Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of foliar spray of nutrients at different growth stages on pearl millet under Dryland condition

NI Patel; B.S. Patel; C. L. Patel; et al.

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Study to find out the response of pearl millet to foliar spray of nutrients at different growth stages was carried out under dry land condition at All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture centre, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar during kharif 2018-19 on sandy loam soil. The results indicated that application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stages significantly recorded highest plant height (160.3 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.68), length of ear head (25.6 cm), seed yield (1300 kg/ha) and straw yield (2945 kg/ha). Further, foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5% produced higher plant height (163.9 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.57), length of ear head (25.7 cm), grain yield (1383 kg/ha) and straw yield (2998 kg/ha). Further, the higher net return (Rs.23762/ha) with highest B:C ratio (1.92) were observed when foliar spray of nutrients were applied at both the tillering and flowering stages of pearl millet. Significantly higher net return (Rs.25411/ha) and B: C ratio (2.03) were recorded under foliar sprays of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%. Foliar sprays of water soluble complex fertilizer 19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5% at both the tillering and flowering stages of pearl millet improved the growth, yield components and yield. The available nutrients status after harvest of crop did not influenced significantly due to stages for foliar sprays and foliar sprays of nutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering gave the highest plant height (160.3 cm).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stagese0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
160.3 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stages significantly recorded highest plant height (160.3 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.68), length of ear head (25.6 cm), seed yield (1300 kg/ha) and straw yield (2945 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering gave the highest no. of effective tillers (1.68).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stagese0
Outcome
no. of effective tillerse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.68e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stages significantly recorded highest plant height (160.3 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.68), length of ear head (25.6 cm), seed yield (1300 kg/ha) and straw yield (2945 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering gave the highest length of ear head (25.6 cm).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stagese0
Outcome
length of ear heade0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.6 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stages significantly recorded highest plant height (160.3 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.68), length of ear head (25.6 cm), seed yield (1300 kg/ha) and straw yield (2945 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering gave the highest seed yield (1300 kg/ha).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stagese0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1300 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stages significantly recorded highest plant height (160.3 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.68), length of ear head (25.6 cm), seed yield (1300 kg/ha) and straw yield (2945 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering gave the highest straw yield (2945 kg/ha).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stagese0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2945 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of foliar nutrients at tillering and flowering stages significantly recorded highest plant height (160.3 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.68), length of ear head (25.6 cm), seed yield (1300 kg/ha) and straw yield (2945 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar complex fertilizer and ZnSO4 produced higher plant height (163.9 cm).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
163.9 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5% produced higher plant height (163.9 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.57), length of ear head (25.7 cm), grain yield (1383 kg/ha) and straw yield (2998 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar complex fertilizer and ZnSO4 produced higher no. of effective tillers (1.57).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%e0
Outcome
no. of effective tillerse0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.57e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5% produced higher plant height (163.9 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.57), length of ear head (25.7 cm), grain yield (1383 kg/ha) and straw yield (2998 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar complex fertilizer and ZnSO4 produced higher length of ear head (25.7 cm).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%e0
Outcome
length of ear heade0
Direction
highere0
Value
25.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5% produced higher plant height (163.9 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.57), length of ear head (25.7 cm), grain yield (1383 kg/ha) and straw yield (2998 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar complex fertilizer and ZnSO4 produced higher grain yield (1383 kg/ha).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1383 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5% produced higher plant height (163.9 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.57), length of ear head (25.7 cm), grain yield (1383 kg/ha) and straw yield (2998 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar complex fertilizer and ZnSO4 produced higher straw yield (2998 kg/ha).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2998 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5% produced higher plant height (163.9 cm), no. of effective tillers (1.57), length of ear head (25.7 cm), grain yield (1383 kg/ha) and straw yield (2998 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at tillering and flowering gave higher net return (Rs.23762/ha).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
foliar spray of nutrients were applied at both the tillering and flowering stagese0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs.23762/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher net return (Rs.23762/ha) with highest B:C ratio (1.92) were observed when foliar spray of nutrients were applied at both the tillering and flowering stages of pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at tillering and flowering gave higher B:C ratio (1.92).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
foliar spray of nutrients were applied at both the tillering and flowering stagese0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.92e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher net return (Rs.23762/ha) with highest B:C ratio (1.92) were observed when foliar spray of nutrients were applied at both the tillering and flowering stages of pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Complex fertilizer and ZnSO4 spray gave higher net return (Rs.25411/ha).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
foliar sprays of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs.25411/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher net return (Rs.25411/ha) and B: C ratio (2.03) were recorded under foliar sprays of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Complex fertilizer and ZnSO4 spray gave higher B: C ratio (2.03).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
foliar sprays of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%e0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.03e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher net return (Rs.25411/ha) and B: C ratio (2.03) were recorded under foliar sprays of water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) and ZnSO4 @ 0.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest available nutrients were not significantly influenced by spray timing or nutrients.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
stages for foliar sprays and foliar sprays of nutrientse0
Outcome
available nutrients status after harvest of crope0
Direction
did not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The available nutrients status after harvest of crop did not influenced significantly due to stages for foliar sprays and foliar sprays of nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

stage · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

application · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 68 positive, 2 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

255 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.