages) and fumigation with phosphine at 0, 3, 5 and 7 tablets/m3 on storage efficacy, germination and seedlings parameters of wheat during different storage periods (3, 6 and 9 months after harvesting). The most important results can be summarized as follows:- Increasing storage periods of wheat seed from 3 to 6 and 9 months significantly affected storage efficacy characters (insect infestation and weight loss percentages), final germination percentage and seedling parameters (seedling length, root length, shoot length and seedlings fresh and dry weights). - The best results of storage efficacy of wheat recorded when sealed stored in metal packages, followed sealed stored in plastic jars and lastly in cotton bags. Whereas, highest germination and seedling parameters were recorded when sealed stored in metal packages, followed by normal stored in cotton bags and lastly stored in plastic jars. - The lowest percentages of insect infestation and weight loss in wheat seeds were obtained from fumigation with phosphine at the rate of 7 tablets/m3. While, maximum values of germination and seedling parameters were obtained from fumigation with phosphine at the rate of 5 tablets/m3. This study recommended that fumigation wheat seeds before storage in metal packages with phosphine at the rate of 5 tablets/m3 under the environmental conditions of the experiment in Mansoura, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer storage significantly affected insect infestation and weight loss.

Treatment
6 and 9 monthse0
Outcome
insect infestation and weight loss percentagese0
Comparator
3e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing storage periods of wheat seed from 3 to 6 and 9 months significantly affected storage efficacy characters (insect infestation and weight loss percentages)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer storage significantly affected germination and seedling parameters.

Treatment
6 and 9 monthse0
Outcome
final germination percentage and seedling parameterse0
Comparator
3e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing storage periods of wheat seed from 3 to 6 and 9 months significantly affected storage efficacy characters (insect infestation and weight loss percentages), final germination percentage and seedling parameters (seedling length, root length, shoot length and seedlings fresh and dry weights)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metal packages gave the best storage efficacy, followed by plastic jars and cotton bags.

Treatment
sealed stored in metal packagese0
Outcome
storage efficacye0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
plastic jarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“best results of storage efficacy of wheat recorded when sealed stored in metal packages, followed sealed stored in plastic jars and lastly in cotton bags”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metal packages gave the highest germination and seedling parameters, followed by cotton bags and plastic jars.

Treatment
sealed stored in metal packagese0
Outcome
germination and seedling parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
normal stored in cotton bagse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest germination and seedling parameters were recorded when sealed stored in metal packages, followed by normal stored in cotton bags and lastly stored in plastic jars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphine at 7 tablets/m3 gave the lowest infestation and weight loss.

Treatment
fumigation with phosphine at the rate of 7 tablets/m3e0
Outcome
insect infestation and weight losse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“lowest percentages of insect infestation and weight loss in wheat seeds were obtained from fumigation with phosphine at the rate of 7 tablets/m3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphine at 5 tablets/m3 gave maximum germination and seedling parameters.

Treatment
fumigation with phosphine at the rate of 5 tablets/m3e0
Outcome
germination and seedling parameterse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum values of germination and seedling parameters were obtained from fumigation with phosphine at the rate of 5 tablets/m3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1489 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended fumigating wheat seeds at 5 tablets/m3 before storage in metal packages.

Outcome
fumigation wheat seeds before storage in metal packages with phosphine at the rate of 5 tablets/m3e0
Setting
Mansoura, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fumigation wheat seeds before storage in metal packages with phosphine at the rate of 5 tablets/m3 under the environmental conditions of the experiment in Mansoura, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1711 · show in text ↑

phosphine · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphine · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

storage · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

solarization · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

solarization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 26 positive, 22 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.