Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of different level of fertilizers and foliar nutrition on yield attributes and yield of Pearl millet under rainfed condition

Logesh Kumar S; VM Sankaran; M Hemalatha; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was laid out in randomised block design with three replications during rabi season of 2019 at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Killikulam (Tamil Nadu) to study the effect of different level of fertilizers and foliar nutrition on yield attributes and yield of pearl millet under rainfed condition. The investigation was comprised of 13 treatments with different levels and foliar application of fertilizers. The study revealed that yield attributes and yield of pearl millet were significantly differed with treatments imposed. Among the various treatments, application of 125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4 had significantly recorded higher number of productive tillers plant-1 (2.68), earhead length (27.3 cm), earhead girth (8.2 cm), number of grains earhead-1 (2136), test weight (15.46 g), grain yield (2692 kg ha-1) and straw yield (4134 kg ha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The named fertilizer combination produced 2.68 productive tillers per plant.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4e0
Outcome
number of productive tillers plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.68e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4 had significantly recorded higher number of productive tillers plant-1 (2.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The named fertilizer combination produced 27.3 cm earhead length.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4e0
Outcome
earhead lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.3 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4 had significantly recorded higher number of productive tillers plant-1 (2.68), earhead length (27.3 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The named fertilizer combination produced 8.2 cm earhead girth.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4e0
Outcome
earhead girthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.2 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4 had significantly recorded higher number of productive tillers plant-1 (2.68), earhead length (27.3 cm), earhead girth (8.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The named fertilizer combination produced 2136 grains per earhead.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4e1
Outcome
number of grains earhead-1e0
Direction
highere1
Value
2136e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of grains earhead-1 (2136)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4 had significantly recorded higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The named fertilizer combination produced 15.46 g test weight.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4e1
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
highere1
Value
15.46 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“test weight (15.46 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4 had significantly recorded higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The named fertilizer combination produced 2692 kg ha-1 grain yield.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4e1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
2692 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain yield (2692 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4 had significantly recorded higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The named fertilizer combination produced 4134 kg ha-1 straw yield.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4e1
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
4134 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“straw yield (4134 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125% RDF + 1% Urea + 1% KCl + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.5% FeSO4 had significantly recorded higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–690 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium chloride · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.