Paper · 2010 · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)

INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY ON GRAIN MOISTURE, GERMINATION AND VIGOUR OF THREE WHEAT CULTIVARS DURING ONE YEAR STORAGE

Strelec, Ivica; Popović, Ruža; Ivanišić, Ilonka; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Changes in grain moisture, germination and vigour of three wheat cultivars packed in paper bags and stored for one year under four different conditions of environmental temperature and relative humidity (RH) were investigated. During the first ninety days of storage significant reduction in grain moisture content of 4, 2.5 and 0.9 %, respectively, under 40 °C, 25 °C and 4 °C and RH of 45 % occurred. Subsequently grain moisture remained constant until the end of storage. Seeds of examined cultivars lost their germination ability and vigour only under elevated storage temperatures. Germination and vigour loss after one year of storage differed between cultivars being higher for seeds kept under 40°C, RH = 45% (35-85 % and 55-94 %, respectively), than under 25°C, RH = 45 % (10-20 % and 15-22 %, respectively). Obtained data indicate significant influence of storage conditions on moisture content, germination and vigour changes during storage of wheat seeds, as well as varietal dependence of seed viability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40 °C and 45% RH, grain moisture fell 4% during the first ninety days.

Treatment
40 °Ce0
Outcome
grain moisture contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
4e0
Qualifier
RH of 45 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first ninety days of storage significant reduction in grain moisture content of 4, 2.5 and 0.9 %, respectively, under 40 °C, 25 °C and 4 °C and RH of 45 % occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25 °C and 45% RH, grain moisture fell 2.5% during the first ninety days.

Treatment
25 °Ce0
Outcome
grain moisture contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
2.5e0
Qualifier
RH of 45 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first ninety days of storage significant reduction in grain moisture content of 4, 2.5 and 0.9 %, respectively, under 40 °C, 25 °C and 4 °C and RH of 45 % occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 °C and 45% RH, grain moisture fell 0.9% during the first ninety days.

Treatment
4 °Ce0
Outcome
grain moisture contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
0.9 %e0
Qualifier
RH of 45 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first ninety days of storage significant reduction in grain moisture content of 4, 2.5 and 0.9 %, respectively, under 40 °C, 25 °C and 4 °C and RH of 45 % occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain moisture stayed constant after the first ninety days.

Outcome
grain moisturee0
Direction
remained constante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Subsequently grain moisture remained constant until the end of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Examined cultivars lost germination ability and vigour only under elevated storage temperatures.

Treatment
elevated storage temperaturese0
Outcome
germination ability and vigoure0
Direction
loste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds of examined cultivars lost their germination ability and vigour only under elevated storage temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40°C and 45% RH, one-year germination loss was 35-85%.

Treatment
40°C, RH = 45%e0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
35-85 %e0
Comparator
25°C, RH = 45 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination and vigour loss after one year of storage differed between cultivars being higher for seeds kept under 40°C, RH = 45% (35-85 % and 55-94 %, respectively), than under 25°C, RH = 45 % (10-20 % and 15-22 %, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40°C and 45% RH, one-year vigour loss was 55-94%.

Treatment
40°C, RH = 45%e0
Outcome
vigour losse0
Direction
highere0
Value
55-94 %e0
Comparator
25°C, RH = 45 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination and vigour loss after one year of storage differed between cultivars being higher for seeds kept under 40°C, RH = 45% (35-85 % and 55-94 %, respectively), than under 25°C, RH = 45 % (10-20 % and 15-22 %, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25°C and 45% RH, one-year germination loss was 10-20%.

Treatment
25°C, RH = 45 %e0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
10-20 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination and vigour loss after one year of storage differed between cultivars being higher for seeds kept under 40°C, RH = 45% (35-85 % and 55-94 %, respectively), than under 25°C, RH = 45 % (10-20 % and 15-22 %, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25°C and 45% RH, one-year vigour loss was 15-22%.

Treatment
25°C, RH = 45 %e0
Outcome
vigour losse0
Direction
highere0
Value
15-22 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination and vigour loss after one year of storage differed between cultivars being higher for seeds kept under 40°C, RH = 45% (35-85 % and 55-94 %, respectively), than under 25°C, RH = 45 % (10-20 % and 15-22 %, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed viability depended on cultivar.

Outcome
varietal dependence of seed viabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as varietal dependence of seed viability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑

storage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 26 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Wheat seed stored in a refrigerator had the highest germination percentage

    Effect of storage containers and time on seed quality of wheat · 1970 · compared with polyethylene bag, tin container and earthen pitcher

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.